Cited by 25Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersSleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Sleep disorders in patients with postural tachycardia syndrome

Miglis, Mitchell G., Muppidi, Srikanth, Feakins, Cynthia, Fong, Lori, Prieto, Thomas, Jaradeh, Safwan·2016·Clinical Autonomic Research

Abstract

Objective Patients with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) often describe symptoms of fatigue, sleepiness, and lack of refreshing sleep. We aimed to provide further objective measures of sleep in patients with POTS. Methods POTS patients (n = 18) were selected based on autonomic testing and evaluation at our center. Controls (n = 16) of similar age, gender, and BMI were selected from new patients referred to the Stanford Sleep Disorders Clinic for any sleep-related complaint. All patients underwent polysomnography and completed several sleep questionnaires and a 2-week sleep diary. Results POTS patients and control subjects were of similar age (27 ± 10.2 vs. 29 ± 5.4 years, p = 0.92) and Body Mass Index (21 ± 3.8 vs. 24 ± 4.1, p = 0.14). The majority of subjects in both groups were females (72 % POTS vs. 81 % controls). POTS patients scored higher on subjective fatigue scales but not sleepiness scales. POTS patients scored in the normal range on the BDI and the "evening" category on the MEQ. Their sleep diaries were not different from controls. With the exception of mild OSA, slightly reduced %REM and prolonged REM latency, their PSG data were normal and no different from controls. Conclusions It is unlikely that the sleep-related complaints of POTS patients are the result of a primary sleep disorder unique to POTS. We propose that a combination of factors such as body fatigue, chronic pain, and other somatic symptoms common in POTS patients might be the underlying reason f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10286-015-0331-9

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When asked to quantify and qualify their symptoms, POTS patients score higher on fatigue scales than they do sleepiness scales.

    “When asked to quantify and qualify their symptoms, POTS patients score higher on fatigue scales than they do sleepiness scales,”

    From Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [86]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miglis, M. G., Muppidi, S., Feakins, C., Fong, L., Prieto, T., & Jaradeh, S.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Miglis, Mitchell G.
Venue
Clinical Autonomic Research
Published
2015-12-22
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
67-73
ISSN
  • 0959-9851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1619-1560
OpenAlex
W2207425693
Cited by
25
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Autonomic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, sleep disorders, fatigue, sleepiness, polysomnography, sleep diary, REM sleep, obstructive sleep apnea, autonomic dysfunction, chronic pain, somatic symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Records, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep Wake Disorders, Polysomnography, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review