Cited by 14Speech and dialogue systemsSocial Robot Interaction and HRILanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Perceptual evaluation of backchannel strategies for artificial listeners

Poppe, Ronald, Truong, Khiet P., Heylen, Dirk·2013·Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10458-013-9219-z

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The production of certain forms of backchannels is likely to sound very 'off' given the preceding context, even if the timing might be appropriate.

    “This is important also for surface-focussed systems, since the production of certain forms of backchannels are likely to sound very 'off, ' given the preceding context, even if the timing might be appropriate (Poppe et al., 2013).”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Poppe et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poppe, R., Truong, K. P., & Heylen, D.
Affiliations
University of Twente (NL)
Corresponding author
Poppe, Ronald
Venue
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Published
2013-01-13
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
235-253
ISSN
  • 1387-2532 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7454
OpenAlex
W1987370716
Cited by
14
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
human-likeness, prosody, gaze features, speech turns, human-agent dialogue

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review