Cited by 507Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence

Open access
Zhang, Jie, Zhang, Zong-ming·2023·BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Abstract

Background: The growing application of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has brought technological breakthroughs to traditional diagnosis and treatment, but it is accompanied by many risks and challenges. These adverse effects are also seen as ethical issues and affect trustworthiness in medical AI and need to be managed through identification, prognosis and monitoring. Methods: We adopted a multidisciplinary approach and summarized five subjects that influence the trustworthiness of medical AI: data quality, algorithmic bias, opacity, safety and security, and responsibility attribution, and discussed these factors from the perspectives of technology, law, and healthcare stakeholders and institutions. The ethical framework of ethical values-ethical principles-ethical norms is used to propose corresponding ethical governance countermeasures for trustworthy medical AI from the ethical, legal, and regulatory aspects. Results: Medical data are primarily unstructured, lacking uniform and standardized annotation, and data quality will directly affect the quality of medical AI algorithm models. Algorithmic bias can affect AI clinical predictions and exacerbate health disparities. The opacity of algorithms affects patients’ and doctors’ trust in medical AI, and algorithmic errors or security vulnerabilities can pose significant risks and harm to patients. The involvement of medical AI in clinical practices may threaten doctors ‘and patients’ autonomy and dignity. When accidents occur with medical AI, the responsibility attribution is not clear. All these factors affect people’s trust in medical AI. Conclusions: In order to make medical AI trustworthy, at the ethical level, the ethical value orientation of promoting human health should first and foremost be considered as the top-level design. At the legal level, current medical AI does not have moral status and humans remain the duty bearers. At the regulatory level, strengthening data quality management, improving algorithm transparency and traceability to reduce algorithm bias, and regulating and reviewing the whole process of the AI industry to control risks are proposed. It is also necessary to encourage multiple parties to discuss and assess AI risks and social impacts, and to strengthen international cooperation and communication.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This paper argues that trustworthy medical AI depends on addressing five ethical/governance factors: data quality, algorithmic bias, opacity, safety and security, and responsibility attribution. It proposes governance through an ethical values–principles–norms framework, with humans remaining the responsible actors and with stronger data management, transparency/traceability, whole-process review, multi-party participation, and international cooperation.

Key findings

  • The paper identifies five factors affecting trustworthiness in medical AI: data quality, algorithmic bias, opacity, safety and security, and responsibility attribution. Poor data quality, including unstructured and inconsistently annotated medical data, directly affects algorithm quality; algorithmic bias can exacerbate health disparities; opacity affects patient and clinician trust; safety/security failures can harm patients; and responsibility attribution remains unclear when accidents occur.
  • It reports illustrative harms and market/regulatory figures: the health AI market was estimated to grow tenfold from 2020 to 2026, reaching $45.2 billion in 2026; U.S. surgical robots were linked to at least 1,391 harm-causing incidents and 144 deaths between 2000 and 2013; 15% of global data breaches came from healthcare in 2017; and as of 2020 the FDA had approved 222 AI medical device products while Europe had approved 240 with European conformity certification.
  • It cites algorithmic bias examples, including an AI for melanoma diagnosis being difficult to apply to darker races because of few medical images of darker races, and a health decision algorithm incorrectly using health care costs rather than disease to represent health need, leading it to conclude Black people were healthier despite being much sicker in the datasets.
  • It argues that current medical AI lacks moral status and should be treated as a tool; humans remain the duty bearers. Governance proposals include strengthening data quality management, promoting data sharing with privacy protections, reducing algorithmic bias, increasing transparency and traceability, regulating and reviewing the whole AI lifecycle, encouraging multi-party risk assessment, and strengthening international cooperation.

Methods

  • The paper uses a multidisciplinary approach and summarizes five subjects influencing trustworthy medical AI: data quality, algorithmic bias, opacity, safety and security, and responsibility attribution.
  • It discusses these factors from technology, law, and healthcare stakeholder/institution perspectives, analyzing both the design level (technical reliability) and application level (human impact).
  • It applies an ethical governance framework of ethical values–ethical principles–ethical norms to propose countermeasures from ethical, legal, and regulatory aspects. No empirical sample, dataset, or statistical analysis is reported.

Limitations

  • The paper does not state limitations in a dedicated limitations section.
  • Evident from the text: it is a conceptual/normative review rather than an empirical study, with no primary data collection, systematic review protocol, or formal evaluation of the proposed governance measures.
  • Evident from the text: many supporting examples are drawn from news reports, regulatory actions, and prior literature rather than from a systematic evidence synthesis, and the governance proposals are not tested for implementation feasibility or effectiveness.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12911-023-02103-9

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 62 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisereasoning

    The quality of data directly determines the quality of medical AI.

    “The quality of data directly determines the quality of medical AI”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning

    All these factors affect people's trust in medical AI.

    “All these factors affect people’s trust in medical AI”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    Algorithms can lead to biased results.

    “However, algorithms can also lead to biased results”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] Sharon T. Self-Tracking for health and the quantified self: re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philos Technol. 2017;30:93–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0215-5. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisereasoning

    The accuracy of the data annotation determines the quality of the dataset.

    “The accuracy of the data annotation determines the quality of the dataset”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    AI systems are only as good as the data provided to them.

    “AI systems are only as good as the data provided to them”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] Johnson SLJ. AI, machine learning, and ethics in health care. J Leg Med. 2020;39:427–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2019.1690604. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 71
  • May combine two claims. 66
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Data-induced bias refers to the bias when the training data is not representative or insufficient that affects the algorithm model.

    “Data-induced bias refers to the bias when the training data is not representative or insufficient that affects the algorithm model”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [27] Mooney SJ, Pejaver V. Big data in public health: terminology, machine learning, and privacy. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39(1):95–112. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014208. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [28] Senders JT, Zaki MM, Karhade AV, et al. An introduction and overview of machine learning in neurosurgical care. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018;160(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3385-8. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Algorithms inherit human biases, and such biases are likely to be reinforced and amplified with the accumulation of data and iterations of algorithms.

    “Not only do algorithms inherit human biases, but such biases are also likely to be reinforced and amplified with the accumulation of data and iterations of algorithms”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Most of the texts in TCM are unstructured data and Chinese medicine has more non-standardized expressions, manual annotation is extremely costly and difficult, which greatly affects data quality.

    “since most of the texts in TCM are unstructured data and Chinese medicine has more non-standardized expressions, manual annotation is extremely costly and difficult, which greatly affects data quality”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These biases may be continuously replicated and amplified in algorithm and lead to biased prediction results, which may cause discriminatory treatment of certain people in medical care and even lead to medical safety accidents.

    “These biases may be continuously replicated and amplified in algorithm and lead to biased prediction results, which may cause discriminatory treatment of certain people in medical care and even lead to medical safety accidents”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The opacity of algorithms affects patients' and doctors' trust in medical AI.

    “The opacity of algorithms affects patients’ and doctors’ trust in medical AI”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In healthcare, biased algorithms may underestimate or overestimate certain patients' risks, and unrepresentative data may consolidate or exacerbate health disparities.

    “In healthcare, biased algorithms may underestimate or overestimate certain patients’ risks, and unrepresentative data may consolidate or exacerbate health disparities”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Data quality directly affects the quality of medical AI algorithm models.

    “data quality will directly affect the quality of medical AI algorithm models”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There are three possible reasons for opacity: algorithms are trade secrets; inability of lay people to understand; complex nature of algorithms.

    “There are three possible reasons for opacity: (1) algorithms are trade secrets that companies intentionally hide; (2) the inability of lay people to understand programming and algorithmic techniques; (3) the complex nature of the algorithms themselves, which are incomprehensible to humans”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32] Burrell J. How the machine “thinks”: understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data Soc. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Five subjects influence the trustworthiness of medical AI: data quality, algorithmic bias, opacity, safety and security, and responsibility attribution.

    “We adopted a multidisciplinary approach and summarized five subjects that influence the trustworthiness of medical AI: data quality, algorithmic bias, opacity, safety and security, and responsibility attribution”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Algorithmic bias includes both human-induced bias and data-induced bias.

    “Algorithmic bias includes both human-induced bias and data-induced bias”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    At present, there are problems in the data of medical AI, such as data errors and omissions, lack of unified metadata standards, difficulties in data fusion, lack of data management, non-standardized strategy for data cleaning, and much medical data is stored in unstructured forms.

    “At present, there are some problems in the data of medical AI, such as data errors and omissions in the original data entry process, lack of unified metadata standards, difficulties in data fusion, lack of data management, non-standardized strategy for data cleaning, and much medical data is stored in unstructured forms such as text and images”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Algorithmic bias can affect AI clinical predictions and exacerbate health disparities.

    “Algorithmic bias can affect AI clinical predictions and exacerbate health disparities”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Algorithmic errors or security vulnerabilities can pose significant risks and harm to patients.

    “algorithmic errors or security vulnerabilities can pose significant risks and harm to patients”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The involvement of medical AI in clinical practices may threaten doctors' and patients' autonomy and dignity.

    “The involvement of medical AI in clinical practices may threaten doctors ‘and patients’ autonomy and dignity”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Deep learning is a typical "black box", it is opaque and uninterpretable, which makes the biases difficult to be detected.

    “deep learning is a typical “black box”, it is opaque and uninterpretable, which makes the biases difficult to be detected”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Medical data are primarily unstructured, lacking uniform and standardized annotation.

    “Medical data are primarily unstructured, lacking uniform and standardized annotation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Watson cannot independently and synthetically evaluate medical problems, nor can it independently conceptualize and search for new relevant information, because it lacks the higher level of cognition required for critical thinking and the diversity of solutions ranked by intrinsic value.

    “Although Watson is good at answering questions, it cannot independently and synthetically evaluate medical problems, nor can it independently conceptualize and search for new relevant information because it lacks the higher level of cognition required for critical thinking and the diversity of solutions ranked by the intrinsic value [67].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [67] Chung J, Zink A. Hey Watson, can i sue you for malpractice? Examining the liability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Asia Pac J Health Law Eth. 2018;11(2):51–80.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Much medical institution data is stored in the cloud or third-party servers, which is more vulnerable to hacking.

    “Much medical institution data is stored in the cloud or third-party servers, which is more vulnerable to hacking”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The hybrid approach combines the top-down and bottom-up approaches and is the current mainstream of AI algorithm design.

    “The hybrid approach combines the first two and is the current mainstream of AI algorithm design.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [77] Wallach W, Allen C, Smit I. Machine morality: bottom-up and top-down approaches for modelling human moral faculties. AI Soc. 2008;22(4):565–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0099-0. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [78] Reddy S, Allan S, Coghlan S, et al. A governance model for the application of AI in health care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019;27(3):491–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz192. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Medical AI replaces certain tasks previously performed by physicians, changing the doctor-patient relationship and posing a dilemma in the division of ethical responsibilities.

    “Medical AI replaces certain tasks previously performed by physicians, which will undoubtedly change the relationship between doctors and patients, and poses a dilemma in the division of ethical responsibilities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Beauchamp and Childress first proposed four major principles of bioethics: respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice.

    “Beauchamp T.L. and Childress J.F. first proposed four major principles of bioethics in their book Principles of Biomedical Ethics: respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice[76]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [76] Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Humans have no consensus on ethical dilemmas like the trolley problem, and it is unlikely to generate an ethical standard that everyone agrees on.

    “In fact, humans have no consensus on ethical dilemmas like the “trolley problem”. It is unlikely to generate an ethical standard that everyone agrees on to deal with the issues, which also poses an ethical challenge for moral algorithms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    AI challenges the perceived authority of clinicians and may influence their independent judgment.

    “In addition, AI challenges the perceived authority of clinicians and may influence their independent judgment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    There is a huge gap between ethical orientation and application.

    “Although people agree with ethical values, there is a huge gap between ethical orientation and application.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    The limited IT power of medical institutions also makes it difficult to ensure data security.

    “The limited IT power of medical institutions also makes it difficult to ensure data security”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisereasoning

    How to find a balance between medical data sharing and patient privacy protection is also an ethical problem faced in medical AI applications.

    “how to find a balance between medical data sharing and patient privacy protection is also an ethical problem faced in medical AI applications”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The value orientation of AI ethics and medical ethics is the same: to promote human health and well-being, and the bottom line is to do no harm to humans.

    “The value orientation of AI ethics and medical ethics is the same, that is, to promote human health and well-being, and the bottom line is to do no harm to humans.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The corresponding legal system has not yet been improved, resulting in the lack of effective regulation and restraint in medical data collection, use and privacy protection.

    “The corresponding legal system has not yet been improved, resulting in the lack of effective regulation and restraint in medical data collection, use and privacy protection”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The third type of opacity is inherent to machine learning and is also known as the algorithmic "black box".

    “The third type of opacity is inherent to machine learning and is also known as the algorithmic “black box””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Due to the many stakeholders, doctors cannot simply be blamed in the application of medical AI; more responsible stakeholders such as developers, algorithm designers, training data providers, and regulators need to be brought in.

    “It can be seen that, due to the many stakeholders, we cannot simply blame the doctors in the application of medical AI, but need to bring in more responsible stakeholders, such as developers of medical AI, designers of algorithms, providers of training data, regulators of AI, etc.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Current medical AI is only an auxiliary tool used by doctors to diagnose and treat diseases, and is not qualified to be a responsible subject.

    “Current medical AI is only an auxiliary tool used by doctors to diagnose and treat diseases, not qualified to be a responsible subject.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Most scholars believe that AI robots at this stage can only belong to the category of tools.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Medical AI, as a technology, contains the values of the developer or designer; therefore, those involved have an ethical responsibility for AI products.

    “Medical AI, as a technology, contains the values of the developer or designer; therefore, those involved have an ethical responsibility for AI products.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The law is a mandatory norm with lagging defects and a long legislative cycle, so it can only be 'hindsight' and cannot provide timely and effective protection measures.

    “The law is a mandatory norm with certain lagging defects, and the legislative process is characterized by a harshness and long cycle, and more often than not, it can only be “hindsight” and cannot provide timely and effective protection measures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Medical AI is still just a machine or program at this stage. It cannot adjust its actions to the actual situation and must rely on doctors to manipulate the machinery or make the final decision.

    “medical AI is still just a machine or program at this stage. It cannot adjust its actions to the actual situation and must rely on doctors to manipulate the machinery or make the final decision”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Healthcare data has high research and business value, but data breach occurs frequently.

    “Healthcare data also has high research and business value, but data breach occurs frequently”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    It is impossible to develop a code that covers all possibilities. Therefore, safety flaws in AI may endanger more patients than the possibility of a single misdiagnosis by a doctor because automated systems will replicate more errors.

    “It is impossible to develop a code that covers all possibilities. Therefore, safety flaws in AI may endanger more patients than the possibility of a single misdiagnosis by a doctor because automated systems will replicate more errors”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] Macnish K. Unblinking eyes: the ethics of automating surveillance. Eth Inf Technol. 2012;14:151–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-012-9291-0. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The opacity of the algorithm creates "ignorance" among human agents and will affect the trust of patients and clinicians in AI tools.

    “The opacity of the algorithm creates “ignorance” among human agents and will affect the trust of patients and clinicians in AI tools”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    This automated setup means that even if the AI gives up control, none of the humans has time to intervene.

    “This automated setup means that even if the AI gives up control, none of the humans has time to intervene, so who is responsible for the accident?”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI neither meets the traditional criteria of free will nor is aware of what it is doing.

    “From Aristotle's “action must originate from the agent, and a person cannot be unaware of what he or she is doing”, AI neither meets the traditional criteria of free will nor is aware of what it is doing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [65] Coeckelbergh M. Artificial intelligence, responsibility attribution, and a relational justification of explainability. Sci Eng Eth. 2020;26(4):2051–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00146-8. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A 2022 NHTSA report showed that in an investigation of 16 Tesla crashes, several showed Autopilot gave back control of the car to the human driver in less than a second on average before the crash, resulting in 15 injuries and one fatality.

    “In 2022, a report by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) showed that in an investigation of 16 Tesla crashes, several showed that Autopilot (Automated Assisted Driving) gave back control of the car to the human driver in “less than a second” on average before the crash and resulted in a total of 15 injuries and one fatality [70].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [70] Gitlin JM. NHTSA data shows Teslas using Autopilot crashed 273 times in less than a year. 2022. https://arstechnica.com/cars/2022/06/teslas-using-autopilot-crashed-273-times-in-less-than-a-year/. Accessed 28 Jul 2022.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Doctors seem to be more repulsed by medical AI than patients. Based on an inherent mindset emphasizing science and logic, doctors are less willing to trust and rely on things they cannot explain.

    “doctors seem to be more repulsed by medical AI than patients. Based on an inherent mindset emphasizing science and logic, doctors are less willing to trust and rely on things they cannot explain”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] Feldman R, Aldana E, Stein K. Artificial intelligence in the health care space: how we can trust what we cannot know. Stanf Law Policy Rev. 2019;30:399–419.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Ethics and morality become an effective complement to the legal system.

    “Therefore, ethics and morality become an effective complement to the legal system, and AI technology innovation must be carried out in accordance with ethical requirements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some scholars argue that although AI may surpass humans in many aspects, AI does not possess free will essentially and does not have moral subjectivity.

    “Some scholars argue that although AI may surpass humans in many aspects, they do not possess free will essentially and does not have moral subjectivity [63, 64].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [63] Gan SP. How can robots have rights. Eth Res. 2017;3:126–30. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9115.2017.03.025. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [64] Sparrow R. Killer robots. J Appl Philos. 2007;24(1):62–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00346.x. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Medical chatbots provide diagnostic and treatment recommendations in order to reduce unnecessary doctor visits. However, these medical chatbots may also harm patients if they are not continuously updated, checked, or regulated.

    “medical chatbots provide diagnostic and treatment recommendations in order to reduce unnecessary doctor visits. However, these medical chatbots may also harm patients if they are not continuously updated, checked, or regulated”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Katznelson G, Gerke S. The need for health AI ethics in medical school education. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2021;26:1447–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10040-3. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The main situations of medical data breaches include cyber attacks such as hacker intrusion and unauthorized access, and even theft or loss of data by insiders in possession of the data.

    “The main situations of medical data breaches include cyber attacks such as hacker intrusion and unauthorized access, and even theft or loss of data by insiders in possession of the data”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    The data breach is also a security concern.

    “The data breach is also a security concern”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most current medical AI algorithms are trained using historical data from retrospective studies. When encountering real-world data that differ from that in the training datasets, the performance of AI may be worse, leading to clinical risks.

    “most current medical AI algorithms are trained using historical data from retrospective studies. When encountering real-world data that differ from that in the training datasets, the performance of AI may be worse, leading to clinical risks”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] Kelly CJ, Karthikesalingam A, Suleyman M, et al. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    It is controversial to grant personality and rights to robots.

    “However, it is controversial to grant personality and rights to robots.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Even if a medical AI could perform computer and mathematical-level explanations, it would be difficult to translate them into meaningful medical explanations. It is because AI is always a statistical correlation analysis rather than a medical causality analysis.

    “even if a medical AI could perform computer and mathematical-level explanations, it would be difficult to translate them into meaningful medical explanations. It is because AI is always a statistical correlation analysis rather than a medical causality analysis”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41] Kamensky S. Artificial intelligence and technology in health care: overview and possible legal implications. DePaul J Health Care Law. 2020;21(3):1–13.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The common value goal in published ethical principles is to put the interests of human beings at the forefront; the development and use of AI must promote the good of mankind.

    “The common value goal mentioned in these ethical principles is to put the interests of human beings at the forefront. That is to say, the development and use of AI must promote the good of mankind.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [71] IEEE. Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems, First Edition. 2016. https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/. Accessed 2 Dec 2022.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [72] Future of life institute. Asilomar AI Principles. 2017. https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/asilomar-ai-principles/. Accessed 2 Dec 2022.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [73] The High-Level Expert Group on AI. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. 2019. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai. Accessed 2 Dec 2022.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    At the beginning of its application, doctors may suffer from machine malfunctions due to inexperience and unskilled operation, some of which can have serious consequences. Patients would not necessarily have suffered this harm if not for the use of medical AI.

    “At the beginning of its application, doctors may suffer from machine malfunctions due to inexperience and unskilled operation, some of which (e.g., operating errors in surgical robots) can have serious consequences. Patients would not necessarily have suffered this harm if not for the use of medical AI”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Turing test suggests that complex AI may have a certain level of consciousness.

    “The Turing test suggests that complex AI may have a certain level of consciousness [61].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [61] Warwick K, Shah H. Passing the turing test does not mean the end of humanity. Cognit Comput. 2016;8(3):409–19. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The medical AI Watson system passed the U.S. physician licensing exam in 2012.

    “The medical AI Watson system passed the U.S. physician licensing exam in 2012 [66].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [66] Jessica SA. From Jeopardy to Jaundice: the medical liability implications of Dr. Watson and other artificial intelligence systems. La Law Rev. 2013;73:1049.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Explaining deep learning-based medical AI is almost impossible, which is related to the connection complexity and mathematical abstraction of deep neural networks. People cannot explain how the machine makes judgments.

    “explaining deep learning-based medical AI is almost impossible, which is related to the connection complexity and mathematical abstraction of deep neural networks. People cannot explain how the machine makes judgments”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Grote T, Berens P. On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare. J Med Eth. 2020;46(3):205–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105586. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Patients are generally repulsed by unexplained AI interventions in diagnostic and treatment sessions. They usually only accept AI to handle administrative matters such as registration, bill payment, and guidance.

    “patients are generally repulsed by unexplained AI interventions in diagnostic and treatment sessions. They usually only accept AI to handle administrative matters such as registration, bill payment, and guidance”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] Liu LL, He YM, Liu XD. A survey on patients perceptions and trust in artificial intelligence healthcare. Chin Med Eth. 2019;32(8):986–90. https://doi.org/10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2019.08.07. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI involvement may diminish the patient's subject position in clinical practices, undermine shared decision-making between doctors and patients, and threaten patient autonomy and dignity.

    “Thus, AI involvement may diminish the patient's subject position in clinical practices, undermine shared decision-making between doctors and patients, and threaten patient’s autonomy and dignity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: What is optimal for one patient in the same clinical situation may not be optimal for other patients.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The safety issues of medical AI are the risks and harms that occur in its practices, such as program errors, being affected by cybersecurity, the need for adequate testing, difficult software certification, etc., covering various legal and ethical issues.

    “The safety issues of medical AI are the risks and harms that occur in its practices, such as program errors, being affected by cybersecurity, the need for adequate testing, difficult software certification, etc., covering various legal and ethical issues”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] O’Sullivan S, Nevejans N, Allen C, et al. Legal, regulatory, and ethical frameworks for develop-ment of standards in artificial intelligence(AI) and autonomous robotic surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2019;15(1):e1968. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1968. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There is a consensus among computer scientists that an inherent tension is between the performance and explainability of machine learning, with the best-performing algorithms being the least transparent and those that provide precise explanatory algorithms often being less accurate.

    “there is a consensus among computer scientists that an inherent tension is between the performance and explainability of machine learning, with the best-performing algorithms being the least transparent and those that provide precise explanatory algorithms often being less accurate”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46] Holzinger A, Biemann C, Pattichis CS. What Do We Need to Build Explainable AI Systems for the Medical Domain?. arXiv, 2017. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.09923 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The algorithmic black box makes models lack explainability and are difficult to proofread. If the algorithm is flawed or incorrect, the output will lead to even greater errors, which will most likely cause diagnostic errors, harm human health, and even deprive human lives.

    “the algorithmic black box makes models lack explainability and are difficult to proofread. If the algorithm is flawed or incorrect, the output will lead to even greater errors, which will most likely cause diagnostic errors, harm human health, and even deprive human lives”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisereasoning

    A gap exists between the machine's rule-based conditions and probabilistic statistics, and the human judgment mechanism, which is based on emotion and epiphanic meditation.

    “A gap still exists between the machine’s rule-based conditions and probabilistic statistics, and the human judgment mechanism, which is based on emotion and epiphanic meditation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The form of the function that relates input data to output is too complex for non-specialists to understand, and even the designer may not be able to understand the logic of the calculation.

    “The form of the function that relates the input data to the output is too complex for non-specialists to understand, and even the designer may not be able to understand the logic of the calculation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Only with the participation of all relevant sectors of society and multiple parties can an ethical and publicly acceptable medical AI be developed.

    “Only with the participation of all relevant sectors of society and multiple parties can an ethical and publicly acceptable medical AI be developed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Trust in AI will improve through a more transparent development process with a better understanding of algorithms and AI functions.

    “Trust in AI will improve through a more transparent development process with a better understanding of algorithms and AI functions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Aspirin was used for about 70 years for its antipyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory clinical effects, but its pharmacological mechanisms were not understood until later.

    “aspirin was used for about 70 years for its antipyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory clinical effects, but its pharmacological mechanisms were not understood until later [93, 94].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [93] London AJ. Artificial intelligence and black-box medical decisions: accuracy versus explainability. Hastings Cent Rep. 2019;49(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.973. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [94] Vane JR, Botting RM. The mechanism of action of aspirin. Thromb Res. 2003;110(5–6):255–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-3848(03)00379-7. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Anonymous data cannot be used to identify a person and is therefore not subject to GDPR rules; if a company collects anonymous data, it does not need to obtain the consent of users.

    “Anonymous data means that it cannot be used to identify a person and is therefore not subject to the GDPR rules, which means that if a company collects anonymous data, it does not need to obtain the consent of the users.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [86] EU: General Data Protection Regulation. 2018. https://gdpr-info.eu. Accessed 28 Jul 2022.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Doctors are not exempt from liability because they are the main actors in diagnosing patients.

    “At the same time, doctors are not exempt from liability because they are the main actors in diagnosing patients.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Algorithm transparency, though not equal to explainability, will form a powerful deterrent and encourage more diverse subjects to participate in supervision, greatly compensating for the lack of supervision of regulatory authorities.

    “Although algorithm transparency is not equal to algorithm explainability, it will form a powerful deterrent and encourage more diverse subjects, such as medical institutions, insurance companies, and social security institutions, to participate in supervision, which will greatly compensate for the lack of supervision of regulatory authorities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    If software development organizations were to require patient consent for each use of aggregated data, it would inevitably increase the cost of data use.

    “In practice, however, if software development organizations were to require patient consent for each use of aggregated data, it would inevitably increase the cost of data use.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Manson and O'Neill argue that more specific consent is not always ethically better and is difficult to achieve in practice; consent requires unique communicative transactions.

    “Manson and O’Neill [87] argue that more specific consent is not always ethically better and is difficult to achieve in practice. Consent requires unique communicative transactions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [87] Manson NC, O’Neill O. Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    From the perspective of human benefits, it is unethical not to use existing clinical data to develop tools to benefit all humanity.

    “From the perspective of human benefits, it is also unethical not to use existing clinical data to develop tools to benefit all humanity [91].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [91] Larson DB, Magnus DC, Lungren MP, et al. Ethics of using and sharing clinical imaging data for artificial Intelligence: a proposed framework. Radiology. 2020;295(3):675–82. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020192536. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In the third scenario, the related people are scrupulous in their duties but still cannot prevent the medical AI from making an incorrect diagnosis that leads to the patients' misfortune; there is no clear evidence of who is responsible, or responsibility cannot be attributed to any individual.

    “In the third scenario, the related people are scrupulous in their duties, but still cannot prevent the medical AI from making an incorrect diagnosis that leads to the patients’ misfortune. There is no clear evidence of who is responsible, or we cannot attribute responsibility to any individual.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Floridi proposed a principle of moral responsibility of faultless responsibility, meaning that no one is at fault but they are still responsible for it.

    “Floridi proposed a principle of moral responsibility of faultless responsibility, which means that no one is at fault, but they are still responsible for it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [79] Floridi L, Peng C. Faultless responsibility: on the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018;374(2083):0112. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3835211. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Existing medical AIs are not moral enablers and do not have the ability to think and make decisions independently and cannot be considered as duty bearers.

    “In the previous section, we have elaborated that existing medical AIs are not moral enablers and do not have the ability to think and make decisions independently and cannot be considered as duty bearers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    In either approach, AI's response to the causality dilemma remains inadequate, and the threat to human moral subjectivity by allowing AI to form universal ethical guidelines spontaneously is even more deadly.

    “However, in either approach, AI’s response to the causality dilemma remains inadequate, and the threat to human moral subjectivity by allowing AI to form universal ethical guidelines spontaneously is even more deadly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is ethical to dispense with re-informed consent for data use under conditions that ensure data security and do not compromise patient privacy, as long as a sound ethical review system is in place.

    “We believe that it is ethical to dispense with re-informed consent for data use under conditions that ensure data security and do not compromise patient privacy, as long as a sound ethical review system is in place.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Medical AI does not have moral status at this stage, and humans remain the responsibility bearers.

    “At the legal level, we clarified that medical AI does not have moral status at this stage, and humans remain the responsibility bearers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Medicine itself is potentially risky and uncertain.

    “Medicine itself is potentially risky and uncertain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    At the current level of medical AI development, doctors are still in the position of supervising and should not let machines make final decisions without their permission.

    “At the current level of medical AI development, doctors are still in the position of supervising and they should not let machines make final decisions without their permission.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    GDPR requires operators to allow users to express a desire for personal data to be 'forgotten', and fines for violating GDPR can be as high as 4% of the global revenue of the fined organization.

    “For example, operators are required to allow users to express a desire for personal data to be “forgotten”, i.e., “I don’t want you to remember my past data and I want you not to use my data for modeling purposes from now on”. At the same time, the consequences of violating GDPR are severe, and fines can be as high as 4% of the global revenue of the fined organization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [86] EU: General Data Protection Regulation. 2018. https://gdpr-info.eu. Accessed 28 Jul 2022.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Patients' clinical data have potential medical value and should be widely shared to promote the health and well-being of all humans.

    “Patients’ clinical data have potential medical value and should be widely shared to promote the health and well-being of all humans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Interpretability is not a necessary or sufficient condition for accountability.

    “Interpretability is not a necessary or sufficient condition for accountability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In 2018, the EU introduced the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the first bill on personal data privacy protection; unlike previous industry regulations, it is a truly enforceable law with specific and strict requirements.

    “In 2018, the EU introduced the first bill on personal data privacy protection-General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) [86]. Unlike previous industry regulations, this is a truly enforceable law with specific and strict requirements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [86] EU: General Data Protection Regulation. 2018. https://gdpr-info.eu. Accessed 28 Jul 2022.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    China's Deep Learning Assisted Decision-Making Medical Device Software Approval Points requires quality control of training data, diversity of data sources, and subdivision of data sets into training, validation, and testing sets with different acquisition requirements.

    “For example, China’s Deep Learning Assisted Decision-Making Medical Device Software Approval Points [81] requires quality control of training data, and should ensure diversity of data sources, with data collected from multiple medical institutions at different geographic and hierarchical levels whenever possible. The Approval points further subdivide the data sets into training sets (for algorithm”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [81] Deep Learning Assisted Decision-Making Medical Device Software Approval Points. China National Medical Products Administration [EB/OL] (2019–7–3). https://www.cmde.org.cn/xwdt/shpgzgg/gztg/20190703141714991.html

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Macnish and Gauttier argue that it is not appropriate to talk about our relationship with data in terms of ownership; there are only weak philosophical grounds for giving citizens control of 'their' data; control should be based around custody of data and the potential for harm.

    “Macnish and Gauttier [82] argue that it's not appropriate to talk about our relationship with data in terms of ownership. There are only weak philosophical grounds on giving citizens control of ‘their’ data. Control should be based around custody of data and the potential for harm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [82] Macnish K, Gauttier S. A pre-occupation with possession: the (non-) ownership of personal data. Big data and democracy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2020. p. 42–56.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Respect for personal privacy is a crucial ethical principle in health care because privacy is linked to personal identity and autonomy.

    “Respect for personal privacy is a crucial ethical principle in health care because privacy is linked to personal identity and autonomy [84].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [84] Cath C. Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018;376(2133):20180080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0080. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Current AI technology essentially obtains data by measuring the real world, extracts algorithmic models from the data, and uses the models to make relevant predictions.

    “Current AI technology essentially obtains data by measuring the real world, extracts algorithmic models from the data, and uses the models to make relevant predictions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    A few companies are keen to propose ethical standards rather than binding rules because there is no substantial penalty if they change or disregard ethical standards.

    “A few companies are keen to propose ethical standards rather than binding rules. The reasons for this are apparent because there is no substantial penalty if they change or disregard ethical standards under this circumstance [80].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80] Calo R. Artificial intelligence policy: a primer and roadmap. UC Davis Law Rev. 2017;2:399–436. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3015350. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    As of 2020, the FDA has approved 222 AI medical device products, and Europe has approved 240 AI medical device products with European conformity certification.

    “As of 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a total of 222 AI medical device products, and Europe has approved a total of 240 AI medical device products with European conformity certification [97].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [97] Ujm A, Pd B, Pknv B. Approval of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based medical devices in the USA and Europe (2015–20): a comparative analysis. Lancet Digits Health. 2021;3:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30292-2. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The main obstacle to data sharing is the ownership of data.

    “The main obstacle to data sharing is the ownership of data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some scholars proposed more lenient forms of informed consent, such as broad consent and blanket consent, to facilitate practical implementation; however, the moral rationality for these informed consents remains controversial.

    “Some scholars proposed more lenient forms of informed consent, such as broad consent and blanket consent, to facilitate practical implementation [88, 89]. However, the moral rationality for these informed consents remains controversial.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [88] Virani AH, Longstaff H. Ethical considerations in biobanks: how a public health ethics perspective sheds new light on old controversies. J Genet Couns. 2015;24(3):428–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9781-9. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [89] Kaufman D, Bollinger J, Dvoskin R, et al. Preferences for opt-in and opt-out enrollment and consent models in biobank research: a national survey of Veterans Administration patients. Genet Med. 2012;14(9):787–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2012.45. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The algorithms of medical AI are based on pre-existing human experience.

    “In addition, the algorithms of medical AI are based on the pre-existing human experience.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Healthcare data are sensitive information about a person and are related to personal privacy.

    “Healthcare data are sensitive information about a person [23, 83] which is also related to personal privacy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [23] Char DS, Shah NH, Magnus D. Implementing machine learning in health care-addressing ethical challenges. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(11):981–3. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1714229. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [83] Vayena E, Blasimme A, Cohen IG. Machine learning in medicine: addressing ethical challenges. PLoS Med. 2018;15(11):e1002689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002689. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Distributed responsibility may result in a lack of individual responsibility, leading to a tendency for everyone to be conservative and making the application and innovation of new technologies impossible.

    “However, this distributed responsibility may result in a lack of individual responsibility, leading to a tendency for everyone to be conservative and making the application and innovation of new technologies impossible.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Algorithms may be continually updated beyond their initially approved clinical function, which may require particular policies and supervision.

    “algorithms may be continually updated beyond their initially approved clinical function, which may require particular policies and supervision.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some believe that patients have an obligation to contribute to improving the quality of the health care system.

    “Regarding the sharing of health care data, some believe that patients have an obligation to contribute to improving the quality of the health care system [90].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [90] Faden RR, Kass NE, Goodman SN, et al. An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. Hastings Cent Rep. 2013;43:16–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.134. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If the doctor has errors in operation, the doctor and the medical institution are responsible.

    “If the doctor has errors in operation, the doctor and the medical institution are responsible.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Educating users and patients about medical AI is a way to ensure that they understand the benefits, risks, and limitations of medical AI devices and increase product transparency and user trust.

    “Educating users and patients about medical AI is also a way to ensure that they understand the benefits, risks, and limitations of medical AI devices and increase product transparency and user trust [98].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [98] FDA. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Software as a Medical Device. 2021. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-software-medical-device. Accessed 29 Jul 2022.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Current medical AI falls under the category of medical devices.

    “Besides, current medical AI falls under the category of medical devices”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    GDPR requires algorithms to have interpretability, and data subjects can take intervention and require interpretation of the relevant data when they are not satisfied with automated decisions.

    “GDPR requires algorithms to have interpretability, and data subjects can take intervention and require interpretation of the relevant data when they are not satisfied with automated decisions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites GDPR

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If a doctor causes damage, the medical institution can recover compensation from the doctor after taking responsibility.

    “If a doctor causes damage, the medical institution can recover compensation from the doctor after taking responsibility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Algorithmic transparency and traceability do not require algorithms to be explainable, but they provide the possibility of algorithmic explanation and form effective supervision.

    “algorithmic transparency and traceability do not require algorithms to be explainable, but they provide the possibility of algorithmic explanation and form effective supervision.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    AI robot participation in diagnosis and treatment is predicated on the approval of the medical institution where it is located.

    “AI robot’s participation in diagnosis and treatment is predicated on the approval of the medical institution where it is located.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Legal experts concerned with AI governance criticize ethical principles as flawed and inadequate in addressing AI's ethical and social issues.

    “Legal experts concerned with AI governance issues criticize ethical principles as flawed and inadequate in addressing AI’s ethical and social issues.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80] Calo R. Artificial intelligence policy: a primer and roadmap. UC Davis Law Rev. 2017;2:399–436. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3015350. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Data and algorithms are the basis of AI computing and decision-making.

    “Therefore, data and algorithms are the basis of AI computing and decision-making.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
104 of 104
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    When accidents occur with medical AI, the responsibility attribution is not clear.

    “When accidents occur with medical AI, the responsibility attribution is not clear”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    What is optimal for one patient in the same clinical situation may not be optimal for other patients.

    “What is optimal for one patient in the same clinical situation may not be so for other patients.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The purpose of AI development is to serve humans better, not to subject humans to AI.

    “We believe that the purpose of AI development is to serve humans better, not to subject humans to AI.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Technology should serve humans, not replace human talent and creativity.

    “Technology should serve humans, not replace human talent and creativity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    At present, there is no unified standardized quality standard, access system, evaluation system and guarantee system for the application of AI in the medical field, and the related policy and regulation system has not been completely established.

    “At present, there is no unified standardized quality standard, access system, evaluation system and guarantee system for the application of AI in the medical field, and the related policy and regulation system has not been completely established yet.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The utilization rate of big data in healthcare is low.

    “The utilization rate of big data in healthcare is low.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most hospital data are unstructured and cannot bring out the value of 'big data'.

    “Although the data in hospitals are enormous, most of them are unstructured data, which cannot bring out the value of “big data”.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many hospitals have not yet established a unified data management system, which is not conducive to unified analysis of data and impacts the application of AI technology in the medical field.

    “Many hospitals have not yet established a unified data management system, which is not conducive to the unified analysis of data and impacts the application of AI technology in the medical field.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most scholars believe that AI robots at this stage can only belong to the category of tools.

    “Most scholars believe that AI robots at this stage can only belong to the category of tools yet.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It is the current consensus in the AI industry that AI cannot be a responsible subject.

    “It is also the current consensus in the AI industry.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is limited transparency in the black box of algorithms, whose inherent logic is hidden even from developers.

    “there is limited transparency in the black box of algorithms, whose inherent logic is hidden even from developers”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Clinicians are not always able to explain their inferences perfectly, as they may make decisions based more on experience and intuition than on clear medical criteria.

    “clinicians are also not always able to explain their inferences perfectly, as they may make decisions based more on experience and intuition than on clear medical criteria.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Medical AI will belong to the category of medical devices for a considerable period of time, and its main function is to assist doctors in diagnosis and treatment.

    “medical AI will belong to the category of medical devices for a considerable period of time, and its main function is to assist doctors in diagnosis and treatment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Countries generally require or encourage medical device applicants to submit appropriate scientific research evidence to explain the scientific process and verify the safety and efficacy of the device at all stages of registration.

    “Countries generally require or encourage medical device applicants to submit appropriate scientific research evidence to explain the scientific process and verify the safety and efficacy of the device at all stages of registration-including premarket approval and postmarketing studies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    International cooperation faces many obstacles, such as cultural and legal systems differences in each country, which may lead to different attitudes and positions in the face of medical AI.

    “international cooperation also faces many obstacles, such as cultural and legal systems differences in each country, which may lead to different attitudes and positions in the face of medical AI.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the past, scientific and technological work was often the result of scientists setting up projects, the relevant departments or enterprises giving money, the government approving them, the public unaccountably affected, and humanities and social science experts cleaning up the mess.

    “In the past, scientific and technological work was often the result of scientists setting up projects, the relevant departments or enterprises giving money, the government approving them, the public unaccountably affected, and humanities and social science experts cleaning up the mess.”
16 of 16

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The adoption of AI in nursing raises critical ethical, social, and educational concerns.

    “Despite these promising developments, the adoption of AI in nursing raises critical ethical, social, and educational concerns.”

    From The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Background and Discussion describe ethical and social risks of medical AI, and the Discussion’s ‘Multi-participation and international cooperation’ section calls for training and education. The paper addresses healthcare broadly and specifies doctors’ AI literacy; it does not establish these concerns specifically for AI adoption in nursing. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ethical challenges such as data privacy breaches, algorithmic bias, and a lack of transparency in AI decision-making threaten to undermine patient trust and exacerbate health disparities.

    “Ethical challenges such as data privacy breaches, algorithmic bias, and a lack of transparency in AI decision-making processes threaten to undermine patient trust and exacerbate health disparities [7,8].”
  • Other practical frameworks exist with strategies to implement ethics and the governance of AI systems in health to separate the factors affecting trustworthy medical AI into design (data and algorithm aspects) and application, through controls strategies at both design and application phases.

    “Other practical frameworks exist. They count with strategies to implement ethics and the governance of AI systems in health to separate the factors affecting trustworthy medical AI into design (data and algorithm aspects) and application. This is done through controls strategies [136] at both design and application phases.”
  • AI lacks the legal status of a human being, leaving humans as the ultimate duty bearers.

    “From a legal perspective, AI lacks the legal status of a human being, leaving humans as the ultimate duty bearers [27].”

    From Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

  • Concerns regarding data privacy and security of patient information complicate research processes and hinder the integration of AI into clinical practice.

    “In addition, concerns regarding the data privacy and security of patient information complicate research processes and hinder the integration of AI into clinical practice [50].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Recalled surgical robot is identified by two different model names

    Minor

    The text identifies the recalled device as the ROSA Brain 3.0, but the cited FDA reference identifies it as the ROSA One 3.1 Brain Application.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. AMA (American Medical Association). Report of the Council on Long Range Planning and Development. 2018. https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2018-11/a18-clrpd-reports.pdf. Accessed 23 Jul 2022.
  2. Wang H, Meng XF, Wang Q, et al. Strategy for management and quality control of datasets in artificial intelligence medical device. China Med Devices. 2018;33(12):1–5.
  3. Xu Y, Ma XM, Yue Q, et al. Ethics of lung cancer image data and artificial intelligence. Med Soc. 2021;34(5):100–104
  4. Price W, Nicholson II. Medical AI and contextual bias. Harv J Law Technol. 2019;33:65–116.
  5. Liu LL, He YM, Liu XD. A survey on patients perceptions and trust in artificial intelligence healthcare. Chin Med Eth. 2019;32(8):986–90. https://doi.org/10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2019.08.07. · DOI
  6. Feldman R, Aldana E, Stein K. Artificial intelligence in the health care space: how we can trust what we cannot know. Stanf Law Policy Rev. 2019;30:399–419.
  7. Kamensky S. Artificial intelligence and technology in health care: overview and possible legal implications. DePaul J Health Care Law. 2020;21(3):1–13.
  8. Gan SP. How can robots have rights. Eth Res. 2017;3:126–30. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9115.2017.03.025. · DOI
  9. Jessica SA. From Jeopardy to Jaundice: the medical liability implications of Dr. Watson and other artificial intelligence systems. La Law Rev. 2013;73:1049.
  10. Chung J, Zink A. Hey Watson, can i sue you for malpractice? Examining the liability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Asia Pac J Health Law Eth. 2018;11(2):51–80.
  11. Weaver JF, Zheng ZF. How to sue a robot: liability and AI. Law Econ. 2019;1:140–60.
  12. Zhang L, Chen P. Critique of the theory of robot “personality” and the legal regulation of artificial intelligent objects. Academia. 2018;12:53–75. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1698.2018.12.006. · DOI
  13. IEEE. Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems, First Edition. 2016. https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/. Accessed 2 Dec 2022.
  14. Macnish K, Gauttier S. A pre-occupation with possession: the (non-) ownership of personal data. Big data and democracy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2020. p. 42–56.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z.-M.
Affiliations
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
Venue
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2023-01-13
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
7-7
ISSN
1472-6947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4315880904
Cited by
507
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 171 · 2025: 169 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 36
FWCI
20.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Social Science Fund of China (18ZDA322)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, trustworthy AI, AI ethics, AI governance, algorithmic bias, data quality, algorithmic opacity, algorithmic transparency, attribution of responsibility, health disparities, patient autonomy, AI regulation, ethical frameworks, legal status of AI, international cooperation
MeSH terms
Data Management, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Prognosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review