Cited by 38Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMental Health Treatment and AccessPregnancy and Medication Impact

Stigma and attitudes towards antenatal depression and antidepressant use during pregnancy in healthcare students

Gawley, Laura, Einarson, Adrienne, Bowen, Angela·2011·Advances in Health Sciences Education

Abstract

Depression in pregnancy or antenatal depression (AD) occurs in approximately one in five women, with potentially deleterious effects to the mother and fetus. People are encouraged to get treatment for depression; however, pregnant women can experience stigma when they reach out for help with depression. Research indicates that healthcare professionals hold stigma against patients who experience mental health conditions, including depression. The public, as well as healthcare professionals may have negative attitudes towards antidepressant use during pregnancy, despite evidence that many antidepressants are relatively safe for use in pregnancy. The objective of this project was to determine what knowledge and opinions healthcare students may hold towards antenatal depression and its treatment, and whether further knowledge and experience lessened the stigma. Medical, pharmacy, and nursing students (n = 309) were given a scenario regarding a woman with AD based on Corrigan's Attribution Questionnaire and asked seven questions based on the scenario that assessed their level of stigma and questions related to treatment. Each student group demonstrated some stigma towards the woman and all groups lacked knowledge regarding treatment of AD. Overall, the nursing students were the most stigmatizing of the three groups. The study demonstrates that healthcare students hold stigma towards people with mental health problems, including pregnant depressed women. It points to a need to increase education about antenatal depression and its treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10459-011-9289-0

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gawley, L., Einarson, A., & Bowen, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Gawley, Laura
Venue
Advances in Health Sciences Education
Published
2011-03-23
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
669-679
ISSN
  • 1382-4996 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1677
OpenAlex
W2061272855
Cited by
38
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Health Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
antenatal depression, stigma, antidepressant use in pregnancy, health professions students, medical students, pharmacy students, nursing students, mental health attitudes, mental health education, maternal mental health
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Attitude of Health Personnel, Canada, Depression, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Pregnancy, Prejudice, Prenatal Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stereotyping, Students, Health Occupations, Universities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review