Cited by 104Sexual Differentiation and DisordersSpatial Cognition and NavigationGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities

Visuospatial Performance on an Internet Line Judgment Task and Potential Hormonal Markers: Sex, Sexual Orientation, and 2D:4D

Collaer, Marcia L., Reimers, Stian, Manning, John T.·2007·Archives of Sexual Behavior

Abstract

We investigated whether performance on a visuospatial line judgment task, the Judgment of Line Angle and Position-15 test (JLAP-15), showed evidence of sensitivity to early sex steroid exposure by examining how it related to sex, as well as to sexual orientation and 2D:4D digit ratios. Participants were drawn from a large Internet study with over 250,000 participants. In the main sample (ages 12-58 years), males outperformed females on the JLAP-15, showing a moderate effect size for sex. In agreement with a prenatal sex hormone hypothesis, line judgment accuracy in adults related to 2D:4D and sexual orientation, both of which are postulated to be influenced by early steroids. In both sexes, better visuospatial performance was associated with lower (more male-typical) digit ratios. For men, heterosexual participants outperformed homosexual/bisexual participants on the JLAP-15 and, for women, homosexual/bisexual participants outperformed heterosexual participants. In children aged 8-10 years, presumed to be a largely prepubertal group, boys also outperformed girls. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that visuospatial ability is influenced by early sex steroids, although they do not rule out alternative explanations or additional influences. More broadly, such results support a prenatal sex hormone hypothesis that degree of androgen exposure may influence the neural circuitry underlying cognition (visuospatial ability) and sexual orientation as well as aspects of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10508-006-9152-1

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collaer, M. L., Reimers, S., & Manning, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Middlebury College (US)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of Lancashire (GB)
Corresponding author
Collaer, Marcia L.
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2007-03-23
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
177-192
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
OpenAlex
W2028652993
Cited by
104
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Keywords
visuospatial ability, 2D:4D digit ratio, sexual orientation, sex differences, androgen exposure, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anthropometry, Female, Fingers, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Space Perception, Testosterone, Visual Perception, Reproducibility of Results, Sex Distribution, Homosexuality, Male, Homosexuality, Female, Sexuality, Heterosexuality, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review