Cited by 100Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesStudent Stress and CopingGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

Understanding procrastination: A case of a study skills course

Open access
Hailikari, T., Katajavuori, N., Asikainen, H.·2021·Social Psychology of Education

Abstract

Abstract Procrastination is consistently viewed as problematic to academic success and students’ general well-being. There are prevailing questions regarding the underlying and maintaining mechanisms of procrastination which are yet to be learnt. The aim of the present study was to combine different ways to explain procrastination and explore how students’ time and effort management skills, psychological flexibility and academic self-efficacy are connected to procrastination as they have been commonly addressed separately in previous studies. The data were collected from 135 students who participated in a voluntary time management and well-being course in autumn 2019. The results showed that students’ ability to organize their time and effort has the strongest association with procrastination out of the variables included in the study. Psychological flexibility also has a strong individual role in explaining procrastination along with time and effort management skills. Surprisingly, academic self-efficacy did not have a direct association with procrastination. Interestingly, our findings further suggest that time and effort management and psychological flexibility are closely related and appear to go hand in hand and, thus, both need to be considered when the aim is to reduce procrastination. The implications of the findings are further discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11218-021-09621-2

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Procrastination undermines students' academic performance, causes stress, and reduces well-being.

    “It has been shown to undermine students’ academic performance, cause stress, and reduce well-being [19].”

    From Academic motivation, procrastination, and adjustment: Exploring their impact on student profiles and academic performance (2025) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction reports that procrastination is associated with lower academic performance, increased stress, and poorer mental health. This supports the three outcomes, but the citing sentence presents them as causal effects, which the passage does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • La procrastinación ha sido considerada usualmente como algo negativo, asociado a problemas de altos niveles de estrés, bajo desempeño académico o una deficiente salud mental.

    “Usualmente se le ha considerado como algo negativo, asociado a problemas de altos niveles de estrés, bajo desempeño académico o una deficiente salud mental(Hailikari et al., 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Ariely, D., & Wertenbroch, K. (2002). Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by pre- commitment. Psychological Science, 13(3), 219-224.
  2. Burka, J. B., & Yuen, L. M. (1982). Mind games procrastinators play. Psychology Today, 16(1), 32-34.
  3. Klein, E. M., Beutel, M. E., Müller, K. W., Wölfling, K., Brähler, E., & Zenger, M. (2019). Assessing pro- crastination. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35, 633-640.
  4. Kurri, E. (2006). Opintojen pitkittymisen dilemma. Tutkimus opintojen sujumattomuustekijöistä yliopistossa ja niihin vaikuttamisen keinoista [The Dilemma of Prolonged Studies. A Research on Reasons behind Prolonged Studies and How to Make a Change]. Otus (Research Foundation of the Finnish Student Unions) 27. Helsinki: University Press.
  5. Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Maher & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 371-402).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hailikari, T., Katajavuori, N., & Asikainen, H.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Hailikari, T.
Venue
Social Psychology of Education
Published
2021-03-22
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
589-606
ISSN
  • 1381-2890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1928
OpenAlex
W3129538864
Cited by
99
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5
FWCI
10.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Psychology of Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Helsinki including Helsinki University Central Hospital
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
procrastination, time management, effort management, psychological flexibility, academic self-efficacy, study skills, student well-being, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review