Cited by 791Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionResilience and Mental HealthOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Regulation of Positive Emotions: Emotion Regulation Strategies that Promote Resilience

Tugade, Michele M., Fredrickson, Barbara L.·2007·Journal of Happiness Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10902-006-9015-4

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L.
Affiliations
  • Vassar College (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Tugade, Michele M.
Venue
Journal of Happiness Studies
Published
2006-12-19
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
311-333
ISSN
  • 1389-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7780
OpenAlex
W2047153780
Cited by
791
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Happiness Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
positive emotion regulation, positive emotions, resilience, emotion regulation strategies, well-being, coping, stress, automatic activation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review