Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence
Open accessAbstract
Background: The growing application of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has brought technological breakthroughs to traditional diagnosis and treatment, but it is accompanied by many risks and challenges. These adverse effects are also seen as ethical issues and affect trustworthiness in medical AI and need to be managed through identification, prognosis and monitoring. Methods: We adopted a multidisciplinary approach and summarized five subjects that influence the trustworthiness of medical AI: data quality, algorithmic bias, opacity, safety and security, and responsibility attribution, and discussed these factors from the perspectives of technology, law, and healthcare stakeholders and institutions. The ethical framework of ethical values-ethical principles-ethical norms is used to propose corresponding ethical governance countermeasures for trustworthy medical AI from the ethical, legal, and regulatory aspects. Results: Medical data are primarily unstructured, lacking uniform and standardized annotation, and data quality will directly affect the quality of medical AI algorithm models. Algorithmic bias can affect AI clinical predictions and exacerbate health disparities. The opacity of algorithms affects patients’ and doctors’ trust in medical AI, and algorithmic errors or security vulnerabilities can pose significant risks and harm to patients. The involvement of medical AI in clinical practices may threaten doctors ‘and patients’ autonomy and dignity. When accidents occur with medical AI, the responsibility attribution is not clear. All these factors affect people’s trust in medical AI. Conclusions: In order to make medical AI trustworthy, at the ethical level, the ethical value orientation of promoting human health should first and foremost be considered as the top-level design. At the legal level, current medical AI does not have moral status and humans remain the duty bearers. At the regulatory level, strengthening data quality management, improving algorithm transparency and traceability to reduce algorithm bias, and regulating and reviewing the whole process of the AI industry to control risks are proposed. It is also necessary to encourage multiple parties to discuss and assess AI risks and social impacts, and to strengthen international cooperation and communication.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper argues that trustworthy medical AI depends on addressing five ethical/governance factors: data quality, algorithmic bias, opacity, safety and security, and responsibility attribution. It proposes governance through an ethical values–principles–norms framework, with humans remaining the responsible actors and with stronger data management, transparency/traceability, whole-process review, multi-party participation, and international cooperation.
Key findings
- The paper identifies five factors affecting trustworthiness in medical AI: data quality, algorithmic bias, opacity, safety and security, and responsibility attribution. Poor data quality, including unstructured and inconsistently annotated medical data, directly affects algorithm quality; algorithmic bias can exacerbate health disparities; opacity affects patient and clinician trust; safety/security failures can harm patients; and responsibility attribution remains unclear when accidents occur.
- It reports illustrative harms and market/regulatory figures: the health AI market was estimated to grow tenfold from 2020 to 2026, reaching $45.2 billion in 2026; U.S. surgical robots were linked to at least 1,391 harm-causing incidents and 144 deaths between 2000 and 2013; 15% of global data breaches came from healthcare in 2017; and as of 2020 the FDA had approved 222 AI medical device products while Europe had approved 240 with European conformity certification.
- It cites algorithmic bias examples, including an AI for melanoma diagnosis being difficult to apply to darker races because of few medical images of darker races, and a health decision algorithm incorrectly using health care costs rather than disease to represent health need, leading it to conclude Black people were healthier despite being much sicker in the datasets.
- It argues that current medical AI lacks moral status and should be treated as a tool; humans remain the duty bearers. Governance proposals include strengthening data quality management, promoting data sharing with privacy protections, reducing algorithmic bias, increasing transparency and traceability, regulating and reviewing the whole AI lifecycle, encouraging multi-party risk assessment, and strengthening international cooperation.
Methods
- The paper uses a multidisciplinary approach and summarizes five subjects influencing trustworthy medical AI: data quality, algorithmic bias, opacity, safety and security, and responsibility attribution.
- It discusses these factors from technology, law, and healthcare stakeholder/institution perspectives, analyzing both the design level (technical reliability) and application level (human impact).
- It applies an ethical governance framework of ethical values–ethical principles–ethical norms to propose countermeasures from ethical, legal, and regulatory aspects. No empirical sample, dataset, or statistical analysis is reported.
Limitations
- The paper does not state limitations in a dedicated limitations section.
- Evident from the text: it is a conceptual/normative review rather than an empirical study, with no primary data collection, systematic review protocol, or formal evaluation of the proposed governance measures.
- Evident from the text: many supporting examples are drawn from news reports, regulatory actions, and prior literature rather than from a systematic evidence synthesis, and the governance proposals are not tested for implementation feasibility or effectiveness.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 62 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisereasoning
The quality of data directly determines the quality of medical AI.
“The quality of data directly determines the quality of medical AI”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
All these factors affect people's trust in medical AI.
“All these factors affect people’s trust in medical AI”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Algorithms can lead to biased results.
“However, algorithms can also lead to biased results”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Sharon T. Self-Tracking for health and the quantified self: re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philos Technol. 2017;30:93–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0215-5. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
The accuracy of the data annotation determines the quality of the dataset.
“The accuracy of the data annotation determines the quality of the dataset”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
AI systems are only as good as the data provided to them.
“AI systems are only as good as the data provided to them”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Johnson SLJ. AI, machine learning, and ethics in health care. J Leg Med. 2020;39:427–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2019.1690604. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Human-induced bias is intentionally or unintentionally written by the developers because individuals are always influenced by their own moral perceptions and relevant interests, which affects data training.
“Human-induced bias is intentionally or unintentionally written by the developers because individuals are always influenced by their own moral perceptions and relevant interests, which affects data training”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [25] Monteith S, Glenn T. Automated decision-making and big data: concerns for people with mental illness. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016;18(12):112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-016-0746-6. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Howard A, Borenstein J. The ugly truth about ourselves and our robot creations: the problem of bias and social inequity. Sci Eng Eth. 2018;24(5):1521–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9975-2. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The European Union Draft Report gave intelligent devices the independent status of electronic persons with specific rights and obligations, making them eligible for liability for damage caused by themselves.
“In the Draft Report with Recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics [62] the European Union has given intelligent devices the independent status of electronic persons with specific rights and obligations, making them eligible for liability for damage caused by themselves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] European Commission. European Parliament, Committee on Legal Affairs: Draft Report with Recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics. 2016. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML%2BCOMPARL%2BPE-582.443%2B01%2BDOC%2BPDF%2BV0//EN. Accessed 28 Jul 2022.
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Whether algorithmic safety issues can be effectively addressed is related to whether medical AI can be widely adopted on a large scale.
“whether algorithmic safety issues can be effectively addressed is related to whether medical AI can be widely adopted on a large scale”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A malicious hacker can deceive an AI system with subtle interference to harm humans.
“It suggests that a malicious hacker can deceive an AI system with subtle interference to harm humans”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Medical AI is still a tool in human medical activities at present.
“Therefore, medical AI is still a tool in human medical activities at present, and humans should be responsible for AI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
AI applications have vulnerabilities that could be hacked or maliciously tampered with and produce unsafe outcomes.
“AI applications have vulnerabilities that could be hacked or maliciously tampered with and produce unsafe outcomes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] Challen R, Denny J, Pitt M, et al. Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(3):231–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008370. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There are also potential risks when a care robot is involved in patient and elderly care.
“There are also potential risks when a care robot is involved in patient and elderly care”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] Price WN, Gerke S, Cohen IG. Potential liability for physicians using artificial intelligence. JAMA. 2019;322:1765–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.15064. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The European Civil Law Rules in Robotics introduced the rule that a developer's liability is inversely proportional to the autonomy of the AI robot.
“It has introduced the rule that“a developer’s liability is inversely proportional to the autonomy of the AI robot” in the European Civil Law Rules in Robotics (ECLR), i.e., the more autonomous the robot, the less the trainer's liability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] European Commission. European Parliament, Committee on Legal Affairs: Draft Report with Recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics. 2016. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML%2BCOMPARL%2BPE-582.443%2B01%2BDOC%2BPDF%2BV0//EN. Accessed 28 Jul 2022.
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Introducing AI into treatment decision-making may reintroduce the paternalistic model of 'computer knows best'.
“Introducing AI into treatment decision-making may reintroduce the paternalistic model of “computer knows best”.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
When medical AI goes wrong, it can cause serious harm to people.
“When medical AI goes wrong, it can cause serious harm to people”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
AI cannot be a responsible subject.
“Therefore, AI cannot be a responsible subject [65].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Coeckelbergh M. Artificial intelligence, responsibility attribution, and a relational justification of explainability. Sci Eng Eth. 2020;26(4):2051–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00146-8. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: It is the current consensus in the AI industry that AI cannot be a responsible subject.
- Premisecitation
These four principles have become universally recognized as bioethical principles to guide medical and research decisions.
“These four principles have become universally recognized as bioethical principles to guide medical and research decisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The opacity problem arises mainly in the second generation of AI, data-based machine learning.
“The opacity problem arises mainly in the second generation of AI, data-based machine learning”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] AI in the UK: ready, willing and able? United Kingdom: authority of the house of lords. 2018. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldai/100/100.pdf. Accessed 25 Jul 2022.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Computers recommend treatments based on specific parameters that may not actually best reflect the values and preferences of a particular patient.
“Computers recommend treatments based on specific parameters that may not actually best reflect the values and preferences of a particular patient [60].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] McDougall RJ. Computer knows best? The need for value-flexibility in medical AI. J Med Eth. 2019;45(3):156–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-105118. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
There are also risks associated with the potentially autonomous functions of AI applications.
“there are also risks associated with the potentially autonomous functions of AI applications”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The risks of medical AI comes more from the algorithms.
“The risks of medical AI comes more from the algorithms”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
No matter how scientific AI is, there is always the possibility of making mistakes.
“Therefore, no matter how scientific AI is, there is always the possibility of making mistakes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Lack of transparency in the black box of algorithms may reduce the credibility of AI medical devices.
“there is limited transparency in the black box of algorithms, whose inherent logic is hidden even from developers, and the lack of transparency may reduce the credibility of AI medical devices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: There is limited transparency in the black box of algorithms, whose inherent logic is hidden even from developers.
- Premisecitation
Many countries have incorporated quality management of training data and data trainers into their regulatory frameworks to ensure data quality.
“Many countries have incorporated quality management of training data and data trainers into their regulatory frameworks to ensure data quality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [81] Deep Learning Assisted Decision-Making Medical Device Software Approval Points. China National Medical Products Administration [EB/OL] (2019–7–3). https://www.cmde.org.cn/xwdt/shpgzgg/gztg/20190703141714991.html
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Many drugs used in clinics may not be fully understood initially.
“Many of the drugs used in clinics may not be fully understood initially.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [93] London AJ. Artificial intelligence and black-box medical decisions: accuracy versus explainability. Hastings Cent Rep. 2019;49(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.973. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [94] Vane JR, Botting RM. The mechanism of action of aspirin. Thromb Res. 2003;110(5–6):255–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-3848(03)00379-7. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
There may be an empty field of responsibility.
“That means there may be an empty field of responsibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Technologists use differential privacy to create a barrier between hackers and data to prevent data from being restored after a breach.
“Technologists also use differential privacy to create a barrier between hackers and data to prevent data from being restored after a breach [92].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] Papernot N, Abadi M, Erlingsson L, et al. Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Data. 2016. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1610.05755 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 71
- May combine two claims. 66
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationData-induced bias refers to the bias when the training data is not representative or insufficient that affects the algorithm model.
“Data-induced bias refers to the bias when the training data is not representative or insufficient that affects the algorithm model”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] Mooney SJ, Pejaver V. Big data in public health: terminology, machine learning, and privacy. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39(1):95–112. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014208. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Senders JT, Zaki MM, Karhade AV, et al. An introduction and overview of machine learning in neurosurgical care. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018;160(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3385-8. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlgorithms inherit human biases, and such biases are likely to be reinforced and amplified with the accumulation of data and iterations of algorithms.
“Not only do algorithms inherit human biases, but such biases are also likely to be reinforced and amplified with the accumulation of data and iterations of algorithms”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningMost of the texts in TCM are unstructured data and Chinese medicine has more non-standardized expressions, manual annotation is extremely costly and difficult, which greatly affects data quality.
“since most of the texts in TCM are unstructured data and Chinese medicine has more non-standardized expressions, manual annotation is extremely costly and difficult, which greatly affects data quality”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese biases may be continuously replicated and amplified in algorithm and lead to biased prediction results, which may cause discriminatory treatment of certain people in medical care and even lead to medical safety accidents.
“These biases may be continuously replicated and amplified in algorithm and lead to biased prediction results, which may cause discriminatory treatment of certain people in medical care and even lead to medical safety accidents”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe opacity of algorithms affects patients' and doctors' trust in medical AI.
“The opacity of algorithms affects patients’ and doctors’ trust in medical AI”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn healthcare, biased algorithms may underestimate or overestimate certain patients' risks, and unrepresentative data may consolidate or exacerbate health disparities.
“In healthcare, biased algorithms may underestimate or overestimate certain patients’ risks, and unrepresentative data may consolidate or exacerbate health disparities”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenData quality directly affects the quality of medical AI algorithm models.
“data quality will directly affect the quality of medical AI algorithm models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere are three possible reasons for opacity: algorithms are trade secrets; inability of lay people to understand; complex nature of algorithms.
“There are three possible reasons for opacity: (1) algorithms are trade secrets that companies intentionally hide; (2) the inability of lay people to understand programming and algorithmic techniques; (3) the complex nature of the algorithms themselves, which are incomprehensible to humans”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Burrell J. How the machine “thinks”: understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data Soc. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenFive subjects influence the trustworthiness of medical AI: data quality, algorithmic bias, opacity, safety and security, and responsibility attribution.
“We adopted a multidisciplinary approach and summarized five subjects that influence the trustworthiness of medical AI: data quality, algorithmic bias, opacity, safety and security, and responsibility attribution”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenAlgorithmic bias includes both human-induced bias and data-induced bias.
“Algorithmic bias includes both human-induced bias and data-induced bias”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAt present, there are problems in the data of medical AI, such as data errors and omissions, lack of unified metadata standards, difficulties in data fusion, lack of data management, non-standardized strategy for data cleaning, and much medical data is stored in unstructured forms.
“At present, there are some problems in the data of medical AI, such as data errors and omissions in the original data entry process, lack of unified metadata standards, difficulties in data fusion, lack of data management, non-standardized strategy for data cleaning, and much medical data is stored in unstructured forms such as text and images”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAlgorithmic bias can affect AI clinical predictions and exacerbate health disparities.
“Algorithmic bias can affect AI clinical predictions and exacerbate health disparities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAlgorithmic errors or security vulnerabilities can pose significant risks and harm to patients.
“algorithmic errors or security vulnerabilities can pose significant risks and harm to patients”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe involvement of medical AI in clinical practices may threaten doctors' and patients' autonomy and dignity.
“The involvement of medical AI in clinical practices may threaten doctors ‘and patients’ autonomy and dignity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenDeep learning is a typical "black box", it is opaque and uninterpretable, which makes the biases difficult to be detected.
“deep learning is a typical “black box”, it is opaque and uninterpretable, which makes the biases difficult to be detected”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMedical data are primarily unstructured, lacking uniform and standardized annotation.
“Medical data are primarily unstructured, lacking uniform and standardized annotation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWatson cannot independently and synthetically evaluate medical problems, nor can it independently conceptualize and search for new relevant information, because it lacks the higher level of cognition required for critical thinking and the diversity of solutions ranked by intrinsic value.
“Although Watson is good at answering questions, it cannot independently and synthetically evaluate medical problems, nor can it independently conceptualize and search for new relevant information because it lacks the higher level of cognition required for critical thinking and the diversity of solutions ranked by the intrinsic value [67].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] Chung J, Zink A. Hey Watson, can i sue you for malpractice? Examining the liability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Asia Pac J Health Law Eth. 2018;11(2):51–80.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMuch medical institution data is stored in the cloud or third-party servers, which is more vulnerable to hacking.
“Much medical institution data is stored in the cloud or third-party servers, which is more vulnerable to hacking”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe hybrid approach combines the top-down and bottom-up approaches and is the current mainstream of AI algorithm design.
“The hybrid approach combines the first two and is the current mainstream of AI algorithm design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [77] Wallach W, Allen C, Smit I. Machine morality: bottom-up and top-down approaches for modelling human moral faculties. AI Soc. 2008;22(4):565–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0099-0. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [78] Reddy S, Allan S, Coghlan S, et al. A governance model for the application of AI in health care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019;27(3):491–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz192. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMedical AI replaces certain tasks previously performed by physicians, changing the doctor-patient relationship and posing a dilemma in the division of ethical responsibilities.
“Medical AI replaces certain tasks previously performed by physicians, which will undoubtedly change the relationship between doctors and patients, and poses a dilemma in the division of ethical responsibilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBeauchamp and Childress first proposed four major principles of bioethics: respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice.
“Beauchamp T.L. and Childress J.F. first proposed four major principles of bioethics in their book Principles of Biomedical Ethics: respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice[76]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenHumans have no consensus on ethical dilemmas like the trolley problem, and it is unlikely to generate an ethical standard that everyone agrees on.
“In fact, humans have no consensus on ethical dilemmas like the “trolley problem”. It is unlikely to generate an ethical standard that everyone agrees on to deal with the issues, which also poses an ethical challenge for moral algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAI challenges the perceived authority of clinicians and may influence their independent judgment.
“In addition, AI challenges the perceived authority of clinicians and may influence their independent judgment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThere is a huge gap between ethical orientation and application.
“Although people agree with ethical values, there is a huge gap between ethical orientation and application.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisereasoningThe limited IT power of medical institutions also makes it difficult to ensure data security.
“The limited IT power of medical institutions also makes it difficult to ensure data security”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisereasoningHow to find a balance between medical data sharing and patient privacy protection is also an ethical problem faced in medical AI applications.
“how to find a balance between medical data sharing and patient privacy protection is also an ethical problem faced in medical AI applications”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe value orientation of AI ethics and medical ethics is the same: to promote human health and well-being, and the bottom line is to do no harm to humans.
“The value orientation of AI ethics and medical ethics is the same, that is, to promote human health and well-being, and the bottom line is to do no harm to humans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe corresponding legal system has not yet been improved, resulting in the lack of effective regulation and restraint in medical data collection, use and privacy protection.
“The corresponding legal system has not yet been improved, resulting in the lack of effective regulation and restraint in medical data collection, use and privacy protection”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe third type of opacity is inherent to machine learning and is also known as the algorithmic "black box".
“The third type of opacity is inherent to machine learning and is also known as the algorithmic “black box””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDue to the many stakeholders, doctors cannot simply be blamed in the application of medical AI; more responsible stakeholders such as developers, algorithm designers, training data providers, and regulators need to be brought in.
“It can be seen that, due to the many stakeholders, we cannot simply blame the doctors in the application of medical AI, but need to bring in more responsible stakeholders, such as developers of medical AI, designers of algorithms, providers of training data, regulators of AI, etc.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCurrent medical AI is only an auxiliary tool used by doctors to diagnose and treat diseases, and is not qualified to be a responsible subject.
“Current medical AI is only an auxiliary tool used by doctors to diagnose and treat diseases, not qualified to be a responsible subject.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Most scholars believe that AI robots at this stage can only belong to the category of tools.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMedical AI, as a technology, contains the values of the developer or designer; therefore, those involved have an ethical responsibility for AI products.
“Medical AI, as a technology, contains the values of the developer or designer; therefore, those involved have an ethical responsibility for AI products.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe law is a mandatory norm with lagging defects and a long legislative cycle, so it can only be 'hindsight' and cannot provide timely and effective protection measures.
“The law is a mandatory norm with certain lagging defects, and the legislative process is characterized by a harshness and long cycle, and more often than not, it can only be “hindsight” and cannot provide timely and effective protection measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMedical AI is still just a machine or program at this stage. It cannot adjust its actions to the actual situation and must rely on doctors to manipulate the machinery or make the final decision.
“medical AI is still just a machine or program at this stage. It cannot adjust its actions to the actual situation and must rely on doctors to manipulate the machinery or make the final decision”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningHealthcare data has high research and business value, but data breach occurs frequently.
“Healthcare data also has high research and business value, but data breach occurs frequently”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIt is impossible to develop a code that covers all possibilities. Therefore, safety flaws in AI may endanger more patients than the possibility of a single misdiagnosis by a doctor because automated systems will replicate more errors.
“It is impossible to develop a code that covers all possibilities. Therefore, safety flaws in AI may endanger more patients than the possibility of a single misdiagnosis by a doctor because automated systems will replicate more errors”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Macnish K. Unblinking eyes: the ethics of automating surveillance. Eth Inf Technol. 2012;14:151–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-012-9291-0. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe opacity of the algorithm creates "ignorance" among human agents and will affect the trust of patients and clinicians in AI tools.
“The opacity of the algorithm creates “ignorance” among human agents and will affect the trust of patients and clinicians in AI tools”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThis automated setup means that even if the AI gives up control, none of the humans has time to intervene.
“This automated setup means that even if the AI gives up control, none of the humans has time to intervene, so who is responsible for the accident?”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAI neither meets the traditional criteria of free will nor is aware of what it is doing.
“From Aristotle's “action must originate from the agent, and a person cannot be unaware of what he or she is doing”, AI neither meets the traditional criteria of free will nor is aware of what it is doing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Coeckelbergh M. Artificial intelligence, responsibility attribution, and a relational justification of explainability. Sci Eng Eth. 2020;26(4):2051–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00146-8. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA 2022 NHTSA report showed that in an investigation of 16 Tesla crashes, several showed Autopilot gave back control of the car to the human driver in less than a second on average before the crash, resulting in 15 injuries and one fatality.
“In 2022, a report by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) showed that in an investigation of 16 Tesla crashes, several showed that Autopilot (Automated Assisted Driving) gave back control of the car to the human driver in “less than a second” on average before the crash and resulted in a total of 15 injuries and one fatality [70].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] Gitlin JM. NHTSA data shows Teslas using Autopilot crashed 273 times in less than a year. 2022. https://arstechnica.com/cars/2022/06/teslas-using-autopilot-crashed-273-times-in-less-than-a-year/. Accessed 28 Jul 2022.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDoctors seem to be more repulsed by medical AI than patients. Based on an inherent mindset emphasizing science and logic, doctors are less willing to trust and rely on things they cannot explain.
“doctors seem to be more repulsed by medical AI than patients. Based on an inherent mindset emphasizing science and logic, doctors are less willing to trust and rely on things they cannot explain”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Feldman R, Aldana E, Stein K. Artificial intelligence in the health care space: how we can trust what we cannot know. Stanf Law Policy Rev. 2019;30:399–419.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningEthics and morality become an effective complement to the legal system.
“Therefore, ethics and morality become an effective complement to the legal system, and AI technology innovation must be carried out in accordance with ethical requirements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome scholars argue that although AI may surpass humans in many aspects, AI does not possess free will essentially and does not have moral subjectivity.
“Some scholars argue that although AI may surpass humans in many aspects, they do not possess free will essentially and does not have moral subjectivity [63, 64].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [63] Gan SP. How can robots have rights. Eth Res. 2017;3:126–30. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9115.2017.03.025. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [64] Sparrow R. Killer robots. J Appl Philos. 2007;24(1):62–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00346.x. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMedical chatbots provide diagnostic and treatment recommendations in order to reduce unnecessary doctor visits. However, these medical chatbots may also harm patients if they are not continuously updated, checked, or regulated.
“medical chatbots provide diagnostic and treatment recommendations in order to reduce unnecessary doctor visits. However, these medical chatbots may also harm patients if they are not continuously updated, checked, or regulated”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Katznelson G, Gerke S. The need for health AI ethics in medical school education. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2021;26:1447–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10040-3. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe main situations of medical data breaches include cyber attacks such as hacker intrusion and unauthorized access, and even theft or loss of data by insiders in possession of the data.
“The main situations of medical data breaches include cyber attacks such as hacker intrusion and unauthorized access, and even theft or loss of data by insiders in possession of the data”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe data breach is also a security concern.
“The data breach is also a security concern”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost current medical AI algorithms are trained using historical data from retrospective studies. When encountering real-world data that differ from that in the training datasets, the performance of AI may be worse, leading to clinical risks.
“most current medical AI algorithms are trained using historical data from retrospective studies. When encountering real-world data that differ from that in the training datasets, the performance of AI may be worse, leading to clinical risks”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] Kelly CJ, Karthikesalingam A, Suleyman M, et al. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIt is controversial to grant personality and rights to robots.
“However, it is controversial to grant personality and rights to robots.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEven if a medical AI could perform computer and mathematical-level explanations, it would be difficult to translate them into meaningful medical explanations. It is because AI is always a statistical correlation analysis rather than a medical causality analysis.
“even if a medical AI could perform computer and mathematical-level explanations, it would be difficult to translate them into meaningful medical explanations. It is because AI is always a statistical correlation analysis rather than a medical causality analysis”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Kamensky S. Artificial intelligence and technology in health care: overview and possible legal implications. DePaul J Health Care Law. 2020;21(3):1–13.
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe common value goal in published ethical principles is to put the interests of human beings at the forefront; the development and use of AI must promote the good of mankind.
“The common value goal mentioned in these ethical principles is to put the interests of human beings at the forefront. That is to say, the development and use of AI must promote the good of mankind.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [71] IEEE. Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems, First Edition. 2016. https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/. Accessed 2 Dec 2022.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [72] Future of life institute. Asilomar AI Principles. 2017. https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/asilomar-ai-principles/. Accessed 2 Dec 2022.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [73] The High-Level Expert Group on AI. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. 2019. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai. Accessed 2 Dec 2022.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAt the beginning of its application, doctors may suffer from machine malfunctions due to inexperience and unskilled operation, some of which can have serious consequences. Patients would not necessarily have suffered this harm if not for the use of medical AI.
“At the beginning of its application, doctors may suffer from machine malfunctions due to inexperience and unskilled operation, some of which (e.g., operating errors in surgical robots) can have serious consequences. Patients would not necessarily have suffered this harm if not for the use of medical AI”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Turing test suggests that complex AI may have a certain level of consciousness.
“The Turing test suggests that complex AI may have a certain level of consciousness [61].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Warwick K, Shah H. Passing the turing test does not mean the end of humanity. Cognit Comput. 2016;8(3):409–19. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe medical AI Watson system passed the U.S. physician licensing exam in 2012.
“The medical AI Watson system passed the U.S. physician licensing exam in 2012 [66].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] Jessica SA. From Jeopardy to Jaundice: the medical liability implications of Dr. Watson and other artificial intelligence systems. La Law Rev. 2013;73:1049.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExplaining deep learning-based medical AI is almost impossible, which is related to the connection complexity and mathematical abstraction of deep neural networks. People cannot explain how the machine makes judgments.
“explaining deep learning-based medical AI is almost impossible, which is related to the connection complexity and mathematical abstraction of deep neural networks. People cannot explain how the machine makes judgments”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Grote T, Berens P. On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare. J Med Eth. 2020;46(3):205–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105586. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPatients are generally repulsed by unexplained AI interventions in diagnostic and treatment sessions. They usually only accept AI to handle administrative matters such as registration, bill payment, and guidance.
“patients are generally repulsed by unexplained AI interventions in diagnostic and treatment sessions. They usually only accept AI to handle administrative matters such as registration, bill payment, and guidance”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Liu LL, He YM, Liu XD. A survey on patients perceptions and trust in artificial intelligence healthcare. Chin Med Eth. 2019;32(8):986–90. https://doi.org/10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2019.08.07. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAI involvement may diminish the patient's subject position in clinical practices, undermine shared decision-making between doctors and patients, and threaten patient autonomy and dignity.
“Thus, AI involvement may diminish the patient's subject position in clinical practices, undermine shared decision-making between doctors and patients, and threaten patient’s autonomy and dignity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: What is optimal for one patient in the same clinical situation may not be optimal for other patients.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe safety issues of medical AI are the risks and harms that occur in its practices, such as program errors, being affected by cybersecurity, the need for adequate testing, difficult software certification, etc., covering various legal and ethical issues.
“The safety issues of medical AI are the risks and harms that occur in its practices, such as program errors, being affected by cybersecurity, the need for adequate testing, difficult software certification, etc., covering various legal and ethical issues”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] O’Sullivan S, Nevejans N, Allen C, et al. Legal, regulatory, and ethical frameworks for develop-ment of standards in artificial intelligence(AI) and autonomous robotic surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2019;15(1):e1968. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1968. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is a consensus among computer scientists that an inherent tension is between the performance and explainability of machine learning, with the best-performing algorithms being the least transparent and those that provide precise explanatory algorithms often being less accurate.
“there is a consensus among computer scientists that an inherent tension is between the performance and explainability of machine learning, with the best-performing algorithms being the least transparent and those that provide precise explanatory algorithms often being less accurate”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Holzinger A, Biemann C, Pattichis CS. What Do We Need to Build Explainable AI Systems for the Medical Domain?. arXiv, 2017. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.09923 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe algorithmic black box makes models lack explainability and are difficult to proofread. If the algorithm is flawed or incorrect, the output will lead to even greater errors, which will most likely cause diagnostic errors, harm human health, and even deprive human lives.
“the algorithmic black box makes models lack explainability and are difficult to proofread. If the algorithm is flawed or incorrect, the output will lead to even greater errors, which will most likely cause diagnostic errors, harm human health, and even deprive human lives”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisereasoningA gap exists between the machine's rule-based conditions and probabilistic statistics, and the human judgment mechanism, which is based on emotion and epiphanic meditation.
“A gap still exists between the machine’s rule-based conditions and probabilistic statistics, and the human judgment mechanism, which is based on emotion and epiphanic meditation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe form of the function that relates input data to output is too complex for non-specialists to understand, and even the designer may not be able to understand the logic of the calculation.
“The form of the function that relates the input data to the output is too complex for non-specialists to understand, and even the designer may not be able to understand the logic of the calculation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningOnly with the participation of all relevant sectors of society and multiple parties can an ethical and publicly acceptable medical AI be developed.
“Only with the participation of all relevant sectors of society and multiple parties can an ethical and publicly acceptable medical AI be developed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningTrust in AI will improve through a more transparent development process with a better understanding of algorithms and AI functions.
“Trust in AI will improve through a more transparent development process with a better understanding of algorithms and AI functions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAspirin was used for about 70 years for its antipyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory clinical effects, but its pharmacological mechanisms were not understood until later.
“aspirin was used for about 70 years for its antipyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory clinical effects, but its pharmacological mechanisms were not understood until later [93, 94].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [93] London AJ. Artificial intelligence and black-box medical decisions: accuracy versus explainability. Hastings Cent Rep. 2019;49(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.973. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [94] Vane JR, Botting RM. The mechanism of action of aspirin. Thromb Res. 2003;110(5–6):255–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-3848(03)00379-7. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAnonymous data cannot be used to identify a person and is therefore not subject to GDPR rules; if a company collects anonymous data, it does not need to obtain the consent of users.
“Anonymous data means that it cannot be used to identify a person and is therefore not subject to the GDPR rules, which means that if a company collects anonymous data, it does not need to obtain the consent of the users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] EU: General Data Protection Regulation. 2018. https://gdpr-info.eu. Accessed 28 Jul 2022.
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningDoctors are not exempt from liability because they are the main actors in diagnosing patients.
“At the same time, doctors are not exempt from liability because they are the main actors in diagnosing patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlgorithm transparency, though not equal to explainability, will form a powerful deterrent and encourage more diverse subjects to participate in supervision, greatly compensating for the lack of supervision of regulatory authorities.
“Although algorithm transparency is not equal to algorithm explainability, it will form a powerful deterrent and encourage more diverse subjects, such as medical institutions, insurance companies, and social security institutions, to participate in supervision, which will greatly compensate for the lack of supervision of regulatory authorities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIf software development organizations were to require patient consent for each use of aggregated data, it would inevitably increase the cost of data use.
“In practice, however, if software development organizations were to require patient consent for each use of aggregated data, it would inevitably increase the cost of data use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationManson and O'Neill argue that more specific consent is not always ethically better and is difficult to achieve in practice; consent requires unique communicative transactions.
“Manson and O’Neill [87] argue that more specific consent is not always ethically better and is difficult to achieve in practice. Consent requires unique communicative transactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [87] Manson NC, O’Neill O. Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationFrom the perspective of human benefits, it is unethical not to use existing clinical data to develop tools to benefit all humanity.
“From the perspective of human benefits, it is also unethical not to use existing clinical data to develop tools to benefit all humanity [91].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91] Larson DB, Magnus DC, Lungren MP, et al. Ethics of using and sharing clinical imaging data for artificial Intelligence: a proposed framework. Radiology. 2020;295(3):675–82. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020192536. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn the third scenario, the related people are scrupulous in their duties but still cannot prevent the medical AI from making an incorrect diagnosis that leads to the patients' misfortune; there is no clear evidence of who is responsible, or responsibility cannot be attributed to any individual.
“In the third scenario, the related people are scrupulous in their duties, but still cannot prevent the medical AI from making an incorrect diagnosis that leads to the patients’ misfortune. There is no clear evidence of who is responsible, or we cannot attribute responsibility to any individual.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFloridi proposed a principle of moral responsibility of faultless responsibility, meaning that no one is at fault but they are still responsible for it.
“Floridi proposed a principle of moral responsibility of faultless responsibility, which means that no one is at fault, but they are still responsible for it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [79] Floridi L, Peng C. Faultless responsibility: on the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018;374(2083):0112. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3835211. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenExisting medical AIs are not moral enablers and do not have the ability to think and make decisions independently and cannot be considered as duty bearers.
“In the previous section, we have elaborated that existing medical AIs are not moral enablers and do not have the ability to think and make decisions independently and cannot be considered as duty bearers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn either approach, AI's response to the causality dilemma remains inadequate, and the threat to human moral subjectivity by allowing AI to form universal ethical guidelines spontaneously is even more deadly.
“However, in either approach, AI’s response to the causality dilemma remains inadequate, and the threat to human moral subjectivity by allowing AI to form universal ethical guidelines spontaneously is even more deadly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIt is ethical to dispense with re-informed consent for data use under conditions that ensure data security and do not compromise patient privacy, as long as a sound ethical review system is in place.
“We believe that it is ethical to dispense with re-informed consent for data use under conditions that ensure data security and do not compromise patient privacy, as long as a sound ethical review system is in place.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMedical AI does not have moral status at this stage, and humans remain the responsibility bearers.
“At the legal level, we clarified that medical AI does not have moral status at this stage, and humans remain the responsibility bearers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMedicine itself is potentially risky and uncertain.
“Medicine itself is potentially risky and uncertain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAt the current level of medical AI development, doctors are still in the position of supervising and should not let machines make final decisions without their permission.
“At the current level of medical AI development, doctors are still in the position of supervising and they should not let machines make final decisions without their permission.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationGDPR requires operators to allow users to express a desire for personal data to be 'forgotten', and fines for violating GDPR can be as high as 4% of the global revenue of the fined organization.
“For example, operators are required to allow users to express a desire for personal data to be “forgotten”, i.e., “I don’t want you to remember my past data and I want you not to use my data for modeling purposes from now on”. At the same time, the consequences of violating GDPR are severe, and fines can be as high as 4% of the global revenue of the fined organization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] EU: General Data Protection Regulation. 2018. https://gdpr-info.eu. Accessed 28 Jul 2022.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPatients' clinical data have potential medical value and should be widely shared to promote the health and well-being of all humans.
“Patients’ clinical data have potential medical value and should be widely shared to promote the health and well-being of all humans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningInterpretability is not a necessary or sufficient condition for accountability.
“Interpretability is not a necessary or sufficient condition for accountability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn 2018, the EU introduced the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the first bill on personal data privacy protection; unlike previous industry regulations, it is a truly enforceable law with specific and strict requirements.
“In 2018, the EU introduced the first bill on personal data privacy protection-General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) [86]. Unlike previous industry regulations, this is a truly enforceable law with specific and strict requirements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] EU: General Data Protection Regulation. 2018. https://gdpr-info.eu. Accessed 28 Jul 2022.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChina's Deep Learning Assisted Decision-Making Medical Device Software Approval Points requires quality control of training data, diversity of data sources, and subdivision of data sets into training, validation, and testing sets with different acquisition requirements.
“For example, China’s Deep Learning Assisted Decision-Making Medical Device Software Approval Points [81] requires quality control of training data, and should ensure diversity of data sources, with data collected from multiple medical institutions at different geographic and hierarchical levels whenever possible. The Approval points further subdivide the data sets into training sets (for algorithm”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [81] Deep Learning Assisted Decision-Making Medical Device Software Approval Points. China National Medical Products Administration [EB/OL] (2019–7–3). https://www.cmde.org.cn/xwdt/shpgzgg/gztg/20190703141714991.html
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMacnish and Gauttier argue that it is not appropriate to talk about our relationship with data in terms of ownership; there are only weak philosophical grounds for giving citizens control of 'their' data; control should be based around custody of data and the potential for harm.
“Macnish and Gauttier [82] argue that it's not appropriate to talk about our relationship with data in terms of ownership. There are only weak philosophical grounds on giving citizens control of ‘their’ data. Control should be based around custody of data and the potential for harm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82] Macnish K, Gauttier S. A pre-occupation with possession: the (non-) ownership of personal data. Big data and democracy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2020. p. 42–56.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRespect for personal privacy is a crucial ethical principle in health care because privacy is linked to personal identity and autonomy.
“Respect for personal privacy is a crucial ethical principle in health care because privacy is linked to personal identity and autonomy [84].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] Cath C. Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018;376(2133):20180080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0080. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenCurrent AI technology essentially obtains data by measuring the real world, extracts algorithmic models from the data, and uses the models to make relevant predictions.
“Current AI technology essentially obtains data by measuring the real world, extracts algorithmic models from the data, and uses the models to make relevant predictions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationA few companies are keen to propose ethical standards rather than binding rules because there is no substantial penalty if they change or disregard ethical standards.
“A few companies are keen to propose ethical standards rather than binding rules. The reasons for this are apparent because there is no substantial penalty if they change or disregard ethical standards under this circumstance [80].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] Calo R. Artificial intelligence policy: a primer and roadmap. UC Davis Law Rev. 2017;2:399–436. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3015350. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAs of 2020, the FDA has approved 222 AI medical device products, and Europe has approved 240 AI medical device products with European conformity certification.
“As of 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a total of 222 AI medical device products, and Europe has approved a total of 240 AI medical device products with European conformity certification [97].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [97] Ujm A, Pd B, Pknv B. Approval of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based medical devices in the USA and Europe (2015–20): a comparative analysis. Lancet Digits Health. 2021;3:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30292-2. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe main obstacle to data sharing is the ownership of data.
“The main obstacle to data sharing is the ownership of data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome scholars proposed more lenient forms of informed consent, such as broad consent and blanket consent, to facilitate practical implementation; however, the moral rationality for these informed consents remains controversial.
“Some scholars proposed more lenient forms of informed consent, such as broad consent and blanket consent, to facilitate practical implementation [88, 89]. However, the moral rationality for these informed consents remains controversial.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [88] Virani AH, Longstaff H. Ethical considerations in biobanks: how a public health ethics perspective sheds new light on old controversies. J Genet Couns. 2015;24(3):428–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9781-9. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [89] Kaufman D, Bollinger J, Dvoskin R, et al. Preferences for opt-in and opt-out enrollment and consent models in biobank research: a national survey of Veterans Administration patients. Genet Med. 2012;14(9):787–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2012.45. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe algorithms of medical AI are based on pre-existing human experience.
“In addition, the algorithms of medical AI are based on the pre-existing human experience.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHealthcare data are sensitive information about a person and are related to personal privacy.
“Healthcare data are sensitive information about a person [23, 83] which is also related to personal privacy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [23] Char DS, Shah NH, Magnus D. Implementing machine learning in health care-addressing ethical challenges. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(11):981–3. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1714229. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [83] Vayena E, Blasimme A, Cohen IG. Machine learning in medicine: addressing ethical challenges. PLoS Med. 2018;15(11):e1002689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002689. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDistributed responsibility may result in a lack of individual responsibility, leading to a tendency for everyone to be conservative and making the application and innovation of new technologies impossible.
“However, this distributed responsibility may result in a lack of individual responsibility, leading to a tendency for everyone to be conservative and making the application and innovation of new technologies impossible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAlgorithms may be continually updated beyond their initially approved clinical function, which may require particular policies and supervision.
“algorithms may be continually updated beyond their initially approved clinical function, which may require particular policies and supervision.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome believe that patients have an obligation to contribute to improving the quality of the health care system.
“Regarding the sharing of health care data, some believe that patients have an obligation to contribute to improving the quality of the health care system [90].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] Faden RR, Kass NE, Goodman SN, et al. An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. Hastings Cent Rep. 2013;43:16–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.134. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIf the doctor has errors in operation, the doctor and the medical institution are responsible.
“If the doctor has errors in operation, the doctor and the medical institution are responsible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationEducating users and patients about medical AI is a way to ensure that they understand the benefits, risks, and limitations of medical AI devices and increase product transparency and user trust.
“Educating users and patients about medical AI is also a way to ensure that they understand the benefits, risks, and limitations of medical AI devices and increase product transparency and user trust [98].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [98] FDA. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Software as a Medical Device. 2021. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-software-medical-device. Accessed 29 Jul 2022.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenCurrent medical AI falls under the category of medical devices.
“Besides, current medical AI falls under the category of medical devices”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationGDPR requires algorithms to have interpretability, and data subjects can take intervention and require interpretation of the relevant data when they are not satisfied with automated decisions.
“GDPR requires algorithms to have interpretability, and data subjects can take intervention and require interpretation of the relevant data when they are not satisfied with automated decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites GDPR
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIf a doctor causes damage, the medical institution can recover compensation from the doctor after taking responsibility.
“If a doctor causes damage, the medical institution can recover compensation from the doctor after taking responsibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlgorithmic transparency and traceability do not require algorithms to be explainable, but they provide the possibility of algorithmic explanation and form effective supervision.
“algorithmic transparency and traceability do not require algorithms to be explainable, but they provide the possibility of algorithmic explanation and form effective supervision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAI robot participation in diagnosis and treatment is predicated on the approval of the medical institution where it is located.
“AI robot’s participation in diagnosis and treatment is predicated on the approval of the medical institution where it is located.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationLegal experts concerned with AI governance criticize ethical principles as flawed and inadequate in addressing AI's ethical and social issues.
“Legal experts concerned with AI governance issues criticize ethical principles as flawed and inadequate in addressing AI’s ethical and social issues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] Calo R. Artificial intelligence policy: a primer and roadmap. UC Davis Law Rev. 2017;2:399–436. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3015350. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningData and algorithms are the basis of AI computing and decision-making.
“Therefore, data and algorithms are the basis of AI computing and decision-making.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
When accidents occur with medical AI, the responsibility attribution is not clear.
“When accidents occur with medical AI, the responsibility attribution is not clear”
The paper relies on this without support.
What is optimal for one patient in the same clinical situation may not be optimal for other patients.
“What is optimal for one patient in the same clinical situation may not be so for other patients.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The purpose of AI development is to serve humans better, not to subject humans to AI.
“We believe that the purpose of AI development is to serve humans better, not to subject humans to AI.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Technology should serve humans, not replace human talent and creativity.
“Technology should serve humans, not replace human talent and creativity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
At present, there is no unified standardized quality standard, access system, evaluation system and guarantee system for the application of AI in the medical field, and the related policy and regulation system has not been completely established.
“At present, there is no unified standardized quality standard, access system, evaluation system and guarantee system for the application of AI in the medical field, and the related policy and regulation system has not been completely established yet.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The utilization rate of big data in healthcare is low.
“The utilization rate of big data in healthcare is low.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most hospital data are unstructured and cannot bring out the value of 'big data'.
“Although the data in hospitals are enormous, most of them are unstructured data, which cannot bring out the value of “big data”.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many hospitals have not yet established a unified data management system, which is not conducive to unified analysis of data and impacts the application of AI technology in the medical field.
“Many hospitals have not yet established a unified data management system, which is not conducive to the unified analysis of data and impacts the application of AI technology in the medical field.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most scholars believe that AI robots at this stage can only belong to the category of tools.
“Most scholars believe that AI robots at this stage can only belong to the category of tools yet.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is the current consensus in the AI industry that AI cannot be a responsible subject.
“It is also the current consensus in the AI industry.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is limited transparency in the black box of algorithms, whose inherent logic is hidden even from developers.
“there is limited transparency in the black box of algorithms, whose inherent logic is hidden even from developers”
The paper relies on this without support.
Clinicians are not always able to explain their inferences perfectly, as they may make decisions based more on experience and intuition than on clear medical criteria.
“clinicians are also not always able to explain their inferences perfectly, as they may make decisions based more on experience and intuition than on clear medical criteria.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Medical AI will belong to the category of medical devices for a considerable period of time, and its main function is to assist doctors in diagnosis and treatment.
“medical AI will belong to the category of medical devices for a considerable period of time, and its main function is to assist doctors in diagnosis and treatment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Countries generally require or encourage medical device applicants to submit appropriate scientific research evidence to explain the scientific process and verify the safety and efficacy of the device at all stages of registration.
“Countries generally require or encourage medical device applicants to submit appropriate scientific research evidence to explain the scientific process and verify the safety and efficacy of the device at all stages of registration-including premarket approval and postmarketing studies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
International cooperation faces many obstacles, such as cultural and legal systems differences in each country, which may lead to different attitudes and positions in the face of medical AI.
“international cooperation also faces many obstacles, such as cultural and legal systems differences in each country, which may lead to different attitudes and positions in the face of medical AI.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the past, scientific and technological work was often the result of scientists setting up projects, the relevant departments or enterprises giving money, the government approving them, the public unaccountably affected, and humanities and social science experts cleaning up the mess.
“In the past, scientific and technological work was often the result of scientists setting up projects, the relevant departments or enterprises giving money, the government approving them, the public unaccountably affected, and humanities and social science experts cleaning up the mess.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The adoption of AI in nursing raises critical ethical, social, and educational concerns.
“Despite these promising developments, the adoption of AI in nursing raises critical ethical, social, and educational concerns.”
From The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
The Background and Discussion describe ethical and social risks of medical AI, and the Discussion’s ‘Multi-participation and international cooperation’ section calls for training and education. The paper addresses healthcare broadly and specifies doctors’ AI literacy; it does not establish these concerns specifically for AI adoption in nursing. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEthical challenges such as data privacy breaches, algorithmic bias, and a lack of transparency in AI decision-making threaten to undermine patient trust and exacerbate health disparities.
“Ethical challenges such as data privacy breaches, algorithmic bias, and a lack of transparency in AI decision-making processes threaten to undermine patient trust and exacerbate health disparities [7,8].”
From The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
Other practical frameworks exist with strategies to implement ethics and the governance of AI systems in health to separate the factors affecting trustworthy medical AI into design (data and algorithm aspects) and application, through controls strategies at both design and application phases.
“Other practical frameworks exist. They count with strategies to implement ethics and the governance of AI systems in health to separate the factors affecting trustworthy medical AI into design (data and algorithm aspects) and application. This is done through controls strategies [136] at both design and application phases.”
From Connecting the dots in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible AI systems and regulation (2023) · cites this paper as [136]
AI lacks the legal status of a human being, leaving humans as the ultimate duty bearers.
“From a legal perspective, AI lacks the legal status of a human being, leaving humans as the ultimate duty bearers [27].”
From Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care (2023) · cites this paper as [27]
Concerns regarding data privacy and security of patient information complicate research processes and hinder the integration of AI into clinical practice.
“In addition, concerns regarding the data privacy and security of patient information complicate research processes and hinder the integration of AI into clinical practice [50].”
From Artificial intelligence in assessment and intervention of speech and language disorders: A literature review (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Recalled surgical robot is identified by two different model names
MinorThe text identifies the recalled device as the ROSA Brain 3.0, but the cited FDA reference identifies it as the ROSA One 3.1 Brain Application.
“In 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration(FDA) urgently recalled Zimmer Biomet’s ROSA Brain 3.0 robotic surgical system due to errors in software that caused the robot's arm to be in the wrong position [51]”
“51. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Zimmer Biomet Recalls ROSA One 3.1 Brain Application Due to Error in Software.2021.”
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Not all algorithms are black boxes [33].”
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Deep learning is widely used in medical AI and performs very well currently in medical imaging analysis [36] and clinical risk prediction [37] significantly improving doctors’ diagnostic and predictive capabilities.”
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
(2012) · Thieves of Virtue · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9079.003.0009 · Cited by 13,453 · see citing works
Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge
Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A., Hubert, T., Baker, L., Lai, M., Bolton, A., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24270 · Cited by 9,084 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, AlphaGo Zero uses a deep learning algorithm that does not require human input of large amounts of game data for training like AlphaGo, but starts with a blank board and plays millions of games against itself to reach a level that is much higher than AlphaGo [35].”
BackgroundDissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax2342 · Cited by 7,137 · see citing works
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2870052 · Cited by 6,294 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The technical community has proposed the goal of explainable AI (XAI) [42] that is, making AI explainable while maintaining high performance.”
BackgroundHow the machine “thinks”: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms
Burrell, J. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951715622512 · Cited by 3,196 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There are three possible reasons for opacity: (1) algorithms are trade secrets that companies intentionally hide; (2) the inability of lay people to understand programming and algorithmic techniques; (3) the complex nature of the algorithms themselves, which are incom-prehensible to humans [32].”
BackgroundKey challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence
Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G., & King, D. (2019) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2 · Cited by 3,136 · see citing works
Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease
De Fauw, J., Ledsam, J. R., Romera-Paredes, B., Nikolov, S., Tomasev, N., Blackwell, S., Askham, H., Glorot, X., O’Donoghue, B., Visentin, D., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0107-6 · Cited by 2,639 · see citing works
Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine
Ching, T., Himmelstein, D. S., Beaulieu-Jones, B. K., Kalinin, A. A., Do, B. T., Way, G. P., Ferrero, E., Agapow, P.-M., Zietz, M., Hoffman, M. M., et al. (2018) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2017.0387 · Cited by 2,310 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, most of the current medical AI does not replace human doctors but rather speeds up and helps humans to diagnose [8] with the final decision still coming from humans [9] which is also known as “Augmented Intelligence” [10].”
BackgroundImplementing Machine Learning in Health Care — Addressing Ethical Challenges
Char, D. S., Shah, N. H., & Magnus, D. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1714229 · Cited by 1,857 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Algorithmic bias There are some who believe that it may be possible for AI to mitigate existing biases in the healthcare system, such as reducing human errors [22] and the cognitive biases of physicians in determining treatment decisions, leading to more equitable outcomes [23].”
BackgroundAttia, Z. I., Kapa, S., Lopez-Jimenez, F., McKie, P. M., Ladewig, D. J., Satam, G., Pellikka, P. A., Enriquez-Sarano, M., Noseworthy, P. A., Munger, T. M., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0240-2 · Cited by 1,389 · see citing works
The mechanism of action of aspirin
Vane, J. R., & Botting, R. M. (2003) · Thrombosis Research · doi:10.1016/s0049-3848(03)00379-7 · Cited by 1,225 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, aspirin was used for about 70 years for its antipyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory clinical effects, but its pharmacological mechanisms were not understood until later [93, 94].”
BackgroundAdversarial attacks on medical machine learning
Finlayson, S. G., Bowers, J. D., Ito, J., Zittrain, J. L., Beam, A. L., & Kohane, I. S. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw4399 · Cited by 1,088 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Whereas the image with superimposed noise was difficult for the human eye to distinguish compared to the original image, the benign diagnosis was incorrectly identified as malignant when the original image was rotated adversarially [57].”
BackgroundA governance model for the application of AI in health care
Reddy, S., Allan, S., Coghlan, S., & Cooper, P. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocz192 · Cited by 979 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It enables AI systems to generate universal ethical principles from specific ethical situations through machine learning and self-organization [78].”
BackgroundArtificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety
Challen, R., Denny, J., Pitt, M., Gompels, L., Edwards, T., & Tsaneva-Atanasova, K. (2019) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008370 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
Machine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges
Vayena, E., Blasimme, A., & Cohen, I. G. (2018) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002689 · Cited by 912 · see citing works
Introduction to artificial intelligence in medicine
Mintz, Y., & Brodie, R. (2019) · Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies · doi:10.1080/13645706.2019.1575882 · Cited by 818 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, most of the current medical AI does not replace human doctors but rather speeds up and helps humans to diagnose [8] with the final decision still coming from humans [9] which is also known as “Augmented Intelligence” [10].”
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence and Black‐Box Medical Decisions: <i>Accuracy versus Explainability</i>
London, A. J. (2019) · Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.973 · Cited by 801 · see citing works
Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics
Manson, N. C., & O'Neill, O. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814600 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges
Cath, C. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0080 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Muehlematter, U. J., Daniore, P., & Vokinger, K. N. (2021) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30292-2 · Cited by 665 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a total of 222 AI medical device products, and Europe has approved a total of 240 AI medical device products with European conformity certification [97].”
BackgroundMachine Learning and Health Care Disparities in Dermatology
Adamson, A. S., & Smith, A. (2018) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2348 · Cited by 639 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, an AI for melanoma diagnosis is difficult to apply to darker races because there are few medical images of darker races in the skin lesion database [29].”
BackgroundWhat do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?
Holzinger, A., Biemann, C., Pattichis, C. S., & Kell, D. B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.09923 · Cited by 636 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, there is a consensus among computer scientists that an inherent tension is between the performance and explainability of machine learning, with the best-performing algorithms being the least transparent and those that provide precise explanatory algorithms often being less accurate [46] which seems to be a lo…”
BackgroundSPARROW, R. (2007) · Journal of Applied Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00346.x · Cited by 593 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Some scholars argue that although AI may surpass humans in many aspects, they do not possess free will essentially and does not have moral sub-jectivity [63, 64].”
Potential liability for physicians using artificial intelligence
Price, W. N., Gerke, S., & Cohen, I. G. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.15064 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
The Social Control of Technology
Mayne, A. J. (1982) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2634327 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Predicting Risk of Suicide Attempts Over Time Through Machine Learning
Walsh, C. G., Ribeiro, J. D., & Franklin, J. C. (2017) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702617691560 · Cited by 571 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Deep learning is widely used in medical AI and performs very well currently in medical imaging analysis [36] and clinical risk prediction [37] significantly improving doctors’ diagnostic and predictive capabilities.”
On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare
Grote, T., & Berens, P. (2020) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105586 · Cited by 551 · cited 1× · see citing works
“People cannot explain how the machine makes judgments [38].”
BackgroundTranslating Principles into Practices of Digital Ethics: Five Risks of Being Unethical
Floridi, L. (2019) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00354-x · Cited by 524 · cited 1× · see citing works
“AI companies try to convince people that their behaviors, products, and services are ethical by “Ethics Bluewashing”, but it is not the case [15].”
BackgroundFaden, R. R., Kass, N. E., Goodman, S. N., Pronovost, P., Tunis, S., & Beauchamp, T. L. (2013) · Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.134 · Cited by 498 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Regarding the sharing of health care data, some believe that patients have an obligation to contribute to improving the quality of the health care system [90].”
BackgroundSemi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Data
Papernot, N., Abadi, M., Erlingsson, Ú., Goodfellow, I., & Talwar, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.05755 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Coeckelbergh, M. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00146-8 · Cited by 475 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Therefore, AI cannot be a responsible subject [65].”
BackgroundArtificial intelligence powers digital medicine
Fogel, A. L., & Kvedar, J. C. (2018) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-017-0012-2 · Cited by 461 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the future, medical AI may fundamentally change the medical model and decision-making mode [11, 12] and even replace humans or surpass them.”
BackgroundClinical applications of machine learning algorithms: beyond the black box
Watson, D. S., Krutzinna, J., Bruce, I. N., Griffiths, C. E., McInnes, I. B., Barnes, M. R., & Floridi, L. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l886 · Cited by 450 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…to machine learning to deep learning, medical AI is currently used in various medical fields such as medical image analysis, disease screening and prediction, clinical decision support, surgical robotics, health management, virtual medical assistants, and aiding in screening drug targets [2–5].”
MethodAdverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Data
Alemzadeh, H., Raman, J., Leveson, N., Kalbarczyk, Z., & Iyer, R. K. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151470 · Cited by 441 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Between 2000 and 2013, surgical robots in the United States were responsible for at least 1,391 harm-causing incidents and 144 deaths [48].”
BackgroundO'Sullivan, S., Nevejans, N., Allen, C., Blyth, A., Leonard, S., Pagallo, U., Holzinger, K., Holzinger, A., Sajid, M. I., & Ashrafian, H. (2019) · The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery · doi:10.1002/rcs.1968 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Sharon, T. (2017) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-016-0215-5 · Cited by 428 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Bias is often encoded and expressed through machine learning, which can have far-reaching effects on the outcomes [24].”
BackgroundThe Ugly Truth About Ourselves and Our Robot Creations: The Problem of Bias and Social Inequity
Howard, A., & Borenstein, J. (2018) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9975-2 · Cited by 337 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Human-induced bias is intentionally or unintentionally written by the developers because individuals are always influenced by their own moral perceptions and relevant interests, which affects data training [25, 26].”
BackgroundBig Data in Public Health: Terminology, Machine Learning, and Privacy
Mooney, S. J., & Pejaver, V. (2018) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014208 · Cited by 325 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Data-induced bias refers to the bias when the training data is not representative or insufficient that affects the algorithm model [27, 28].”
BackgroundMedical ethics considerations on artificial intelligence
Keskinbora, K. H. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2019.03.001 · Cited by 287 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…to machine learning to deep learning, medical AI is currently used in various medical fields such as medical image analysis, disease screening and prediction, clinical decision support, surgical robotics, health management, virtual medical assistants, and aiding in screening drug targets [2–5].”
MethodComputer knows best? The need for value-flexibility in medical AI
McDougall, R. J. (2019) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105118 · Cited by 262 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Computers recommend treatments based on specific parameters that may not actually best reflect the values and preferences of a particular patient [60].”
BackgroundFloridi, L. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0112 · Cited by 227 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Floridi suggested that we can develop a mechanism that moves away from concerning the intentions and perceptions of each individual agent, but instead, allows these agents to act as a network that shares risk and responsibility [79].”
BackgroundFloridi, L. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3835211 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Ethics of using and sharing clinical imaging data for artificial intelligence: a proposed framework
Larson, D. B., Magnus, D. C., Lungren, M. P., Shah, N. H., & Langlotz, C. P. (2020) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2020192536 · Cited by 199 · cited 1× · see citing works
“From the perspective of human benefits, it is also unethical not to use existing clinical data to develop tools to benefit all humanity [91].”
BackgroundSHARKEY, A. J. C. (2014) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-014-9338-5 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence Policy: A Roadmap
Calo, R. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3015350 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Psycho-Informatics: Big Data shaping modern psychometrics
Markowetz, A., Błaszkiewicz, K., Montag, C., Switala, C., & Schlaepfer, T. E. (2014) · Medical Hypotheses · doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2013.11.030 · Cited by 185 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There are some who believe that it may be possible for AI to mitigate existing biases in the healthcare system, such as reducing human errors [22] and the cognitive biases of physicians in determining treatment decisions, leading to more equitable outcomes [23].”
BackgroundSafety of patient-facing digital symptom checkers
Fraser, H., Coiera, E. W., & Wong, D. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32819-8 · Cited by 182 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the future, medical AI may fundamentally change the medical model and decision-making mode [11, 12] and even replace humans or surpass them.”
BackgroundAn introduction and overview of machine learning in neurosurgical care
Senders, J. T., Zaki, M. M., Karhade, A. V., Chang, B., Gormley, W. B., Broekman, M. L., Smith, T. R., & Arnaout, O. (2018) · Acta Neurochirurgica · doi:10.1007/s00701-017-3385-8 · Cited by 178 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Data-induced bias refers to the bias when the training data is not representative or insufficient that affects the algorithm model [27, 28].”
BackgroundSimpson, T. W. (2012) · Pacific philosophical quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01438.x · Cited by 167 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As for trust, Simpson [16] believed that trust arises from the fact that we rely on the cooperative behavior of others, and sometimes, we rely not on other people, but on things.”
BackgroundMachine morality: bottom-up and top-down approaches for modelling human moral faculties
Wallach, W., Allen, C., & Smit, I. (2008) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-007-0099-0 · Cited by 152 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Three approaches were considered: a top-down approach, a bottom-up approach, and a hybrid approach [77].”
MethodUsing artificial intelligence methods to speed up drug discovery
Álvarez-Machancoses, Ó., & Fernández‐Martínez, J. L. (2019) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2019.1621284 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
The need for health AI ethics in medical school education
Katznelson, G., & Gerke, S. (2021) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-021-10040-3 · Cited by 125 · cited 2× · see citing works
“However, these medical chatbots may also harm patients if they are not continuously updated, checked, or regulated [7].”
BackgroundInfluentialPassing the Turing Test Does Not Mean the End of Humanity
Warwick, K., & Shah, H. (2016) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-015-9372-6 · Cited by 69 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The Turing test suggests that complex AI may have a certain level of consciousness [61].”
BackgroundUnblinking eyes: The ethics of automating surveillance
Macnish, K. (2012) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-012-9291-0 · Cited by 69 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Therefore, safety flaws in AI may endanger more patients than the possibility of a single misdiagnosis by a doctor because automated systems will replicate more errors [50].”
BackgroundPrice, W. (2017) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.36644/mlr.116.3.regulating · Cited by 64 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Some scholars suggest that disclosure of algorithm source code to relevant subjects be set as a legal obligation for companies to improve the post-marketing regulatory system of medical AI [96].”
BackgroundAutomated Decision-Making and Big Data: Concerns for People With Mental Illness
Monteith, S., & Glenn, T. (2016) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-016-0746-6 · Cited by 62 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Human-induced bias is intentionally or unintentionally written by the developers because individuals are always influenced by their own moral perceptions and relevant interests, which affects data training [25, 26].”
BackgroundEthical and legal issues of ingestible electronic sensors
Gerke, S., Minssen, T., Yu, H., & Cohen, I. G. (2019) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-019-0290-6 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Kaufman, D., Bollinger, J., Dvoskin, R., & Scott, J. (2012) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2012.45 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
AI, Machine Learning, and Ethics in Health Care
Johnson, S. L. J. (2019) · Journal of Legal Medicine · doi:10.1080/01947648.2019.1690604 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
How Much Can Potential Jurors Tell Us About Liability for Medical Artificial Intelligence?
Price, W. N., Gerke, S., & Cohen, I. G. (2020) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.120.257196 · Cited by 40 · cited 1× · see citing works
“When the standard of care for cancer patients changes, such as adjusting medication doses to be more beneficial for a specific patient, and the care robot does not keep the information up to date, this can do harm to the patient’s health [54].”
BackgroundVirani, A. H., & Longstaff, H. (2015) · Journal of Genetic Counseling · doi:10.1007/s10897-014-9781-9 · Cited by 28 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Some scholars proposed more lenient forms of informed consent, such as broad consent and blanket consent, to facilitate practical implementation [88, 89].”
BackgroundTowards a Grounded Dialog Model for Explainable Artificial IntelligencePreprint
Madumal, P., Miller, T., Vetere, F., & Sonenberg, L. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.08055 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
The Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence
Zittrain, J. L., Ito, J., Herrera, F., et al. (2018) · Ethics and Information Technology · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Keane, M. T., & Kenny, E. M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.08069 · Cited by 10 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Scientists have worked hard to open the black box of AI, proposing many paths and methods to crack the black box, such as the twin-systems approach [43] and the dialog model [44] and have achieved some results.”
BackgroundZimmer Biomet ROSA One Brain Application
(2021) · Biomedical Safety & Standards · doi:10.1097/01.bmsas.0000805472.36628.8e · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- AMA (American Medical Association). Report of the Council on Long Range Planning and Development. 2018. https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2018-11/a18-clrpd-reports.pdf. Accessed 23 Jul 2022.
- Wang H, Meng XF, Wang Q, et al. Strategy for management and quality control of datasets in artificial intelligence medical device. China Med Devices. 2018;33(12):1–5.
- Xu Y, Ma XM, Yue Q, et al. Ethics of lung cancer image data and artificial intelligence. Med Soc. 2021;34(5):100–104
- Price W, Nicholson II. Medical AI and contextual bias. Harv J Law Technol. 2019;33:65–116.
- Liu LL, He YM, Liu XD. A survey on patients perceptions and trust in artificial intelligence healthcare. Chin Med Eth. 2019;32(8):986–90. https://doi.org/10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2019.08.07. · DOI
- Feldman R, Aldana E, Stein K. Artificial intelligence in the health care space: how we can trust what we cannot know. Stanf Law Policy Rev. 2019;30:399–419.
- Kamensky S. Artificial intelligence and technology in health care: overview and possible legal implications. DePaul J Health Care Law. 2020;21(3):1–13.
- Gan SP. How can robots have rights. Eth Res. 2017;3:126–30. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9115.2017.03.025. · DOI
- Jessica SA. From Jeopardy to Jaundice: the medical liability implications of Dr. Watson and other artificial intelligence systems. La Law Rev. 2013;73:1049.
- Chung J, Zink A. Hey Watson, can i sue you for malpractice? Examining the liability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Asia Pac J Health Law Eth. 2018;11(2):51–80.
- Weaver JF, Zheng ZF. How to sue a robot: liability and AI. Law Econ. 2019;1:140–60.
- Zhang L, Chen P. Critique of the theory of robot “personality” and the legal regulation of artificial intelligent objects. Academia. 2018;12:53–75. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1698.2018.12.006. · DOI
- IEEE. Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems, First Edition. 2016. https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/. Accessed 2 Dec 2022.
- Macnish K, Gauttier S. A pre-occupation with possession: the (non-) ownership of personal data. Big data and democracy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2020. p. 42–56.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Coeckelbergh, M., López de Prado, M., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101896 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care
Wang, C., Liu, S., Yang, H., Guo, J., Wu, Y., & Liu, J. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/48009 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
“From a legal perspective, AI lacks the legal status of a human being, leaving humans as the ultimate duty bearers [27].”
Evaluation of artificial intelligence techniques in disease diagnosis and prediction
Nia, N. G., Kaplanoğlu, E., & Nasab, A. (2023) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-023-00049-5 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
“Additionally, patient privacy must be taken seriously when entering data into artificial intelligence systems [132].”
BackgroundEsmaeilzadeh, P. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102861 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
AI Governance: A Systematic Literature Review
Batool, A., Zowghi, D., & Bano, M. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00653-w · Cited by 314 · see citing works
“These risks can only be mitigated through international communication, which can be achieved if governments take responsibility by establishing an AI ethics committee after collecting multiple opinions [31].”
Ethical and legal considerations in healthcare AI: innovation and policy for safe and fair use
Pham, T. D. (2025) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.241873 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Machine learning in point-of-care testing: innovations, challenges, and opportunities
Han, G., Goncharov, A., Eryılmaz, M., Ye, S., Palanisamy, B., Ghosh, R., Lisi, F., Rogers, E., Guzmán, D., Yigci, D., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58527-6 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
“The “ black-box ” nature of many AI and ML models poses another signi fi cant challenge 188 .”
Ennab, M., & Mcheick, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2024.1444763 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Benefits and Risks of AI in Health Care: Narrative Review
Chustecki, M. (2024) · Interactive Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.2196/53616 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
“…instance, this review highlights the importance of human oversight and the complementarity of AI with clinician expertise, which aligns with Morley et al [68] and Zhang and Zhang [69] but also offers additional insights into practical implementation issues not fully covered in the previous reviews.”
Yelne, S., Chaudhary, M., Dod, K., Sayyad, A., & Sharma, R. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.49252 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
“These structures also play a crucial role in ensuring that AI systems align with the organization's mission and values while focusing on patient safety, data security, and ethical patient care [57].”
BackgroundFountzilas, E., Pearce, T. E., Baysal, M. A., Chakraborty, A., & Tsimberidou, A. M. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01471-y · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Tuygunov, N., Samaranayake, L. P., Khurshid, Z., Rewthamrongsris, P., Schwendicke, F., Osathanon, T., & Yahya, N. A. (2025) · International Dental Journal · doi:10.1016/j.identj.2025.02.006 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Shaping the future of AI in healthcare through ethics and governance
Bouderhem, R. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02894-w · Cited by 195 · see citing works
“AI regulation and governance are of paramount importance (Zhang and Zhang 2023).”
The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review
El Arab, R. A., Al Moosa, O. A., Abuadas, F. H., & Somerville, J. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/69881 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
“Ethical challenges such as data privacy breaches, algorithmic bias, and a lack of transparency in AI decision-making processes threaten to undermine patient trust and exacerbate health disparities [7,8].”
Artificial intelligence for personalized nanomedicine; from material selection to patient outcomes
Mazumdar, H., Khondakar, K. R., Das, S., Halder, A., & Kaushik, A. K. (2024) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/17425247.2024.2440618 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
“Personalized medicine using AI brings up several ethical issues, such as algorithmic bias, patient consent, and data privacy [199].”
Abdelwanis, M., Alarafati, H. K., Tammam, M. M. S., & Simsekler, M. C. E. (2024) · Journal of Safety Science and Resilience · doi:10.1016/j.jnlssr.2024.06.001 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Vaira, L. A., Lechien, J. R., Abbate, V., Allevi, F., Audino, G., Beltramini, G. A., Bergonzani, M., Bolzoni, A. R., Committeri, U., Crimi, S., et al. (2023) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1002/ohn.489 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Implementing AI in healthcare—the relevance of trust: a scoping review
Steerling, E., Siira, E., Nilsén, P., Svedberg, P., & Nygren, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2023.1211150 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Research on Artificial-Intelligence-Assisted Medicine: A Survey on Medical Artificial Intelligence
Gou, F., Liu, J., Xiao, C., & Wu, J. (2024) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics14141472 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Brancato, V., Esposito, G., Coppola, L., Cavaliere, C., Mirabelli, P., Scapicchio, C., Borgheresi, R., Neri, E., Salvatore, M., & Aiello, M. (2024) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-024-04891-8 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“However, the rapid development of AI technology is also accompanied by many ethical concerns and potential biases in AI algorithms when handling sensitive medical data, necessitating a careful balance between technological advancement and the ethical principles of patient privacy and fairness [15].”
BackgroundBayeSeg: Bayesian modeling for medical image segmentation with interpretable generalizability
Gao, S., Zhou, H., Gao, Y., & Zhuang, X. (2023) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.102889 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Chest X-ray Images for Lung Disease Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Comprehensive Survey
Al‐qaness, M. A. A., Zhu, J., AL-Alimi, D., Dahou, A., Alsamhi, S. H., Elaziz, M. A., & Ewees, A. A. (2024) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-024-10081-y · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Hatia, A., Doldo, T., Parrini, S., Chisci, E., Cipriani, L., Montagna, L., Laganà, G., Guenza, G., Agosta, E., Vinjolli, F., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13030735 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“One health information for misinterpretation understand the important aspects to assess confidential health data, including personal information and medical records entered by patients in the chat box [27].”
BackgroundZhui, L., Li, F., Wang, X., Fu, Q., & Wei, R. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/60083 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
“From a legal perspective, AI lacks the legal standing of a human being, thus leaving humans as the ultimate accountable parties [45].”
Dailah, H. G., Koriri, M. D., Sabei, A., Kriry, T., & Zakri, M. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12242555 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“The healthcare sector accounted for 15% of all global data breaches in 2017, the second-highest percentage at that time [135].”
Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine: a consensus of 22.
Cecconi, M., Greco, M., Shickel, B., Angus, D. C., Bailey, H., Bignami, E., Calandra, T., Celi, L. A., Einav, S., Elbers, P., et al. (2025) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-025-05532-2 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence for medicine: Progress, challenges, and perspectives
Huang, T., Xu, H., Wang, H., Huang, H., Xu, Y., Li, B., Hong, S., Feng, G., Kui, S., Liu, G., et al. (2023) · The Innovation Medicine · doi:10.59717/j.xinn-med.2023.100030 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Badawy, W., Zinhom, H., & Shaban, M. (2025) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.13059 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Romero-Oraá, R., Herrero-Tudela, M., López, M. I., Hornero, R., & García, M. (2024) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108160 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
A survey on deep learning for polyp segmentation: techniques, challenges and future trends
Mei, J., Zhou, T., Huang, K., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y. X., Wu, Y., & Fu, H. (2025) · Visual Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44267-024-00071-w · Cited by 74 · see citing works
“Five primary themes influencing the credibility of medical AI include data quality, algorithmic biases, opacity, security considerations, and accountability [124].”
AI Governance: A Systematic Literature ReviewPreprint
Batool, A., Zowghi, D., & Bano, M. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4784792/v1 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Eke, C. I., & Shuib, L. M. (2024) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-024-10868-x · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Human centred explainable AI decision-making in healthcare
van Leersum, C. M., & Maathuis, C. (2025) · Journal of Responsible Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jrt.2025.100108 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Data Management in Biobanking: Strategies, Challenges, and Future Directions
Alkhatib, R., & Gaede, K. I. (2024) · BioTech · doi:10.3390/biotech13030034 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“Exploring the ethical and social implications of biobanking is crucial for guiding future directions in this field, ensuring that practices align with ethical principles [106], respect participant rights, and address societal concerns.”
BackgroundCan deepseek and ChatGPT be used in the diagnosis of oral pathologies?
Kaygisiz, Ö. F., & Teke, M. T. (2025) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-025-06034-x · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“From a legal perspective, AI does not have the legal status of a human being, leaving humans as the ultimate duty bearers [35].”
Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Surgery: Transforming Outcomes and Shaping the Future
Leivaditis, V., Beltsios, E. T., Papatriantafyllou, A., Grapatsas, K., Mulita, F., Kontodimopoulos, N., Baikoussis, N. G., Tchabashvili, L., Tasios, K., Maroulis, I., et al. (2025) · Clinics and Practice · doi:10.3390/clinpract15010017 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
AI-driven innovations in pharmaceuticals: optimizing drug discovery and industry operations
Saini, J. P. S., Thakur, A., & Yadav, D. (2025) · RSC Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1039/d4pm00323c · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Meylani, R. (2024) · Journal of Computer and Education Research · doi:10.18009/jcer.1477709 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Foundation models and intelligent decision-making: Progress, challenges, and perspectives
Huang, J., Xu, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, Q., Liang, X., Wang, F., Zhang, Z., Wei, W., Zhang, B., Huang, L., et al. (2025) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2025.100948 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationFrom Machine Learning to Patient Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review of AI in Pancreatic Cancer
Tripathi, S., Tabari, A., Mansur, A., Dabbara, H., Bridge, C. P., & Daye, D. (2024) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics14020174 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“Ensuring robust data protection mechanisms is imperative to prevent unauthorized access and potential misuse of personal health information [173–175].”
BackgroundAbas Mohamed, Y., Ee Khoo, B., Shahrimie Mohd Asaari, M., Ezane Aziz, M., & Rahiman Ghazali, F. (2025) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105689 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Olawade, D. B., Plabon, S. B., Ojo, A., Ogunbona, M. A., Makanjuola, B. D., & Olasilola, R. (2026) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106362 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence Applications in Smart Healthcare: A Survey
Gao, X., He, P., Zhou, Y. X., & Qin, X. (2024) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi16090308 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“Developing comprehensive accountability guidelines can help in establishing who should be held responsible for errors or system failures, and mechanisms should be put in place to address such issues effectively [138].”
Using artificial intelligence to improve primary care for patients and clinicians.
Sarkar, U., & Bates, D. W. (2024) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7965 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Hsieh, P.-J. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107868 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
The Application of Radiomics and AI to Molecular Imaging for Prostate Cancer
Tapper, W., Carneiro, G., Mikropoulos, C., Thomas, S. A., Evans, P., & Boussios, S. (2024) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm14030287 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“For example, Zhang et al. [122] identified five subject areas which influence the trustworthiness of medical AI.”
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence in Malnutrition: A Systematic Literature Review
Janssen, S. M. W., Bouzembrak, Y., & Teki̇nerdoğan, B. (2024) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100264 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Marques, M., Almeida, A. M., & Pereira, H. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.69405 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“There is also a theoretical debate about whether highly advanced AI should be granted certain rights, raising deep ethical questions about AI's future role in society [37,38].”
BackgroundStrigari, L., Schwarz, J., Bradshaw, T., et al. (2025) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.124.268186 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“For any medical AI to have a large-scale impact, it is crucial to incorporate source data from different geographic zones to support global health research, personalized medicine, and epidemiologic surveillance ( 14 , 15 ).”
Li, W., Ge, X., Liu, S., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2023.1336175 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Yaseen, I., & Rather, R. A. (2024) · International Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.2147/ijwh.s454127 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Gin, B. C., LaForge, K., Burk-Rafel, J., & Boscardin, C. K. (2025) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000006117 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Bečulić, H., Begagić, E., Skomorac, R., Mašović, A., Selimović, E., & Pojskić, M. (2023) · Medicinski Glasnik · doi:10.17392/1661-23 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Maccaro, A., Stokes, K., Statham, L., He, L., Williams, A., Pecchia, L., & Piaggio, D. (2024) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm14050443 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“This group explores the challenges and ethical considerations in safeguarding patient information in the context of AI-driven medical practices and health apps [43,44,46,47,53,60,61,68,71,84,90,102,105,113].”
BackgroundInfluentialThe unintended consequences of artificial intelligence in paediatric radiology
Ciet, P., Eade, C., Ho, M., Laborie, L. B., Mahomed, N., Naidoo, J., Pace, E., Segal, B., Toso, S., Tschauner, S., et al. (2023) · Pediatric Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00247-023-05746-y · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“This leads to questions of trustworthiness and whether some practitioners can ethically choose not to use AI [61, 62].”
Nti, I. K., Adekoya, A. F., Weyori, B. A., & Kyeremeh, F. (2023) · Decision Analytics Journal · doi:10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100292 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Gin, B. C., O’Sullivan, P., Hauer, K. E., Abdulnour, R.-E. E., Mackenzie, M. E., ten Cate, O., & Boscardin, C. (2024) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000005930 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Lu, H. J., Alhaskawi, A., Dong, Y., Zou, X., Zhou, H., Ezzi, S. H. A., Kota, V. G., Abdulla, M. H. A. H., & Abdalbary, S. A. (2024) · INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing · doi:10.1177/00469580241266364 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Okwor, I. A., Hitch, G., Hakkim, S., Akbar, S., Sookhoo, D., & Kainesie, J. (2024) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai5040095 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“However, the availability of Biobanks globally, initiated to capture and store large-scale biomedical, clinical, imaging, and genomic data, which provide a rich research resource, will go a long way in addressing some of these challenges [46].”
AI’s call: Jordan’s MSMEs answer with intent
Abaddi, S. (2024) · Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies · doi:10.1108/jeee-11-2023-0446 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Ethical and social issues related to AI in healthcare
Mondal, H., & Mondal, S. (2024) · Methods in microbiology · doi:10.1016/bs.mim.2024.05.009 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
How to mitigate the risks of deployment of artificial intelligence in medicine?
İlikhan, S. U., Özer, M., Tanberkan, H., & Bozkurt, V. (2024) · TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES · doi:10.55730/1300-0144.5814 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“All these factors affect people’s trust in medical AI [15].”
BackgroundInfluentialHow AI and Robotics Will Advance Interventional Radiology: Narrative Review and Future Perspectives
Zhang, J., Fang, J., Xu, Y., & Si, G. (2024) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics14131393 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“We need to find a balance between patient privacy, ethics, and AI company partners on data protection issues [121].”
BackgroundSelf-citationMachine Learning in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review
Adida, S., Legarreta, A. P., Hudson, J. S., McCarthy, D., Andrews, E., Shanahan, R. M., Taori, S., Lavadi, R. S., Buell, T. J., Hamilton, D. K., et al. (2023) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000002660 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Critical review of self‐diagnosis of mental health conditions using artificial intelligence
Wimbarti, S., Kairupan, B. H. R., & Tallei, T. E. (2024) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.13303 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Ethical Dilemmas of Using Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Astărăstoae, V., Rogozea, L. M., Leașu, F., & Ioan, B. (2024) · American Journal of Therapeutics · doi:10.1097/mjt.0000000000001693 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“55 The number of incidents produced by robots is quite high, and some have already been subject to processes related to effectiveness or malfunction; in the US, between 2000 and 2013, surgical robots were responsible for at least 1391 incidents that had adverse consequences for patients, including…”
The human role to guarantee an ethical AI in healthcare: a five-facts approach
Iniesta, R. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00353-x · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“…suggested that clinicians’ concerns about the AI use include the accuracy of advice given, potential legal liability if harm to a patient occurs [24, 46] and that medical practitioners fear that AI ‘may reduce their professional autonomy or may be used against them in the event of medical-legal…”
The Application of Large Language Models for Radiologic Decision Making
Zaki, H. A., Aoun, A., Munshi, S., Abdel-Megid, H., Nazario-Johnson, L., & Ahn, S. H. (2024) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2024.01.007 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Li, X., Zong, Q., & Cheng, M. (2024) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/2024/8885760 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“By fostering international collaboration, we can advance global cooperation in investigating and re-solving ethical concerns associated with medical AI and gain knowledge from one another [103, 104].”
Singh, M. P., & Keche, Y. N. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.84804 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Exploring AI Approaches for Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis: A Review Article
Ali, A., Alghamdi, M., Marzuki, S., Din, T. A. D. A. T., Yamin, M. S., Alrashidi, M., Alkhazi, I. S., & Ahmed, N. (2025) · Breast Cancer Targets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/bctt.s550307 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“21 This review synthesizes the recent advancements in AI and deep learning applications for breast cancer diagnosis, covering foundational models, data integration strategies, and the ethical landscape.”
Impact of artificial intelligence on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of endometrial cancer
Butt, S. R., Soulat, A., Lal, P. M., Fakhor, H., Patel, S. K., Ali, M. B., Arwani, S., Mohan, A., Majumder, K., Kumar, V., et al. (2024) · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1097/ms9.0000000000001733 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“It is also vital to foster international cooperation and communication and encourage various parties to debate and assess AI ’ s hazards and social implications [61] .”
BackgroundFeng, Q. J., Harte, M., Carey, B., Alqarni, A., Monteiro, L. S., Freitas, M. D., Fricain, J., Lodi, G., Brailo, V., Andreoletti, M., et al. (2024) · Oral Diseases · doi:10.1111/odi.15100 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“( Zhang & Zhang, 2023 ).”
InfluentialStogiannos, N., O’Regan, T., Scurr, E. D., Litosseliti, L., Pogose, M., Harvey, H., Kumar, A., Malik, R., Barnes, A., McEntee, M. F., et al. (2024) · Radiography · doi:10.1016/j.radi.2024.01.019 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Kumar, R., Singh, A. K., Kassar, A. S. A., Humaida, M. I., Joshi, S., & Sharma, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1558772 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Explainable AI for Cybersecurity
Sindiramutty, S. R., Tan, C. E., Lau, S. P., Thangaveloo, R., Gharib, A. H., Manchuri, A. R., Khan, N. A., Tee, W. J., & Muniandy, L. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6361-1.ch002 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Chau, M. T. (2024) · Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101733 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Krook, J., Winter, P., Downer, J., & Blockx, J. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00674-z · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Abuadas, M. H., & Albikawi, Z. F. (2025) · Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment · doi:10.1080/10911359.2025.2472852 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“As AI systems become more prevalent in medical decision-making, understanding the ethical implications of these technologies is crucial for ensuring responsible use in clinical practice (Pedersen et al., 2023; Zhang & Zhang, 2023).”
Artificial Intelligence in Wound Care Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review
Encarnação, R., Manuel, T., Palheira, H., Neves‐Amado, J., & Alves, P. J. P. (2024) · Nursing Reports · doi:10.3390/nursrep14010048 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“This approach enhances the educational experience while safeguarding the interests and rights of all involved stakeholders [43].”
BackgroundRaghavan, N., Patel, P. C., Limon, D., Morris, M. X., Kempenich, J. W., & Rajesh, A. (2025) · The American Surgeon · doi:10.1177/00031348251397597 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“51,52 Informed consent is critical, and residents and patients should know what data is collected, its storage duration, and how it is shared.”
Duggal, I., & Tripathi, T. (2024) · Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research · doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.04.003 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“26”
mplications of using artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of sepsis/sepsis shock
Gorecki, G.-P., Tomescu, D. R., Pleș, L., et al. (2024) · GERMS · doi:10.18683/germs.2024.1419 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Ethical framework for responsible foundational models in medical imaging
Jha, D., Durak, G., Das, A., Sanjotra, J., Susladkar, O., Sarkar, S., Rauniyar, A., Kumar Tomar, N., Peng, L., Li, S., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1544501 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Safety in medical AI systems requires a comprehensive validation protocol that includes rigorous testing, continuous monitoring, and regular assessment of outcomes [54].”
Self-citationDetecting and Mitigating the Clever Hans Effect in Medical Imaging: A Scoping Review
Vásquez-Venegas, C., Wu, C., Sundar, S., Prôa, R., Beloy, F. J., Medina, J. R., McNichol, M. C., Parvataneni, K., Kurtzman, N., Mirshawka, F., et al. (2024) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-024-01335-z · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Communication Sciences and Disorders: Introduction to the Forum
Green, J. R. (2024) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2024_jslhr-24-00594 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Nakao, Y., Nishihara, T., Sasaki, R., Fukushima, M., Miuma, S., Miyaaki, H., Akazawa, Y., & Nakao, K. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-57078-y · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Digital pathology implementation in cancer diagnostics: towards informed decision-making
Sulaieva, O., Dudin, O., Koshyk, O., Panko, M., & Kobyliak, N. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1358305 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Hammerschmidt, T., Hafner, A., Stolz, K., Passlack, N., Posegga, O., & Gerholz, K.-H. (2025) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-025-10596-0 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Upama, P. B., Kolli, A., Kolli, H., Alam, S., Syam, M., Shahriar, H., & Ahamed, S. I. (2023) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac57700.2023.00238 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Bridging the gap: From petri dish to patient - Advancements in translational drug discovery
El‐Tanani, M., Rabbani, S. A., El‐Tanani, Y., Matalka, I. I., & Khalil, I. A. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41317 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Transforming clinical reasoning—the role of AI in supporting human cognitive limitations
Greengrass, C. J. (2026) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1715440 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence Applications in Healthcare
Usmani, U. A., Happonen, A., Watada, J., & Khakurel, J. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-3091-3_89 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Ethical and legal issues regarding artificial intelligence (AI) and management of surgical data
Ferreres, A. R. (2024) · European Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108279 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Value-Based Health Care
Shah, R. F., Bozic, K. J., & Jayakumar, P. (2025) · HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · doi:10.1177/15563316251340074 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Bailo, P., Nittari, G., Pesel, G., Basello, E., Spasari, T., & Ricci, G. (2026) · Sci · doi:10.3390/sci8020036 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Alnaimat, F., Al-Halaseh, S., & AlSamhori, A. R. F. (2024) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e231 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“98 Legally speaking, since ChatGPT is not a person, 101 who can be held accountable?”
BackgroundHealth technology assessment framework for artificial intelligence-based technologies
Bidino, R. D., Daugbjerg, S. B., Papavero, S. C., Haraldsen, I., Cicchetti, A., & Sacchini, D. (2024) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462324000308 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Passlack, N., Hammerschmidt, T., & Posegga, O. (2024) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2431050 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Mitigating patient harm risks: A proposal of requirements for AI in healthcare
Garcia-Gomez, J. M., Blanes-Selva, V., Álvarez-Romero, C., Cenzano, J. C. D. B., Mesquita, F. P., Pazos, A., & Doñate-Martínez, A. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103168 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z.-M.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
- ORCID
- Zhang, Jie
- Venue
- BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Published
- 2023-01-13
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-7
- ISSN
- 1472-6947 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9840286
- OpenAlex
- W4315880904
- Semantic Scholar
- 9534e6b18c015575f7f49d5a1252c6a854a690d7
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 171 · 2025: 169 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 36
- FWCI
- 20.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Social Science Fund of China (18ZDA322)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in healthcare, trustworthy AI, AI ethics, AI governance, algorithmic bias, data quality, algorithmic opacity, algorithmic transparency, attribution of responsibility, health disparities, patient autonomy, AI regulation, ethical frameworks, legal status of AI, international cooperation
- MeSH terms
- Data Management, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Prognosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review