A Critical Review of the “Undoing Hypothesis”: Do Positive Emotions Undo the Effects of Stress?
Abstract
Research in affective science has shown that trait positive affect reduces the risk of developing disease and is protective against the progression of certain diseases. Research also suggests that trait positive affect predisposes individuals to more frequent experiences of positive emotional states. The undoing effect has been proposed as a potential mechanism explaining how positive emotions influence health outcomes. According to this hypothesis, the experience of state positive emotions or positive affect contributes to faster recovery from the body's physiological response to stress. This paper critically reviews literature concerning the undoing hypothesis. Several common methodological weaknesses were identified, including conceptual and design issues. Based on the reviewed studies two separate conclusions were drawn. First, there was insufficient evidence to conclude that the occurrence of positive emotional states speeds physiological recovery. Second, there was insufficient evidence to evaluate the undoing hypothesis as a potential mechanism through which state positive emotions affect health. Future research should focus on identifying the key parameters responsible for demonstrating the undoing effect when it is observed in order to understand how the experience of positive emotions may exert positive effects on health outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Positive psychological factors can promote healthier cardiovascular function via either health-promoting effects on biological processes such as inflammation or buffering effects whereby reactivity to stressful experiences is mitigated or less potent, although study findings are not fully consistent.
“Positive psychological factors can promote healthier cardiovascular function via either health-promoting effects on biological processes such as inflammation or buffering effects whereby reactivity to stressful experiences is mitigated or less potent, although study findings are not fully consistent. 53,125”
From Psychological Health, Well-Being, and the Mind-Heart-Body Connection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2021) · cites this paper as [125]
Cites
Boehm, J. K., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0027448 · Cited by 909 · see citing works
Regulation of Positive Emotions: Emotion Regulation Strategies that Promote Resilience
Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2007) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9015-4 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Going to the heart of the matter
Kubzansky, L. D., & Kawachi, I. (2000) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(99)00091-4 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
I don’t want to come back down: Undoing versus maintaining of reward recovery in older adolescents
Gilbert, K. E., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Gruber, J. (2016) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000128 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Levine, G. N., Cohen, B. E., Commodore-Mensah, Y., Fleury, J., Huffman, J. C., Khalid, U., Labarthe, D. R., Lavretsky, H., Michos, E. D., Spatz, E. S., et al. (2021) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000947 · Cited by 865 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cavanagh, C. E., & Larkin, K. T.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- West Virginia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cavanagh, Casey E.
- Venue
- Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
- Published
- 2018-09-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 259-273
- ISSN
- 0363-3586 (ISSN-L)
- 1090-0586
- 1573-3270
- OpenAlex
- W2889754102
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 0.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Keywords
- positive emotions, stress recovery, physiological stress response, trait positive affect, health outcomes, methodological weaknesses
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Humans, Psychological Theory, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review