Cited by 3Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

Motivational persistence and academic procrastination: the moderating role of behavioural deactivation for Romanian female students

Groza, Iustina Alexandra, Ceobanu, Marius Ciprian, Tofan, Cristina Maria·2024·European Journal of Psychology of Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10212-024-00835-4

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Groza, I. A., Ceobanu, M. C., & Tofan, C. M.
Affiliations
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO)
Corresponding author
Groza, Iustina Alexandra
Venue
European Journal of Psychology of Education
Published
2024-04-22
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
3989-4001
ISSN
  • 0256-2928 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-5174
OpenAlex
W4395007938
Cited by
3
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Psychology of Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
academic procrastination, behavioral disengagement, moderating effect, female university students, coping strategies, Romanian students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review