Cited by 99Emotional Intelligence and PerformanceSocial Skills and EducationPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Evidence of the practical utility of Wong’s emotional intelligence scale in Hong Kong and mainland China

Wong, Chi-Sum, Wong, Ping-Man, Law, Kenneth S.·2007·Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10490-006-9024-1

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wong, C.-S., Wong, P.-M., & Law, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Wong, Chi-Sum
Venue
Asia Pacific Journal of Management
Published
2007-01-06
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
43-60
ISSN
  • 0217-4561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9958
OpenAlex
W2060416889
Cited by
98
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Asia Pacific Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
emotional intelligence, practicality, cross-cultural validation, Hong Kong, mainland China, Asian context

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review