Cited by 58Climate Change and Health ImpactsClimate Change Communication and PerceptionMental Health Treatment and Access

A systematic review of the effects of chronic, slow-onset climate change on mental health

Open access
Burrows, Kate, Denckla, Christy A., Hahn, Jill, Schiff, Jessica E., Okuzono, Sakurako S., Randriamady, Hervet, Mita, Carol, Kubzansky, Laura D. +2 more·2024·Nature Mental Health

Abstract

The mental health effects of weather-related disasters are well characterized, yet less is known about the effect of chronic, slow-onset climate change. We systematically reviewed qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies (57 were included) that investigated the effects of slow-onset climate change on a range of mental health indicators. Droughts, changing temperatures over time and local perceptions of ecosystem changes were the most studied slow-onset conditions. Several quantitative studies noted adverse mental health outcomes associated with these exposures, including depression and anxiety symptoms, suicide and non-specific psychological distress. Qualitative studies further elucidated negative emotions related to chronic climate change, including worry, grief and frustration. However, some studies noted mixed or null findings. Results suggest a need for further research to identify causal pathways and mechanisms through which chronic changes in the climate may affect changes in mental health. Instead of focusing on trauma-based frameworks (as are commonly used in studies of acute disasters), this work should holistically consider individual, community and societal factors that shape the mental health consequences of slow-onset climate change. Burrows, Denckla and colleagues performed a systematic review to evaluate the available evidence linking climate change to mental health outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s44220-023-00170-5

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent systematic and scoping reviews have explored diverse concepts such as climate change perceptions or emotions, reported only on direct impacts, or focused on adolescents.

    “Recent systematic and scoping reviews have explored diverse concepts such as climate change perceptions or emotions [22, 23], reported only on the direct impacts of climate change [24–28], or have focused on adolescents [29].”

    From The relationship between climate change and mental health: a systematic review of the association between eco-anxiety, psychological distress, and symptoms of major affective disorders (2024) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Methods (Inclusion and exclusion criteria; page unavailable) confirm that this systematic review examined mental health in relation to exposure to specific chronic climate hazards. But “only on the direct impacts” is too restrictive: the Discussion (Recommendations for future research; page unavailable) also describes cascading adversity and links between climate change, economic well-being and cultural heritage. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [37]Covidence systematic review software (Veritas Health Innovation, 2020); www.covidence.org.
  2. [47]Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL & Lushene RE Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (self-evaluating questionnaire). (Consulting Psychologists Press, 1970).
  3. [61]Argyle M, Martin M & Crossland J Recent Advances in Social Psychology: An International Perspective (eds Forgas JP & Innes JM) (189– 203) (Elsevier Science Publishers, 1989).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burrows, K., Denckla, C. A., Hahn, J., Schiff, J. E., Okuzono, S. S., Randriamady, H., Mita, C., Kubzansky, L. D., Koenen, K. C., & Lowe, S. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Denckla, Christy A.
Venue
Nature Mental Health
Published
2024-01-15
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
228-243
ISSN
2731-6076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390880568
Cited by
58
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH117278)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
slow-onset climate change, mental health, drought, temperature change, depression, anxiety, suicide, psychological distress, grief, worry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review