Cited by 103Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

A randomized control trial examining the effect of acceptance and commitment training on clinician willingness to use evidence-based pharmacotherapy

Varra, Alethea A., Hayes, Steven C., Roget, Nancy, Fisher, Gary·2008·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment training (ACT) for increasing drug and alcohol counselors' willingness to use evidence-based agonist and antagonist pharmacotherapy. Fifty-nine drug and alcohol counselors were randomly assigned to either a 1-day ACT workshop or a 1-day educational control workshop. Both groups then attended a 2-day workshop on empirically supported treatments for substance abuse. Measures were taken at pre- and posttraining and 3-month follow-up on reported use of pharmacotherapy, willingness to use pharmacotherapy, perceived barriers to implementing new treatments, and general acceptance. As compared with those in the education alone condition, participants in the ACT condition showed significantly higher rates of referrals to pharmacotherapy at follow-up, rated barriers to learning new treatments as less believable at posttraining and follow-up, and showed greater psychological flexibility at posttraining and follow-up. Mediational analyses indicated that reduced believability of barriers and greater psychological flexibility mediated the impact of the intervention. Results support the idea that acceptance-based interventions may be helpful in addressing the psychological factors related to poor adoption of evidence-based treatments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.76.3.449

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varra, A. A., Hayes, S. C., Roget, N., & Fisher, G.
Affiliations
VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2008
Volume
76
Issue
3
Pages
449-458
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2166309440
Cited by
101
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
10.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (TI12899)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
acceptance and commitment training, evidence-based pharmacotherapy, addiction counselors, treatment adoption, implementation barriers, psychological flexibility, acceptance-based interventions, medication-assisted treatment, naltrexone, bupropion, empirically supported treatments, counselor education
MeSH terms
Combined Modality Therapy, Drug Therapy, Education, Medical, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychotherapy, Social Support, Teaching, Evidence-Based Medicine, Substance-Related Disorders, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review