Cited by 56Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Improving microalgae growth modeling of outdoor cultivation with light history data using machine learning models: A comparative study

Yeh, Yen-Cheng, Syed, Tehreem, Brinitzer, Gordon, Frick, Konstantin, Schmid-Staiger, Ulrike, Haasdonk, Bernard, Tovar, Günter E.M., Krujatz, Felix +2 more·2023·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

Accurate prediction of microalgae growth is crucial for understanding the impacts of light dynamics and optimizing production. Although various mathematical models have been proposed, only a few of them have been validated in outdoor cultivation. This study aims to investigate the use of machine learning algorithms in microalgae growth modeling. Outdoor cultivation data of Phaeodactylum tricornutum in flat-panel airlift photobioreactors for 50 days were used to compare the performance of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) with traditional models, namely Monod and Haldane. The results indicate that the machine learning models outperform the traditional models due to their ability to utilize light history as input. Moreover, the LSTM model shows an excellent ability to describe the light acclimation effect. Last, two potential applications of these models are demonstrated: 1) use as a biomass soft sensor and 2) development of an optimal harvest strategy for outdoor cultivation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129882

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeh, Y.-C., Syed, T., Brinitzer, G., Frick, K., Schmid-Staiger, U., Haasdonk, B., Tovar, G. E. M., Krujatz, F., Mädler, J., & Urbas, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Stuttgart (DE)
  • Institute of Automation (DE)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology (DE)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Corresponding author
Yeh, Yen-Cheng
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
390
Pages
129882
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387911354
Cited by
56
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 10
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Stuttgart Center for Simulation Science, Universität Stuttgart
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
Phaeodactylum tricornutum, open-field cultivation, history of light, light acclimation, airlift photobioreactor, long short-term memory, support vector regression, Monod kinetics, Haldane model
MeSH terms
Culture Media, Diatoms, Biomass, Microalgae, Photobioreactors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review