CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 298Resilience and Mental HealthRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCommunity Health and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Counterspaces: A Unit of Analysis for Understanding the Role of Settings in Marginalized Individuals’ Adaptive Responses to Oppression

Case, Andrew D., Hunter, Carla D.·2012·American Journal of Community Psychology
DOI 10.1007/s10464-012-9497-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Research and theory on the intervening variables that enable individuals who experience marginalization and oppression to achieve well‐being have historically relied on an individual level of analysis. Yet, there is a growing body of literature that highlights the roles that contexts play in facilitating processes that result in wellness among marginalized individuals. This paper proposes a conceptual framework that highlights a specific type of setting, referred to as “counterspaces,” which promotes the psychological well‐being of individuals who experience oppression. Counterspaces are theorized to enhance well‐being by challenging deficit‐oriented societal narratives concerning marginalized individuals’ identities. The conceptual frame proposed here suggests that “challenging” can occur through at least three processes: (1) narrative identity work, (2) acts of resistance, and (3) direct relational transactions. This paper articulates each of these challenging processes. Additionally, the utility of using the Counterspaces framework for thinking critically about and investigating how settings—and the transactional processes that unfold within them—are associated with the promotion of psychological wellness for various marginalized populations is discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10464-012-9497-7

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Henry J, 2008, Under the mas: Resistance and rebellion in Trinidad masquerade
  2. Jocson KM, 2006, Resistance! Youth activism and community change: New democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America's youth
  3. Salem D, 2011, Empowering settings and voices for social change, 107
  4. Stewart JE, 2011, Empowering settings and voices for social change, 38

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 298

Related

Metadata

Authors
Case, A. D., & Hunter, C. D.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Case, Andrew D.
ORCID
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-29
Volume
50
Issue
1-2
Pages
257-270
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
DOI
10.1007/s10464-012-9497-7
OpenAlex
W1980398825
Cited by
298
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
Keywords
counter-spaces, marginalized individuals, oppression, psychological well-being, contextual factors, deficit narratives, conceptual framework
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Coercion, Female, Humans, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Self Concept, Social Marginalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review