Cited by 22HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskHIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology

“Manejar la Situacion”: Partner Notification, Partner Management, and Conceptual Frameworks for HIV/STI Control Among MSM in Peru

Open access
Clark, Jesse L., Perez-Brumer, Amaya, Salazar, Ximena·2015·AIDS and Behavior

Abstract

Previous analyses of partner notification (PN) have addressed individual, interpersonal, social, and structural issues influencing PN outcomes but have paid less attention to the conceptual framework of PN itself. We conducted 18 individual interviews and 8 group discussions, in a two-stage qualitative research process, to explore the meanings and contexts of PN for sexually transmitted infections (STI) among men who have sex with men (MSM) and men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) in Lima, Peru. Participants described PN as the open disclosure of private, potentially stigmatizing information that could strengthen or disrupt a partnership, structured by the tension between concealment and revelation. In addition to informing partners of an STI diagnosis, the act of PN was believed to reveal other potentially stigmatizing information related to sexual identity and practices such as homosexuality, promiscuity, and HIV co-infection. In this context, the potential development of visible, biological STI symptoms represented a risk for disruption of the boundary between secrecy and disclosure that could result in involuntary disclosure of STI status. To address the conflict between concealment and disclosure, participants cited efforts to "manejar la situacion" (manage the situation) by controlling the biological risks of STI exposure without openly disclosing STI status. We use this concept of "managing the situation" as a practical and theoretical framework for comprehensive Partner Management for HIV/STI control systems among MSM in Latin America.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10461-015-1049-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. [1]Klovdahl AS Potterat JJ Woodhouse DE Muth JB Muth SQ Darrow WW Social networks and infectious disease: the Colorado Springs Study Social science & medicine 1994 1 38 1 79 88 8146718
  2. [3]Potterat JJ Rothenberg RB Muth SQ Network structural dynamics and infectious disease propagation International journal of STD & AIDS 1999 3 10 3 182 5 Epub 1999/05/26. eng 10340199
  3. [4]Hawkes S Mabey D Mayaud P Partner notification for the control of sexually transmitted infections Bmj 2003 9 20 327 7416 633 4 14500409 PMC196382
  4. [5]Alam N Chamot E Vermund SH Streatfield K Kristensen S Partner notification for sexually transmitted infections in developing countries: a systematic review BMC public health 2010 10 19 20082718 PMC2821362
  5. [6]Low N Broutet N Adu-Sarkodie Y Barton P Hossain M Hawkes S Global control of sexually transmitted infections Lancet 2006 12 2 368 9551 2001 16 17141708
  6. [7]Clark JL Long CM Giron JM Cuadros JA Caceres CF Coates TJ Partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases in Peru: knowledge, attitudes, and practices in a high-risk community Sexually transmitted diseases 2007 5 34 5 309 13 17016236
  7. [8]Diaz-Olavarrieta C Garcia SG Feldman BS Polis AM Revollo R Tinajeros F Maternal syphilis and intimate partner violence in Bolivia: a gender-based analysis of implications for partner notification and universal screening Sexually transmitted diseases 2007 7 34 7 Suppl S42 6 17592389
  8. [9]Jones HE Lippman SA Pinho AA Luppi CG van de Wijgert JH Diaz J Partner-delivered medication for sexually transmitted infections: findings from Brazil Gaceta medica de Mexico 2006 Sep-Oct 142 Suppl 2 69 76 19031681
  9. [10]Sabido M Gregg LP Valles X Nikiforov M Monzon JE Pedroza MI Notification for sexually transmitted infections and HIV among sex workers in Guatemala: acceptability, barriers, and preferences Sexually transmitted diseases 2012 7 39 7 504 8 22706210
  10. [11]Thurman AR Shain RN Holden AE Champion JD Perdue ST Piper JM Partner notification of sexually transmitted infections: a large cohort of Mexican American and African American women Sexually transmitted diseases 2008 2 35 2 136 40 17898679
  11. [12]Malta M Bastos FI Strathdee SA Cunnigham SD Pilotto JH Kerrigan D Knowledge, perceived stigma, and care-seeking experiences for sexually transmitted infections: a qualitative study from the perspective of public clinic attendees in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil BMC public health 2007 7 18 17270044 PMC1797160
  12. [14]Clark JL Konda KA Silva-Santisteban A Peinado J Lama JR Kusunoki L Sampling Methodologies for Epidemiologic Surveillance of Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Women in Latin America: An Empiric Comparison of Convenience Sampling, Time Space Sampling, and Respondent Driven Sampling AIDS and behavior 2013 12 21 PMC4065637 24362754
  13. [15]Alam N Streatfield PK Khan SI Momtaz D Kristensen S Vermund SH Factors associated with partner referral among patients with sexually transmitted infections in Bangladesh Social science & medicine 2010 12 71 11 1921 6 20943297 PMC2991073
  14. [16]Mimiaga MJ Reisner SL Tetu AM Cranston K Bertrand T Novak DS Psychosocial and behavioral predictors of partner notification after HIV and STI exposure and infection among MSM AIDS and behavior 2009 8 13 4 738 45 18636324
  15. [17]Coleman C Lohan M Sexually acquired infections: do lay experiences of partner notification challenge practice? Journal of Advanced Nursing 2007 58 1 35 43 17394614
  16. [18]Fortenberry JD McFarlane M Bleakley A Bull S Fishbein M Grimley DM Relationships of stigma and shame to gonorrhea and HIV screening American journal of public health 2002 3 92 3 378 81 11867314 PMC1447083
  17. [19]Abraham T Macauda M Erickson P Singer M “And let me see them damn papers!” The role of STI/AIDS screening among urban African American and Puerto Rican youth in the transition to sex without a condom AIDS and behavior 2011 10 15 7 1359 71 20844945
  18. [20]Gorbach PM Holmes KK Transmission of STIs/HIV at the partnership level: beyond individual-level analyses Journal of urban health: bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 2003 12 80 4 Suppl 3 iii15 25 14713668 PMC3456259
  19. [21]Harrison A Lurie M Wilkinson N Exploring partner communication and patterns of sexual networking: qualitative research to improve management of sexually transmitted diseases Health transition review: the cultural, social, and behavioural determinants of health 1997 7 Suppl 3 103 7 10175971
  20. [22]Klisch SA Mamary E Diaz Olavarrieta C Garcia SG Patient-led partner notification for syphilis: Strategies used by women accessing antenatal care in urban Bolivia Social science & medicine 2007 9 65 6 1124 35 17561325
  21. [23]Lichtenstein B Schwebke JR Partner notification methods for African American men being treated for trichomoniasis: a consideration of main men, Second Hitters, and Third Players Medical anthropology quarterly 2005 12 19 4 383 401 16435646
  22. [24]Faxelid EA Ramstedt KM Partner notification in context: Swedish and Zambian experiences Social science & medicine 1997 4 44 8 1239 43 9131748
  23. [26]Gorbach PM Aral SO Celum C Stoner BP Whittington WL Galea J To notify or not to notify: STD patients’ perspectives of partner notification in Seattle Sexually transmitted diseases 2000 4 27 4 193 200 10782740
  24. [27]Gorbach PM Galea JT Amani B Shin A Celum C Kerndt P Don’t ask, don’t tell: patterns of HIV disclosure among HIV positive men who have sex with men with recent STI practising high risk behaviour in Los Angeles and Seattle Sexually transmitted infections 2004 12 80 6 512 7 15572626 PMC1744943
  25. [28]Mimiaga MJ Reisner SL Tetu AM Bonafide KE Cranston K Bertrand T Partner notification after STD and HIV exposures and infections: knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of Massachusetts men who have sex with men Public health reports 2009 Jan-Feb 124 1 111 9 19413033 PMC2602936
  26. [29]Hunter P Oyervides O Grande KM Prater D Vann V Reitl I Facebook-augmented partner notification in a cluster of syphilis cases in Milwaukee Public health reports 2014 Jan-Feb 129 Suppl 1 43 9 24385648 PMC3862987
  27. [30]Tuneu M Valles X Carnicer-Pont D Barbera M Godoy P Avecilla-Palau A Pilot study to introduce a notification card for partner notification of sexually transmitted infections in Catalonia, Spain, June 2010 to June 2011 Euro surveillance: bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin 2013 18 27 23870079
  28. [32]Golden MR Whittington WL Handsfield HH Hughes JP Stamm WE Hogben M Effect of expedited treatment of sex partners on recurrent or persistent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection The New England journal of medicine 2005 2 17 352 7 676 85 15716561
  29. [33]Kissinger P Schmidt N Mohammed H Leichliter JS Gift TL Meadors B Patient-delivered partner treatment for Trichomonas vaginalis infection: a randomized controlled trial Sexually transmitted diseases 2006 7 33 7 445 50 16531939
  30. [34]Schillinger JA Kissinger P Calvet H Whittington WL Ransom RL Sternberg MR Patient-delivered partner treatment with azithromycin to prevent repeated Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women: a randomized, controlled trial Sexually transmitted diseases 2003 1 30 1 49 56 12514443
  31. [35]Michaud JM Ellen J Johnson SM Rompalo A Responding to a community outbreak of syphilis by targeting sex partner meeting location: an example of a risk-space intervention Sexually transmitted diseases 2003 7 30 7 533 8 12838079
  32. [37]Gostin LO Hodge JG Piercing the veil of secrecy in HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases: theories of privacy and disclosure in partner notification Duke J Gender Law and Policy 1998 5 9 9 88 11979604
  33. [38]Ferreira A Young T Mathews C Zunza M Low N Strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted infections, including HIV The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013 10 CD002843 24092529 PMC7138045
  34. [39]Perez-Brumer AG Konda KA Salvatierra HJ Segura ER Hall ER Montano SM Prevalence of HIV, STIs, and risk behaviors in a cross-sectional community- and clinic-based sample of men who have sex with men (MSM) in Lima, Peru PloS one 2013 8 4 e59072 23634201 PMC3636243
  35. [40]Sanchez J Lama JR Kusunoki L Manrique H Goicochea P Lucchetti A HIV-1, sexually transmitted infections, and sexual behavior trends among men who have sex with men in Lima, Peru Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes 2007 4 15 44 5 578 85 17279049
  36. [41]Silverman D Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook 4 Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications 2010
  37. [42]Weber RP Basic Content Analysis Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications 1990
  38. [44]Petronio S Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure Albany, NY SUNY Press 2002
  39. [45]Parker R Aggleton P HIV and AIDS-related stigma and discrimination: a conceptual framework and implications for action Social science & medicine 2003 7 57 1 13 24 12753813
  40. [47]Lichtenstein B Stigma as a barrier to treatment of sexually transmitted infection in the American deep south: issues of race, gender and poverty Social science & medicine 2003 12 57 12 2435 45 14572849

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, J. L., Perez-Brumer, A., & Salazar, X.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE)
Corresponding author
Clark, Jesse L.
Venue
AIDS and Behavior
Published
2015-03-28
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
2245-2254
ISSN
  • 1090-7165 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3254
OpenAlex
W2087738327
Cited by
22
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIDS and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000124)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH084611, R21MH092232, P30MH058107, R25MH083620)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI028697)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD049339)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › HIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology
Keywords
partner notification, partner management, men who have sex with men, men who have sex with men and women, sexually transmitted infections, HIV, concealment and disclosure, sexual stigma, Peru, Lima, HIV coinfection
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Peru, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, HIV Infections, Contact Tracing, Homosexuality, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review