Cited by 47Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVestibular and auditory disorders

Is there any point to vasovagal syncope?

Open access
van Dijk, J. Gert, Sheldon, Robert·2008·Clinical Autonomic Research

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10286-008-0484-x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VVS is highly probable if syncope is precipitated by pain, fear, or standing, and is associated with typical progressive prodrome (pallor, sweating, and/or nausea).

    “VVS is highly probable if syncope is precipitated by pain, fear, or standing, and is associated with typical progressive prodrome (pallor, sweating, and/or nausea). 8,13-17”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [14]

    The opening section describes vasovagal fainting as syncope induced by slight pain, fear, or standing, supporting the listed triggers. It does not discuss a progressive prodrome of pallor, sweating, or nausea, or state that this combination makes VVS highly probable. The source therefore supports the triggers but not the full diagnostic claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Situational reflex syncope is highly probable if syncope occurs during or immediately after specific triggers, listed in Table 3.

    “Situational reflex syncope is highly probable if syncope occurs during or immediately after specific triggers, listed in Table 3 . 8, 13-17”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [14]

    The opening section describes vasovagal syncope induced by pain, fear, or standing, but it does not address the claimed diagnostic criterion for situational reflex syncope. Searches for situational syncope and syncope during or immediately after specific triggers found no supporting passage in our copy; no page number was provided. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Dijk, J. G., & Sheldon, R.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
Clinical Autonomic Research
Published
2008-08
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
167-9
ISSN
  • 0959-9851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1619-1560
OpenAlex
W1988537888
Cited by
47
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Autonomic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
vasovagal syncope, syncope, autonomic nervous system, vasovagal reflex
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Unconsciousness, Syncope, Vasovagal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review