Cited by 124Indigenous Studies and EcologyClimate Change Communication and PerceptionClimate Change, Adaptation, Migration

Solastalgia and the Gendered Nature of Climate Change: An Example from Erub Island, Torres Strait

Open access
McNamara, Karen Elizabeth, Westoby, Ross·2011·EcoHealth

Abstract

This communication focuses on respected older womens' ('Aunties') experiences of climate and other environmental change observed on Australia's Erub Island in the Torres Strait. By documenting these experiences, we explore the gendered nature of climate change, and provide new perspectives on how these environmental impacts are experienced, enacted and responded to. The way these adverse changes affect people and places is bound up with numerous constructions of difference, including gender. The responses of the Aunties interviewed to climate change impacts revealed Solastalgia; feelings of sadness, worry, fear and distress, along with a declining sense of self, belonging and familiarity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10393-011-0698-6

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies conducted with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples from Australia highlight the environmental impacts of climate change on emotional wellbeing, including increased community distress from deteriorating the connection to country.

    “Studies conducted with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples from Australia also highlight the environmental impacts of climate change on emotional wellbeing, including increased community distress from deteriorating the connection to country [75,76].”

    From Climate Change and Mental Health: A Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [75]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McNamara, K. E., & Westoby, R.
Affiliations
  • University of the South Pacific (FJ)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
McNamara, Karen Elizabeth
Venue
EcoHealth
Published
2011-06
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
233-236
ISSN
  • 1612-9202 (ISSN-L)
  • 1612-9210
OpenAlex
W2047370571
Cited by
124
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EcoHealth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
Keywords
solastalgia, climate change impacts, older women, Torres Strait, environmental change, sense of belonging
MeSH terms
Aged, Australia, Mental Disorders, Environment, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interviews as Topic, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review