Cited by 16Water Quality Monitoring TechnologiesSmart Agriculture and AIInnovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems

Smart sensing and anomaly detection for microalgae culture based on LoRaWAN sensors and LSTM autoencoder

Open access
Soon, Chin Fhong, Jamia’an, Mahdzir, Mohamed Sunar, Norshuhaila, Arifin, Siti Nor Hidayah, Tay, Kim Gaik, Heng, Chris, See, Chan Hwang, Mat Nayan, Nadirul Hasraf +1 more·2025·Aquaculture International

Abstract

The increasing demand for sustainable aquaculture solutions has accelerated interest in microalgae as an alternative fish feed source. This study presents a novel integration of Long-Range Wide Area Network (LoRaWAN) sensors and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) autoencoder model to enable real-time monitoring and anomaly detection in 300L outdoor microalgae cultivation. A solar-powered Internet of Things (IoT) sensor and LoRaWAN system were developed to monitor key water quality parameters such as pH, water temperature, electrical conductivity (EC), and oxidation–reduction potential (ORP). ORP was identified as a sensitive alternative for monitoring microalgae growth dynamics and contamination. The LSTM autoencoder, trained on normal ORP data, effectively distinguished abnormal culture patterns based on reconstruction errors, achieving high precision (1.000), recall (0.944), F1-score (0.971), and AUC-ROC (1.000). The addition of a moving average filter improved data stability for model training of filtered sensor signals. A bespoke visual reconstruction error heatmap further simplified anomaly interpretation for end-users. This framework advances smart aquaculture by enabling timely intervention, supporting sustainable microalgae production, and aligning with global food security and environmental sustainability goals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10499-025-02104-7

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even with the support of digital tools, environmental and nutritional factors such as temperature, pH, nitrogen and phosphorus balance, and availability of inorganic and organic carbon continue to be decisive for productivity, requiring continuous monitoring and increasingly sophisticated control strategies.

    “Moreover, even with the support of digital tools, environmental and nutritional factors—such as temperature, pH, nitrogen and phosphorus balance, as well as the availability of inorganic and organic carbon—continue to be decisive for productivity, requiring continuous monitoring and increasingly sophisticated control strategies (Gil et al., 2025; Soon et al., 2025).”

    From Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design (2025) · cites this paper as Soon et al., 2025

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ahmed U, Nazir M, Sarwar A, Ali T, Aggoune E-HM, Shahzad T et al (2025) Signature-based intrusion detection using machine learning and deep learning approaches empowered with fuzzy clustering. Sci Rep 15(1):1726
  2. Ahn H, Yeo I (2021) Deep-learning-based approach to anomaly detection techniques for large acoustic data in machine operation. Sensors (Basel) 21(16):5446

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soon, C. F., Jamia’an, M., Mohamed Sunar, N., Arifin, S. N. H., Tay, K. G., Heng, C., See, C. H., Mat Nayan, N. H., & Tee, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Tun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia (MY)
  • Curtin University Sarawak (MY)
  • Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
Corresponding author
Soon, Chin Fhong
Venue
Aquaculture International
Published
2025-07-11
Volume
33
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0967-6120 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-143X
OpenAlex
W4412185167
Cited by
16
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 4
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aquaculture International (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
Keywords
microalgae cultivation, anomaly detection, LSTM autoencoder, Internet of Things, redox potential, water quality monitoring, solar-powered sensors, reconstruction error, moving average filter, smart aquaculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review