Cited by 101Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismCognitive Abilities and TestingReading and Literacy Development

The role of the episodic buffer in working memory for language processing

Rudner, Mary, Rönnberg, Jerker·2008·Cognitive Processing

Abstract

A body of work has accumulated to show that the cognitive process of binding information from different mnemonic and sensory sources as well as in different linguistic modalities can be fractionated from general executive functions in working memory both functionally and neurally. This process has been defined in terms of the episodic buffer (Baddeley in Trends Cogn Sci 4(11):417-423, 2000). This paper considers behavioural, neuropsychological and neuroimaging data that elucidate the role of the episodic buffer in language processing. We argue that the episodic buffer seems to be truly multimodal in function and that while formation of unitary multidimensional representations in the episodic buffer seems to engage posterior neural networks, maintenance of such representations is supported by frontal networks. Although, the episodic buffer is not necessarily supported by executive processes and seems to be supported by different neural networks, it may operate in tandem with the central executive during effortful language processing. There is also evidence to suggest engagement of the phonological loop during buffer processing. The hippocampus seems to play a role in formation but not maintenance of representations in the episodic buffer of working memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10339-007-0183-x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rudner, M., & Rönnberg, J.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Rudner, Mary
Venue
Cognitive Processing
Published
2007-10-05
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
19-28
ISSN
  • 1612-4782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1612-4790
OpenAlex
W2043847879
Cited by
100
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
episodic buffer, working memory, language processing, multimodal integration, central executive, phonological loop, hippocampus, frontal network, executive function, multidimensional representation
MeSH terms
Attention, Brain, Dominance, Cerebral, Frontal Lobe, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Short-Term, Nerve Net, Phonetics, Reading, Retention, Psychology, Sign Language, Speech Perception, Multilingualism, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review