Cited by 35E-Government and Public ServicesDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesUsability and User Interface Design

Accessibility and interoperability in e-government systems: outlining an inclusive development process

Bonacin, Rodrigo, Melo, Amanda M., Simoni, Carlos A. C., Baranauskas, M. Cecília C.·2010·Universal Access in the Information Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10209-009-0157-0

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonacin, R., Melo, A. M., Simoni, C. A. C., & Baranauskas, M. C. C.
Affiliations
  • Centro de Tecnologia da Informação Renato Archer (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Corresponding author
  • Bonacin, Rodrigo
  • Melo, Amanda M.
  • Simoni, Carlos A. C.
Venue
Universal Access in the Information Society
Published
2009-07-22
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
17-33
ISSN
  • 1615-5289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-5297
OpenAlex
W2064438611
Cited by
35
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
16.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Universal Access in the Information Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
e-government, accessibility, interoperability, inclusive development, social inclusion, citizen participation, process model, organizational semiotics, participatory design, quality of use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review