Cited by 85Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceMental Health Treatment and Access

Barriers to Adoption of New Treatments: An Internet Study of Practicing Community Psychotherapists

Open access
Cook, Joan M., Biyanova, Tatyana, Coyne, James C.·2009·Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract

Over 1,600 North American psychotherapists from a wide range of disciplines and practice settings completed an open-ended question on perceived barriers to adoption of new treatments as part of an internet survey. Content analysis indicated that there were five overall themes: clinician attitudes, client characteristics, contextual or institutional factors, training issues and other. The most frequently endorsed theme revolved around training issues, particularly, insufficient time and cost for training, lack of confidence in mastering the technique, and lack of opportunities for refining skills. Specific ideas for overcoming these barriers are identified.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10488-008-0198-3

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Determinants of practice can be identified through formal assessment processes, theory or conceptual models, research literature, or informal approaches such as brainstorming.

    “While these determinants of practice could be identified through formal assessment processes, they could also be identified using theory or conceptual models e.g., [87], research literature e.g., [59,60,88-90], or more informal approaches such as brainstorming e.g., [55].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, J. M., Biyanova, T., & Coyne, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Cook, Joan M.
Venue
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published
2008-12-23
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
83-90
ISSN
  • 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3289
OpenAlex
W1968976924
Cited by
85
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH070859)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
psychotherapists, clinician attitudes, psychotherapy training, clinician confidence, client characteristics, institutional factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Evidence-Based Medicine, Health Care Surveys, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review