Cited by 302Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentDecolonial Thought and EpistemologiesSocial Sciences and Humanities

Food sovereignty as decolonization: some contributions from Indigenous movements to food system and development politics

Grey, Sam, Patel, Raj·2015·Agriculture and Human Values

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10460-014-9548-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grey, S., & Patel, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • Rhodes University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Grey, Sam
Venue
Agriculture and Human Values
Published
2014-10-05
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
431-444
ISSN
  • 0889-048X (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8366
OpenAlex
W1966057042
Cited by
302
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
29.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Agriculture and Human Values (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Victoria
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Sciences and Humanities
Keywords
food sovereignty, decolonization, indigenous movements, anti-colonial struggle, postcoloniality, indigenous politics, gender, food systems, politics of development, genetically modified crops, international trade agreements, North America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review