Cited by 14Health Policy Implementation ScienceEvaluation and Performance AssessmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Commentary: Challenges and Opportunites in the Assessment of Fidelity and Related Constructs

Open access
Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey·2020·Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10488-020-01069-4

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing literatures on measuring fidelity, learning, and homework compliance provide a foundation, but greater integration and precision (e.g., regarding timing, specific active elements) is needed.

    “Existing literatures on measuring fidelity, learning, and homework compliance provide a foundation, but greater integration and precision (e.g., regarding timing, specific active elements, etc.) is needed (Stir­ man, 2020; Webb, DeRubeis, & Barber, 2010).”

    From Measuring the active elements of cognitive-behavioral therapies (2023) · cites this paper as Stirman, 2020

    The Introduction calls for measuring fidelity at multiple timepoints and identifying which intervention elements matter; the Conclusion calls for refining fidelity measures and assessing complementary constructs. The paper does not establish a literature on measuring learning or homework compliance as part of that foundation. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stirman, S. W.
Affiliations
National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (US)
Corresponding author
Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey
Venue
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published
2020-07-27
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
932-934
ISSN
  • 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3289
OpenAlex
W3045691444
Cited by
14
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH 106506, R01 MH 112628)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
fidelity assessment, implementation fidelity, fidelity measures, program components, adherence, implementation evaluation, mental health services
MeSH terms
Humans, Program Evaluation, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review