Cited by 162Speech and dialogue systemsSocial Robot Interaction and HRILanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

A probabilistic multimodal approach for predicting listener backchannels

Morency, Louis-Philippe, de Kok, Iwan, Gratch, Jonathan·2010·Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10458-009-9092-y

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Having responses from multiple listeners enables the development of more accurate models for backchannel prediction that continuously emit probabilities resulting in a smooth probability curve.

    “Having responses from multiple listeners enables the development of more accurate models for backchannelprediction (e.g., based on probabilistic sequential models) that do not simply trigger a backchannel based on a rule but continuously emit probabilities resulting in a smooth probability curve that should exhibit regions of high probability during backchannel relevance spaces and can be used for”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Morency et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morency, L.-P., de Kok, I., & Gratch, J.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Morency, Louis-Philippe
Venue
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Published
2009-05-10
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
70-84
ISSN
  • 1387-2532 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7454
OpenAlex
W1991123335
Cited by
162
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
head nodding, virtual humans, multimodal interaction, hidden Markov models, conditional random fields, feature selection, gaze, prosody, human-to-human interaction, chatbots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review