Cited by 116Cocoa and Sweet Potato AgronomyAfrican Botany and Ecology StudiesAgroforestry and silvopastoral systems

Farmers in Côte d’Ivoire value integrating tree diversity in cocoa for the provision of ecosystem services

Open access
Smith Dumont, E., Gnahoua, G. M., Ohouo, L., Sinclair, F. L., Vaast, P.·2014·Agroforestry Systems

Abstract

Côte d’Ivoire produces 40 % of the world supply of cocoa but much of the plantation area is aging and declining in productivity, while opportunities for land expansion into new forest land are quickly disappearing. Rejuvenation strategies for cocoa presently coalesce either around improved varieties and greater use of agro-chemical inputs in full sun systems or eco-certification that requires trees to be integrated with cocoa. Here, we explore the possibility of uniting these approaches through building on current farmer practice of incorporating trees in their cocoa fields to improve cocoa productivity and diversify their livelihoods. We interviewed 355 farmers about trees integrated in their cocoa fields across four locations in the South-West of Côte d’Ivoire in 2012, stratified by whether or not farmers were eco-certified. Despite the massive deforestation, a rich diversity of trees was found in cocoa fields and an overwhelming majority of farmers (95 %) wanted more trees and/or more tree species, regardless of their certification status or ethnic origin. There was a consensus that most trees were compatible with cocoa, but farmers also traded off negative impacts of some species against their productive contribution to their livelihood. Farmers valued tree diversity on their cocoa plots and provided detailed information on how 32 tree species interacted with cocoa in terms of soil moisture retention, soil fertility improvement and pest and disease interactions but also had key gaps in knowledge about alternative hosts of mirids and mistletoe. The majority of farmers were not aware of the certification requirements for tree species and shade cover but a much higher proportion of certified farmers (76 %) had received information about shade trees than non-certified farmers (15 %), although advice only related to eight tree species. Scope for building on local knowledge and practice to sustainably increase cocoa productivity through promoting tree diversity while enhancing other ecosystem service provision was identified and the next steps required to realize this set out.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10457-014-9679-4

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brou T (2010) Variabilite ´climatique, de ´forestation et dynami- que agrode ´mographique en Co ˆte d'Ivoire. Science et changements plane ´taires Se ´cheresse 21(4):327-329
  2. Oszwald J (2005) Dynamique des formations agroforestie `res en Co ˆte d'Ivoire (depuis les anne ´es 1980 aux anne ´es 2000): suivi par te ´le ´de ´tection et de ´veloppement d'une approche cartographique. 2005. PhD Thesis. Universite de Lille, France
  3. Padi B, Owusu GK (2003) Towards an Integrated Pest Man- agement for Sustainable Cocoa Production in Ghana. Paper from workshop held in Panama, 3/30-4/2, 1998. Smithso- nian institution, Washington D.C. Palla F (2005) Alstonia boonei De Wild. [Internet] Record from PROTA4U. Louppe D, Oteng-Amoako AA, Brink M (eds) PROTA (Plant resources of tropical africa/Ressources ve ´ge ´tales de l'Afrique tropicale), Wageningen, Nether- lands. \http://www.prota4u.org/search.asp[. Accessed 5 July 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith Dumont, E., Gnahoua, G. M., Ohouo, L., Sinclair, F. L., & Vaast, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de Recherche Agronomique (CI)
  • World Agroforestry Centre (KE)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR)
Venue
Agroforestry Systems
Published
2014-03-20
Volume
88
Issue
6
Pages
1047-1066
ISSN
  • 0167-4366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9680
OpenAlex
W2022029016
Cited by
116
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4
FWCI
19.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agroforestry Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Horticulture › Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › African Botany and Ecology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Keywords
Theobroma cacao, tree species diversity, shade trees, ecosystem services, farmer preferences, environmental certification, soil water retention, soil fertility, mistletoe, farmer knowledge, agroforestry, Côte d'Ivoire

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review