CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 200Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologySexual function and dysfunction studiesMarriage and Sexual Relationships

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of Masturbation and Associated Factors in a British National Probability Survey

Open access
Gerressu, Makeda, Mercer, Catherine H., Graham, Cynthia A., Wellings, Kaye, Johnson, Anne M.·2008·Archives of Sexual Behavior
DOI 10.1007/s10508-006-9123-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

A stratified probability sample survey of the British general population, aged 16 to 44 years, was conducted from 1999 to 2001 (N = 11,161) using face-to-face interviewing and computer-assisted self-interviewing. We used these data to estimate the population prevalence of masturbation, and to identify sociodemographic, sexual behavioral, and attitudinal factors associated with reporting this behavior. Seventy-three percent of men and 36.8% of women reported masturbating in the 4 weeks prior to interview (95% confidence interval 71.5%-74.4% and 35.4%-38.2%, respectively). A number of sociodemographic and behavioral factors were associated with reporting masturbation. Among both men and women, reporting masturbation increased with higher levels of education and social class and was more common among those reporting sexual function problems. For women, masturbation was more likely among those who reported more frequent vaginal sex in the last four weeks, a greater repertoire of sexual activity (such as reporting oral and anal sex), and more sexual partners in the last year. In contrast, the prevalence of masturbation was lower among men reporting more frequent vaginal sex. Both men and women reporting same-sex partner(s) were significantly more likely to report masturbation. Masturbation is a common sexual practice with significant variations in reporting between men and women.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10508-006-9123-6

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Barbey, M. A. (1991). Switzerland's videotext computer sex education programme. Planned Parenthood in Europe, 20, 22–23.
  2. International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), Office for East, South East Asia and Oceania Region (ESEAOR). (1996). Teenagers’ concerns about sex. People and Development Challenges, 3, 11–12.
  3. Royal College of Physicians, Psychiatrists and General Practitioners. (1995). Alcohol and the heart in perspective: Sensible limits reaffirmed. London: Royal College of Physicians, Psychiatrists and General Practitioners.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 200

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gerressu, M., Mercer, C. H., Graham, C. A., Wellings, K., & Johnson, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Mortimer Market Centre (GB)
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Gerressu, Makeda
ORCID
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2007-02-27
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
266-278
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
DOI
10.1007/s10508-006-9123-6
OpenAlex
W1984855522
Semantic Scholar
0f84f6d008b9f6c88f354d8c0b36994e87133365
Cited by
200
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Keywords
masturbation, prevalence, sexual behavior, sociodemographic factors, vaginal intercourse, sexual partners, same-sex couples, gender differences, sexual health attitudes, British population
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Coitus, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Masturbation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Sexual Partners, Socioeconomic Factors, Incidence, Heterosexuality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review