Cited by 1Global trade and economicsWorld Trade Organization LawGlobal Political and Economic Relations

All in favour? Indian business interests and the India-EU FTA

Otteburn, Kari Irwin·2023·Asia Europe Journal

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10308-023-00672-y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Otteburn, K. I.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Otteburn, Kari Irwin
Venue
Asia Europe Journal
Published
2023-06-05
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
311-329
ISSN
  • 1610-2932 (ISSN-L)
  • 1612-1031
OpenAlex
W4379390052
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Asia Europe Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Trade Organization Law
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Political and Economic Relations
Keywords
business interest groups, trade negotiations, policy preferences, chambers of commerce, Global South, economic policy-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review