Cited by 121Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchMemory, History, Trauma, IdentityCounseling Practices and Supervision

Community Healing and Resistance Through Storytelling: A Framework to Address Racial Trauma in Africana Communities

Open access
Chioneso, Nkechinyelum A., Hunter, Carla D., Gobin, Robyn L., McNeil Smith, Shardé, Mendenhall, Ruby, Neville, Helen A.·2020·Journal of Black Psychology

Abstract

Racial trauma, an ongoing consequence of historical trauma, has deleterious effects on the well-being of Africana communities. The psychological literature primarily reflects individual processes in the relationship between racial trauma and healing. Going beyond individualistic approaches, we present a community healing framework informed by multidisciplinary scholarship: Community Healing and Resistance Through Storytelling ( C-HeARTS). Three major components of the framework are delineated: (a) justice as both a condition of and an outcome of community healing; (b) culturally syntonic processes (i.e., storytelling and resistance) that direct the renarrating of trauma and act as conduits for transformation; and (c) psychological dimensions (i.e., connectedness, collective memory, and critical consciousness) that promote justice-informed outcomes. In the C-HeARTS framework, community is advanced as an agent of change while centering justice and the important role of cultural practices to facilitate community healing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0095798420929468

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Theoretical and empirical studies developed to culturally address racial trauma have a common set of elements.

    “Theoretical and empirical studies developed to culturally address racial trauma have a common set of elements (Chioneso et al., 2020; Comas-Díaz, 2016; Metzger et al., 2021).”

    From Complex Racial Trauma: Evidence, Theory, Assessment, and Treatment (2023) · cites this paper as Chioneso et al., 2020

  • Few studies have been devoted to treatments that can adequately address race-based trauma.

    “Although the scientific literature has become more focused on race-based trauma, few studies have been devoted to treatments that can adequately address these issues (Chioneso et al., 2020; Metzger et al., 2021).”

    From Complex Racial Trauma: Evidence, Theory, Assessment, and Treatment (2023) · cites this paper as Chioneso et al., 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chioneso, N. A., Hunter, C. D., Gobin, R. L., McNeil Smith, S., Mendenhall, R., & Neville, H. A.
Affiliations
  • Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
Corresponding author
Chioneso, Nkechinyelum A.
Venue
Journal of Black Psychology
Published
2020-03
Volume
46
Issue
2-3
Pages
95-121
ISSN
  • 0095-7984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4558
OpenAlex
W3033711019
Cited by
121
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10
FWCI
17.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Black Psychology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
racial trauma, community healing, storytelling, resistance, historical trauma, justice, collective memory, critical consciousness, connectedness, cultural practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review