The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward the Effective and Efficient Measurement of Implementation Fidelity
Open accessAbstract
Implementation science in mental health is informed by other academic disciplines and industries. Conceptual and methodological territory charted in psychotherapy research is pertinent to two elements of the conceptual model of implementation posited by Aarons and colleagues (2010)—implementation fidelity and innovation feedback systems. Key characteristics of scientifically validated fidelity instruments, and of the feasibility of their use in routine care, are presented. The challenges of ensuring fidelity measurement methods are both effective (scientifically validated) and efficient (feasible and useful in routine care) are identified as are examples of implementation research attempting to balance these attributes of fidelity measurement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The standards for educational and psychological testing.
Eignor, D. R. (2013) · APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 1: Test theory and testing and assessment in industrial and organizational psychology. · doi:10.1037/14047-013 · Cited by 6,988
(1997) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089297765555359 · Cited by 3,916
(2005) · Cited by 3,748
Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors
Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7 · Cited by 3,240
Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing
(2007) · Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics · doi:10.4135/9781412952644.n432 · Cited by 3,126
Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.
García, E. J. (2017) · Revista Española de Pedagogía · doi:10.22550/2174-0909.3051 · Cited by 2,217
Fidelity Criteria: Development, Measurement, and Validation
MOWBRAY, C. (2003) · The American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1016/s1098-2140(03)00057-2 · Cited by 884
Testing the integrity of a psychotherapy protocol: Assessment of adherence and competence
Waltz, J., Addis, M. E., Koerner, K., & Jacobson, N. S. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.61.4.620 · Cited by 873
Chorpita, B. F., Daleiden, E. L., & Weisz, J. R. (2005) · Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s11020-005-1962-6 · Cited by 717
Chorpita, B. F., & Daleiden, E. L. (2009) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0014565 · Cited by 687
Cited by
Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors
Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7 · Cited by 3,240
“However, technology transfer may be facilitated by adjusting implementation plans to the culture of a human service agency (Keller and Galanter 1999) and, although a difficult task, some aspects of organizational culture can be changed (Schraeder et al. 2005).”
BackgroundSchreibman, L., Dawson, G., Stahmer, A. C., Landa, R., Rogers, S. J., McGee, G. G., Kasari, C., Ingersoll, B., Kaiser, A. P., Bruinsma, Y., et al. (2015) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2407-8 · Cited by 1,421
Wiltsey Stirman, S., Kimberly, J., Cook, N., Calloway, A., Castro, F., & Charns, M. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-17 · Cited by 1,355
Mixed method designs in implementation research
Palinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., Horwitz, S., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M., & Landsverk, J. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0314-z · Cited by 1,187
Stirman, S. W., Miller, C. J., Toder, K., & Calloway, A. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-65 · Cited by 691
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoenwald, S. K., Garland, A. F., Chapman, J. E., Frazier, S. L., Sheidow, A. J., & Southam-Gerow, M. A.
- Venue
- Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
- Published
- 2010-10-20
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-43
- ISSN
- 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3289
- OpenAlex
- W1973952659
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 36.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward the Effective and Efficient Measurement of Implementation Fidelity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10488-010-0321-0
- The paper
- Schoenwald, S. K., Garland, A. F., Chapman, J. E., Frazier, S. L., Sheidow, A. J., & Southam-Gerow, M. A. (2011). Toward the Effective and Efficient Measurement of Implementation Fidelity. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0321-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
