Cited by 125Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The need for health AI ethics in medical school education

Katznelson, Gali, Gerke, Sara·2021·Advances in Health Sciences Education

Abstract

Health Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve health care, but at the same time, raises many ethical challenges. Within the field of health AI ethics, the solutions to the questions posed by ethical issues such as informed consent, bias, safety, transparency, patient privacy, and allocation are complex and difficult to navigate. The increasing amount of data, market forces, and changing landscape of health care suggest that medical students may be faced with a workplace in which understanding how to safely and effectively interact with health AIs will be essential. Here we argue that there is a need to teach health AI ethics in medical schools. Real events in health AI already pose ethical challenges to the medical community. We discuss key ethical issues requiring medical school education and suggest that case studies based on recent real-life examples are useful tools to teach the ethical issues raised by health AIs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10459-021-10040-3

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several ethical concerns regarding the use of AI in UGME are described, including algorithmic bias and safeguarding the privacy of students and patients.

    “Several ethical concerns regarding the use of AI in UGME are described [183]. There are concerns related to algorithmic bias [159] and safeguarding the privacy of students and patients [185, 186].”
  • Fifteen publications focused explicitly on ethical considerations concerning the use of AI in medical education.

    “15 publications focused explicitly on this topic [7, 38, 84, 97, 186, 190–199].”
  • Numerous articles (5%) provide guidelines and "tips" on AI in medical education.

    “Numerous articles (5%) provide guidelines and “tips” on AI in medical education [57, 83, 94, 135, 136, 162, 179, 186, 195, 196, 202, 205–210].”
  • Medical chatbots provide diagnostic and treatment recommendations in order to reduce unnecessary doctor visits. However, these medical chatbots may also harm patients if they are not continuously updated, checked, or regulated.

    “medical chatbots provide diagnostic and treatment recommendations in order to reduce unnecessary doctor visits. However, these medical chatbots may also harm patients if they are not continuously updated, checked, or regulated”
  • Recent publications emphasize the importance of teaching AI ethics in medical education.

    “In addition to the technical and legal aspects of the use of AI in medicine, recent publications emphasize the importance of teaching AI ethics in medical education [9-11].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katznelson, G., & Gerke, S.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Gerke, Sara
Venue
Advances in Health Sciences Education
Published
2021-03-03
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
1447-1458
ISSN
  • 1382-4996 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1677
OpenAlex
W3135353559
Cited by
125
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Health Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eYLS (Yale Law School) (submittedVersion)
  • bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF17SA0027784)
  • 2019 Ontario Medical Student Association (OMSA) Medical Student Education Research Grant
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
AI ethics, medical education, medical students, informed consent, algorithmic bias, patient privacy, transparency, safety, resource allocation, case-based teaching
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Delivery of Health Care, Education, Medical, Ethics, Medical, Humans, Schools, Medical, Students, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review