Cited by 10Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and Access

Service Use Findings from the Child STEPs Effectiveness Trial: Additional Support for Modular Designs

Research Network on Youth Mental Health, Park, Alayna L., Tsai, Katherine H., Guan, Karen, Reding, Michael E. J., Chorpita, Bruce F., Weisz, John R.·2016·Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract

This study expands upon the Chorpita et al. (J Consult Clin Psychol 81:999-1009, 2013) findings by examining the impact of treatment protocol on youths' service utilization up to 2 years after starting an episode of: standard manualized treatment (Standard); modular treatment (Modular); or usual care (UC). Results showed that youths who received Modular accessed fewer service settings at their one-year follow-up relative to youths who received Standard or UC. Findings suggest that modular treatment may offer an advantage over standardized treatment manuals and UC in terms of sustained clinical benefits, and highlight the importance of treatment design considerations for service systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10488-015-0625-1

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modular treatment outperformed standardized manual-based treatments and usual care in number of service settings utilized one-year after treatment initiated.

    “Modular treatment outperformed both standardized manual-based treatments and usual care in rate of clinical improvement and number of diagnoses at post-treatment (Chorpita et al., 2013), as well as number of service settings utilized one-year after treatment was initiated (Park et al., 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Research Network on Youth Mental Health, Park, A. L., Tsai, K. H., Guan, K., Reding, M. E. J., Chorpita, B. F., & Weisz, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Park, Alayna L.
Venue
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published
2015-01-13
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
135-140
ISSN
  • 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3289
OpenAlex
W2004660196
Cited by
10
References
19
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
treatment manual, service utilization, child and adolescent mental health services, treatment protocols, usual care, long-term outcomes, mental health system
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care, Mental Disorders, Child, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, School Health Services, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review