Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,026

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36

Brazier, John, Roberts, Jennifer, Deverill, Mark·2002·Journal of Health Economics
DOI 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00130-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00130-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Brazier, 1998, Deriving a preference based single index measure from the SF-36, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1115, 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00103-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Brazier, J.E., Deverill, M., Harper, R., Booth, A., 1999a. A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Health Technology and Assessment 3 (9). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Breen, B., 1996. Regression Models: Censored, Sample Selected or Truncated Data. Sage, London. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Brooks, 1996, EuroQol: the current state of play, Health Policy, 37, 53, 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Busschbach, 1999, Estimating parametric relationships between health state description and health valuation with an application to the EuroQol EQ-5D, Journal of Health Economics, 18, 551, 10.1016/S0167-6296(99)00008-9 · DOI
  6. Dolan, 1997, Modelling valuation for Euroqol health states, Medical Care, 35, 351, 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002 · DOI
  7. Garratt, 1993, The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS, British Journal of Medicine, 306, 1440, 10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1440 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Goldstein, 1995. Multilevel Statistical Methods. Halstead Press, New York.
  9. Gravelle, H., 1995. Valuations of Euroqol health states: comments and suggestions. Paper presented at the ESRC/SHHD Workshop on Quality of Life, Edinburgh, unpublished.
  10. Patrick, 1994, Measuring preferences for health states worse than death, Medical Decision Making, 14, 9, 10.1177/0272989X9401400102 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Revicki, 1993, Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life, Quality in Life Research, 2, 477, 10.1007/BF00422222 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Rutten-van Mölken, 1994, Statistical analysis of cost outcomes in a randomized controlled clinical trial, Health Economics, 3, 333, 10.1002/hec.4730030507 · DOI
  13. Torrance, 1982, Applications of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states, Operations Research, 30, 1043, 10.1287/opre.30.6.1043 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Torrance, 1995, Multi-attribute preference functions. Health utilities index, Pharmacological Economics, 7, 503, 10.2165/00019053-199507060-00005 · DOI · Paper page
  15. van Hout, B.A., McDonnell, J., 1992. Estimating a parametric relation between health description and health valuation using Euroqol Instrument. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Euroqol, Vol. 2. IHE Working Paper, Lund, Sweden, 1992.

Cited by

See all 3,026

Metadata

Authors
Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M.
Venue
Journal of Health Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-03
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
271-292
ISSN
0167-6296 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00130-8
OpenAlex
W2092052931
Cited by
3,026
References
3
FWCI
125.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00130-8
The paper
Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00130-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.