The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Legal requirements on explainability in machine learning
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization
Selvaraju, R. R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., & Batra, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.74 · Cited by 24,513
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,190
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555
Rudin, C. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x · Cited by 10,561
Wrappers for feature subset selection
Kohavi, R., & John, G. H. (1997) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(97)00043-x · Cited by 9,096
Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., & Zisserman, A. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6034 · Cited by 5,370
The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information
Pasquale, F. (2015) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674736061 · Cited by 3,796
Irrelevant Features and the Subset Selection Problem
John, G. H., Kohavi, R., & Pfleger, K. (1994) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-55860-335-6.50023-4 · Cited by 2,403
Efficient Feature Selection via Analysis of Relevance and Redundancy
Yu, L., & Liu, H. (2004) · Cited by 1,969
The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information
(2016) · Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1177/0094306116641409c · Cited by 1,334
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2017) · International Data Privacy Law · doi:10.1093/idpl/ipx005 · Cited by 1,308
Fisher, A., Rudin, C., & Dominici, F. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.01489 · Cited by 1,165
Αλέτρας, Ν., Tsarapatsanis, D., Preoțiuc-Pietro, D., & Lampos, V. (2016) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.93 · Cited by 813
Mittelstadt, B., Russell, C., & Wachter, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287574 · Cited by 794
Lepri, B., Oliver, N., Letouzé, E., Pentland, A., & Vinck, P. (2018) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0279-x · Cited by 709
A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models
Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Giannotti, F., & Pedreschi, D. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3236009 · Cited by 629
Meaningful information and the right to explanation
Selbst, A. D., & Powles, J. (2017) · International Data Privacy Law · doi:10.1093/idpl/ipx022 · Cited by 516
Accountability of AI Under the Law: The Role of Explanation
Doshi-Velez, F., Kortz, M., Budish, R., Bavitz, C., Gershman, S. J., O'Brien, D., Scott, K., Shieber, S., Waldo, J., Weinberger, D., et al. (2017) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3064761 · Cited by 457 · cited 3×
“The out-of-bag error is defined as the average error made in the prediction of each instance xi for each decision tree that has not been trained using this xi (Breiman 2001).”
MethodThe Intuitive Appeal of Explainable Machines
Selbst, A. D., & Barocas, S. (2018) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3126971 · Cited by 392
Legal Judgment Prediction via Topological Learning
Zhong, H., Guo, Z., Tu, C., Xiao, C., Liu, Z., & Sun, M. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1390 · Cited by 377
Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basis
Luo, B., Feng, Y., Xu, J., Zhang, X., & Zhao, D. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1289 · Cited by 348
Palau, R. M., & Moens, M. (2009) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1145/1568234.1568246 · Cited by 321
Supersparse linear integer models for optimized medical scoring systems
Ustun, B., & Rudin, C. D. (2015) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-015-5528-6 · Cited by 316
Malgieri, G., & Comandé, G. (2017) · International Data Privacy Law · doi:10.1093/idpl/ipx019 · Cited by 271
Discriminative training of Markov logic networks
Singla, P., & Domingos, P. (2005) · Cited by 247
Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes
Ashley, K. D., & Brüninghaus, S. (2009) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-009-9077-9 · Cited by 159
Ye, H., Jiang, X., Luo, Z., & Chao, W. (2018) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1168 · Cited by 159
Enslaving the Algorithm: From a “Right to an Explanation” to a “Right to Better Decisions”?
Edwards, L., & Veale, M. (2018) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2701152 · Cited by 141
Fisher, A., Rudin, C. D., & Dominici, F. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 86
Interpretability of machine learning models and representations: an introduction.
Bibal, A., & Frénay, B. (2016) · Repository of the University of Namur · Cited by 77
Self-citationData-centric and logic-based models for automated legal problem solving
Branting, L. K. (2017) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-017-9193-x · Cited by 68
Enslaving the Algorithm: From a 'Right to an Explanation' to a 'Right to Better Decisions'?
Edwards, L., & Veale, M. (2018) · Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) · Cited by 53
Research and Design on Cognitive Computing Framework for Predicting Judicial Decisions
Li, J., Zhang, G., Yu, L., & Meng, T. (2018) · Journal of Signal Processing Systems · doi:10.1007/s11265-018-1429-9 · Cited by 31
Supersparse Linear Integer Models for Interpretable Classification
Ustun, B., Tracà, S., & Rudin, C. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1306.6677 · Cited by 26
Autin, J.-L. (2011) · Revue française d administration publique · doi:10.3917/rfap.137.0085 · Cited by 20
La motivation des décisions juridictionnelles : exigence(s) du droit au procès équitable
Alonso, C. (2012) · Presses de l'Université Toulouse Capitole eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.putc.589 · Cited by 12
Valid interpretation of feature relevance for linear data mappings
Frénay, B., Hofmann, D., Schulz, A., Biehl, M. L., & Hammer, B. (2014) · IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM) · doi:10.1109/cidm.2014.7008661 · Cited by 10
Self-citationKodratoff, Y. (1994) · AI Communications · doi:10.3233/aic-1994-7201 · Cited by 9
Supersparse Linear Integer Models for Predictive Scoring SystemsPreprint
Ustun, B., Tracà, S., & Rudin, C. D. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1306.5860 · Cited by 8
La motivation des décisions administratives en droit comparé
Wiener, C. (1969) · Revue internationale de droit comparé · doi:10.3406/ridc.1969.17535 · Cited by 6
Regards sur le droit au procès équitable
Lavergne, B., & Mezaguer, M. (2012) · Presses de l'Université Toulouse Capitole eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.putc.564 · Cited by 5
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Goodman B, Flaxman S (2016) EU regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation”. In: ICML workshop on human interpretability in machine learning, New York, USA
- Lipton ZC (2016) The mythos of model interpretability. In: ICML workshop on human interpretability of machine learning, New York, USA
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interpretable machine learning: Fundamental principles and 10 grand challenges
Rudin, C., Chen, C., Chen, Z., Huang, H., Semenova, L., & Zhong, C. (2022) · Statistics Surveys · doi:10.1214/21-ss133 · Cited by 958
Kiseleva, A., Kotzinos, D., & De Hert, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.879603 · Cited by 278
Hamon, R., Junklewitz, H., Sanchez, I., Malgieri, G., & Hert, P. D. (2022) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2021.3129960 · Cited by 177
Choice modelling in the age of machine learning - Discussion paper
van Cranenburgh, S., Wang, S., Vij, A., Pereira, F. C., & Walker, J. L. (2021) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100340 · Cited by 183
Deep learning in insurance: Accuracy and model interpretability using TabNet
McDonnell, K., Murphy, F., Sheehan, B., Masello, L., & Castignani, G. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119543 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Bibal, A., Lognoul, M., de Streel, A., & Frénay, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Namur (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Bibal, Adrien
- ORCID
- Bibal, Adrien
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence and Law
- Published
- 2020-07-30
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-169
- ISSN
- 0924-8463 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8382
- OpenAlex
- W3046377295
- Semantic Scholar
- f2929a51055394f22542202500345b31b3791b12
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 9.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Artificial Intelligence and Law (publishedVersion)
- Repository of the University of Namur (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- explainability, model interpretability, legal requirements, black-box models, deep learning, algorithmic accountability, ethical use of AI, public decision-making, private decision-making, interdisciplinary research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review