Cited by 8Cancer survivorship and careEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesMusic Therapy and Health

Cancer patients’ age-related benefits from mobile neurofeedback-therapy in quality of life and self-efficacy: a clinical waitlist control study

Open access
Schmidt, Kira, Krawutschke, Marvin, Kowalski, Axel, Pasche, Saskia, Bialek, Anna, Schweig, Theresa, Weismüller, Benjamin, Tewes, Mitra +7 more·2023·Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

Abstract

Abstract Electroencephalographic neurofeedback (EEG NF) can improve quality of life (QoL) and reduce distress by modifying the amplitude of selected brain frequencies. This study aims to investigate the effects of NF therapy on QoL and self-efficacy in cancer patients and to explore age-related reactions. In a waitlist control paradigm, psychometric data (EORTC QLQ-C30, General Self-Efficacy Scale) of 20 patients were collected at three different time points, each five weeks apart. An outpatient 10-session NF intervention (mobile) was conducted between the second and third measurement point. QoL and self-efficacy changed significantly over time (QoL: F(2,36) = 5.294, p < .05, η2 = .227; Self-efficacy: F(2,26) = 8.178, p < .05, η2 = .386). While QoL increased in younger patients, older patients initially showed a decrease in QoL, which then increased during intervention. Younger patients did not differ from older patients in QoL in both waitlist control (T0-T1) and intervention phase (T1–T2). QoL in older patients significantly differed between waitlist control and intervention phase (Z = − 2.023, p < .05, d = 1.085). Self-efficacy increased in both age categories. Younger and older patients did not differ in self-efficacy in waitlist control, but in intervention phase (F(1,16) = 7.014, p < .05, η2 = .319). The current findings suggest that NF therapy is a promising treatment modality for improving QoL in cancer patients. Our study reveals NF being a tool to influence self-efficacy, which should receive more appreciation in clinical care. However, the effect of NF in different age groups as well as the influence on further cancer-related symptoms should be investigated in future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10484-022-09571-1

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, K., Krawutschke, M., Kowalski, A., Pasche, S., Bialek, A., Schweig, T., Weismüller, B., Tewes, M., Schuler, M., Hamacher, R., Müller, B. W., Schadendorf, D., Skoda, E.-M., Teufel, M., & Fink, M.
Affiliations
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • University of Wuppertal (DE)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, Kira
Venue
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
Published
2022-11-18
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
217-227
ISSN
  • 0363-3586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1090-0586
  • 1573-3270
OpenAlex
W4309582461
Cited by
8
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Essen University Medicine Foundation
  • Wiedenfeld-Stiftung
  • Universitätsklinikum Essen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
Keywords
cancer patients, quality of life, self-efficacy, age differences, waitlist control, EORTC QLQ-C30, General Self-Efficacy Scale, cancer-related distress
MeSH terms
Aged, Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Neurofeedback

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review