Cited by 17Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsReproductive tract infections research

Traditional and Web-Based Technologies to Improve Partner Notification Following Syphilis Diagnosis Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Lima, Peru: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Clark, Jesse L, Segura, Eddy R, Oldenburg, Catherine E, Salvatierra, Hector J, Rios, Jessica, Perez-Brumer, Amaya Gabriela, Gonzales, Pedro, Sheoran, Bhupendra +2 more·2018·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient-initiated partner notification (PN) following the diagnosis of a sexually transmitted infection is a critical component of disease control in men who have sex with men (MSM) sexual networks. Both printed and internet-based technologies offer potential tools to enhance traditional partner notification approaches among MSM in resource-limited settings. OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effect of 2 different PN technologies on notification outcomes following syphilis diagnosis among MSM in Peru: a Web-based notification system and patient-delivered partner referral cards. METHODS: During 2012-2014, we screened 1625 MSM from Lima, Peru, for syphilis infection and enrolled 370 MSM with symptomatic primary or secondary syphilis (n=58) or asymptomatic latent syphilis diagnosed by serology (rapid plasma reagin, RPR, and Microhemagglutination assay for Treponema pallidum antibody; n=312). Prior to enrollment, potential participants used a computer-based self-interviewing system to enumerate their recent sexual partnerships and provide details of their 3 most recent partners. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to one of 4 intervention arms: (1) counseling and patient-initiated Web-based PN (n=95), (2) counseling with Web-based partner notification and partner referral cards (n=84), (3) counseling and partner referral cards (n=97), and (4) simple partner notification counseling (control; n=94). Self-reported partner notification was assessed after 14 days among 354 participants who returned for the follow-up assessment. RESULTS: The median age of enrolled participants was 27 (interquartile range, IQR 23-34) years, with a median of 2 partners (IQR 1-5) reported in the past month. Compared with those who received only counseling (arm 4), MSM provided with access to Web-based partner notification (arms 1 and 2) or printed partner referral cards (arms 2 and 3) were more likely to have notified one or more of their sexual partners (odds ratio, OR, 2.18, 95% CI 1.30-3.66; P=.003 and OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.01-2.79; P=.045, respectively). The proportion of partners notified was also higher in both Web-based partner notification (241/421, 57.2%; P<.001) and referral card (240/467, 51.4%; P=.006) arms than in the control arm (82/232, 35.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Both new Web-based technologies and traditional printed materials support patient-directed notification and improve self-reported outcomes among MSM with syphilis. Additional research is needed to refine the use of these partner notification tools in specific partnership contexts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01720641; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01720641 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/70A89rJL4).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.9821

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expedited partner therapy probably reduced reinfection in patients and increased the number of partners treated compared with simple patient referral.

    “When compared with simple patient referral, EPT probably reduced reinfection in patients and increased the number of partners treated, with four of the five trials showing a moderate difference favouring EPT (90, 95, 103, 108), while a fifth trial indicated no difference between groups, although the evidence was of low certainty (99).”

    From Updated recommendations for the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Treponema pallidum (syphilis) and new recommendations on syphilis testing and partner services (2024) · cites this paper as [103]

    The Methods and Results describe a trial of web-based notification and referral cards versus counseling, not expedited partner therapy (EPT). The Results mention a separate EPT trial but report no EPT comparison for patient reinfection or the number of partners treated. Searches for EPT, reinfection, and partner treatment found no passage establishing the claimed effects. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Parran, Thomas, 1937, Shadow on the Land: Syphilis
  2. Rietmeijer, C, 2013, Sex Transm Infect, 89, A12
  3. van, RM, 2013, Sex Transm Infect, 89, A335
  4. 2004, Guias Nacionales de Atencion Integral de Salud Sexual y Reproductiva, -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, J. L., Segura, E. R., Oldenburg, C. E., Salvatierra, H. J., Rios, J., Perez-Brumer, A. G., Gonzales, P., Sheoran, B., Sanchez, J., & Lama, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Peruvian University of Applied Sciences (PE)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Asociación Civil Impacta Salud y Educación (PE)
  • Youth+Tech+Health (US)
Corresponding author
Clark, Jesse L
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2018-07-03
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
e232
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2811362827
Cited by
16
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH084611, P30MH058107, R25MH087222, R25MH083620)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32DA013911)
  • Fogarty International Center (R25TW009343, D43TW009343)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD049339)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
partner notification, syphilis, men who have sex with men, sexually transmitted infections, latent syphilis, primary and secondary syphilis, sexual networks, Lima, resource-limited settings, HIV prevention, harm reduction, RPR
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adult, Humans, Male, Peru, Pilot Projects, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Syphilis, Contact Tracing, Homosexuality, Male, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review