CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 137Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsIndigenous Peoples' Rights and Law

Tracing the terrain of Indigenous food sovereignties

Daigle, Michelle·2019·The Journal of Peasant Studies
DOI 10.1080/03066150.2017.1324423
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Food sovereignty scholars are increasingly re-conceptualizing sovereignty by accounting for its diverse expressions across space according to specific histories, identities, and local socio-ecological realities and dynamics. In grappling with the multiple bases of sovereignty, attention has been directed toward Indigenous food sovereignty in North America. Specifically, food scholars are examining how the regeneration of Indigenous food harvesting and sharing practices shapes movements for decolonization and self-determination. While this is a crucial and much-welcomed intervention, much more is needed to understand the diverse Indigenous political and legal orders and authorities that shape how multiple Indigenous food sovereignties are lived every day across diverse landscapes. In this contribution, I examine how Anishinaabe people in and beyond the Treaty 3 territory in Ontario, Canada, protect and renew their food harvesting grounds, waters and foodways through everyday acts of resurgence that are rooted in their law of mino bimaadiziwin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03066150.2017.1324423

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Corntassel J., 2012, Brown Journal of World Affairs, 18, 151
  2. Coté C., 2010, Spirits of our whaling ancestors: Revitalizing Makah & Nuu-chah-nulth traditions
  3. Schiavoni Christina M., 2016, The Journal of Peasant Studies 44, no. 1:, 1
  4. Simpson L., 2008, Lighting the eighth fire: The liberation, resurgence, and protection of indigenous nations, 73
  5. Simpson L., 2013, Dancing on our turtle’s back: Stories of Nishnaabeg re-creation, resurgence and a new emergence
  6. Simpson L., 2014, Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3, 1
  7. Wildcat M., 2014, Decolonization, Education & Society, 3, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Daigle, M.
Corresponding author
Daigle, Michelle
ORCID
Daigle, Michelle
Venue
The Journal of Peasant Studies
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2017-07-18
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
297-315
ISSN
  • 0306-6150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9361
DOI
10.1080/03066150.2017.1324423
OpenAlex
W2736374074
Semantic Scholar
9151d4fd59af0f84f913b6dc0a4801b057b65a7a
Cited by
137
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6
FWCI
16.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Peasant Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
Keywords
Indigenous food sovereignty, Anishinaabe, indigenous law, foodways, decolonization, resurgence, Indigenous self-determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review