Cited by 19Technology Use by Older AdultsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Role of cognitive and functional performance in the interactions between elderly people with cognitive decline and an avatar on TV

Diaz-Orueta, Unai, Etxaniz, Aitziber, Gonzalez, Mari Feli, Buiza, Cristina, Urdaneta, Elena, Yanguas, Javier·2014·Universal Access in the Information Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10209-013-0288-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diaz-Orueta, U., Etxaniz, A., Gonzalez, M. F., Buiza, C., Urdaneta, E., & Yanguas, J.
Venue
Universal Access in the Information Society
Published
2013-01-30
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
89-97
ISSN
  • 1615-5289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-5297
OpenAlex
W2080841894
Cited by
19
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Universal Access in the Information Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
cognitive decline, older adults, digital divide, assistive technology, avatar interaction, television remote control, mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, attention, verbal memory, functional performance, neuropsychological assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review