Cited by 37Global trade and economicsEconomic and Technological InnovationGlobal Trade and Competitiveness

Are all trade agreements equal? The role of distance in shaping the effect of economic integration agreements on trade flows

Freeman, Rebecca, Pienknagura, Samuel·2019·Review of World Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10290-018-0327-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freeman, R., & Pienknagura, S.
Affiliations
  • Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (CH)
  • World Bank (US)
Corresponding author
  • Freeman, Rebecca
  • Pienknagura, Samuel
Venue
Review of World Economics
Published
2018-09-14
Volume
155
Issue
2
Pages
257-285
ISSN
  • 0043-2636 (ISSN-L)
  • 1610-2878
  • 1610-2886
OpenAlex
W2519360082
Cited by
37
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Review of World Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
World Bank Group
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Technological Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global Trade and Competitiveness
Keywords
trade agreements, geographic distance, economic integration, bilateral exports, gravity model, intermediate goods, trade agreement depth, economic similarity, trade flows, international trade

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review