Cited by 66Social Robot Interaction and HRITechnology Use by Older AdultsVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Elderly Users in Ambient Intelligence: Does an Avatar Improve the Interaction?

Ortiz, Amalia, del Puy Carretero, María, Oyarzun, David, Yanguas, Jose Javier, Buiza, Cristina, Gonzalez, M. Feli, Etxeberria, Igone·2007·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-71025-7_8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ortiz, A., del Puy Carretero, M., Oyarzun, D., Yanguas, J. J., Buiza, C., Gonzalez, M. F., & Etxeberria, I.
Affiliations
  • Vicomtech (ES)
  • Matia Fundazioa (ES)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2007
Pages
99-114
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W1505815090
Cited by
62
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.07
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
ambient intelligence, elderly users, avatars, virtual characters, human-machine interaction, mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, normal aging, emotion recognition, facial expressions, user experience, memory retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review