The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of size, shape and vessel geometry on nanoparticle distribution
Open accessAbstract
Nanoparticles (NPs) are emerging as promising carrier platforms for targeted drug delivery and imaging probes. To evaluate the delivery efficiency, it is important to predict the distribution of NPs within blood vessels. NP size, shape and vessel geometry are believed to influence its biodistribution in circulation. Whereas, the effect of size on nanoparticle distribution has been extensively studied, little is known about the shape and vessel geometry effect. This paper describes a computational model for NP transport and distribution in a mimetic branched blood vessel using combined NP Brownian dynamics and continuum fluid mechanics approaches. The simulation results indicate that NPs with smaller size and rod shape have higher binding capabilities as a result of smaller drag force and larger contact area. The binding dynamics of rod-shaped NPs is found to be dependent on their initial contact points and orientations to the wall. Higher concentration of NPs is observed in the bifurcation area compared to the straight section of the branched vessel. Moreover, it is found that Péclet number plays an important role in determining the fraction of NPs deposited in the branched region and the straight section. Simulation results also indicate that NP binding decreases with increased shear rate. Dynamic NP re-distribution from low to high shear rates is observed due to the non-uniform shear stress distribution over the branched channel. This study would provide valuable information for NP distribution in a complex vascular network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multifunctional polymeric micelles as cancer-targeted, MRI-ultrasensitive drug delivery systems
Nasongkla, N., Bey, E., Ren, J., Ai, H., Khemtong, C., Guthi, J. S., Chin, S.-F., Sherry, A. D., Boothman, D. A., & Gao, J. (2006) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl061412u · Cited by 1,238
Biologically erodable microspheres as potential oral drug delivery systems
Mathiowitz, E., Jacob, J. S., Jong, Y. S., Carino, G. P., Chickering, D. E., Chaturvedi, P., Santos, C. A., Vijayaraghavan, K., Montgomery, S., Bassett, M., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386410a0 · Cited by 823
Cited by
Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery
Blanco, E., Shen, H., & Ferrari, M. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3330 · Cited by 7,002
Role of nanoparticle size, shape and surface chemistry in oral drug delivery
Banerjee, A., Qi, J., Gogoi, R., Wong, J., & Mitragotri, S. (2016) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.07.051 · Cited by 773
Polymeric nanoparticles: the future of nanomedicine
Banik, B. L., Fattahi, P., & Brown, J. L. (2016) · WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1002/wnan.1364 · Cited by 485
Effect of physicochemical and surface properties on in vivo fate of drug nanocarriers
Zhao, Z., Ukidve, A., Krishnan, V., & Mitragotri, S. (2019) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2019.01.002 · Cited by 444
Organ-on-a-chip platforms for studying drug delivery systems
Bhise, N. S., Ribas, J., Manoharan, V., Zhang, Y. S., Polini, A., Massa, S., Dokmeci, M. R., & Khademhosseini, A. (2014) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.05.004 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, J., Shah, S., Thomas, A., Ou-Yang, H. D., & Liu, Y.
- Venue
- Microfluidics and Nanofluidics
- Published
- 2012-07-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 77-87
- ISSN
- 1613-4982 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-4990
- OpenAlex
- W2031094501
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The influence of size, shape and vessel geometry on nanoparticle distribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10404-012-1024-5
- The paper
- Tan, J., Shah, S., Thomas, A., Ou-Yang, H. D., & Liu, Y. (2013). The influence of size, shape and vessel geometry on nanoparticle distribution. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-012-1024-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.