CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsPhilosophy and Theoretical SciencePhilosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Ollivier–Poulin–Zurek Definition of Objectivity

Open access
Fields, Chris·2014·Axiomathes
DOI 10.1007/s10516-013-9218-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10516-013-9218-3

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Blume-Kohout R, Zurek WH (2006) Quantum Darwinism: entanglement, branches, and the emergent classicality of redundantly stored quantum information. Phys Rev A 73:062310 arXiv:quant-ph/0505031v2 · DOI
  2. Bohr N (1928) The quantum postulate and the recent developments of atomic theory. Nature 121:580–590 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bousso R, Susskind L (2011) The multiverse interpretation of quantum mechanics. Preprint arXiv:1105.3796v1 [hep-th] · DOI
  4. Brune M, Hagley E, Dreyer J, Maître X, Maali A, Wunderlich C, Raimond JM, Haroche S (1996) Observing the progressive decoherence of the “meter” in a quantum measurement. Phys Rev Lett 77:4887–4890 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chomsky N (1965) Cartesian linguistics. Harper and Row, New York
  6. Everett H III (1957) ‘Relative state’ formulation of quantum mechanics. Rev Mod Phys 29:454–462 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Fields C (2010) Quantum Darwinism requires an extra-theoretical assumption of encoding redundancy. Int J Theor Phys 49:2523–2527, arXiv:1003.5136v2 [quant-ph] · DOI
  8. Fields C (2011) Classical system boundaries cannot be determined within quantum Darwinism. Phys Essays 24:518–522, arXiv:1008.0283v4 [quant-ph] · DOI
  9. Fields C (2012a) If physics is an information science, what is an observer? Information 3:92–123, arXiv:1108.4865v2 [quant-ph] · DOI
  10. Fields C (2012b) A model-theoretic interpretation of environment-induced superselection. Int J Gen Syst 41:847–859, arXiv:1202.1019v2 [quant-ph] · DOI
  11. Fields C (2012c) Implementation of classical communication in a quantum world. Information 3:809–831, arXiv:1206.4247v3 [quant-ph] · DOI
  12. Fields C (2013) Bell’s theorem from Moore’s theorem. Int J Gen Syst 42:376–385, arXiv:1201.3672v6 [quant-ph] · DOI
  13. Fuchs C (2010) QBism: the perimeter of quantum Bayesianism. Preprint arXiv:1003.5209v1 [quant-ph] · arXiv
  14. Griffiths RB (2007) Types of quantum information. Phys Rev 76:062320, arXiv:0707.3752v2 [quant-ph] · DOI
  15. Griffiths RB (2011) A consistent quantum ontology. Preprint arXiv:1105.3932v1 [quant-ph] · arXiv
  16. Hartle JB (2008) The quasiclassical realms of this quantum universe. Found Phys 41:982–1006, arXiv:0806.3776v5 [quant-ph] · DOI
  17. Kiefer C, Queisser F, Starobinsky A (2011) Cosmological constant from decoherence. Class Quantum Gravity 28: 125022, arXiv:1010.5331v2 [astro-ph.CO] · DOI
  18. Landsman NP (2007) Between classical and quantum. In: Butterfield J, Earman J (eds) Handbook of the philosophy of science: philosophy of physics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 417–553, arXiv:quant-ph/0506082v2 · DOI
  19. Marr D (1982) Vision. Freeman, New York
  20. Martineau P (2006) On the decoherence of primordial fluctuations during inflation. Class Quantum Gravity 24:5817–5834, arXiv:astro-ph/0601.134v1 · DOI
  21. Moore EF (1956) Gedankenexperiments on sequential machines. In: Shannon CW, McCarthy J (eds) Autonoma studies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 129–155
  22. Ollivier H, Poulin D, Zurek WH (2004) Objective properties from subjective quantum states: environment as a witness. Phys Rev Lett 93:220401, arXiv:quant-ph/0307229v2 · DOI
  23. Ollivier H, Poulin D, Zurek WH (2005) Environment as a witness: selective proliferation of information and emergence of objectivity in a quantum universe. Phys Rev A 72:042113, arXiv:quant-ph/0408125v3 · DOI
  24. Reoderer JG (2005) Information and its role in nature. Springer, Berlin · DOI
  25. Riedel CJ, Zurek WH (2010) Quantum Darwinism in an everyday environment: huge redundancy in scattered photons. Phys Rev Lett 105: 020404, arXiv:1001.3419 [quant-ph] · DOI
  26. Schlosshauer M (2004) Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum theory. Rev Mod Phys 76:1267–1305, arXiv:quant-ph/0312059v4 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Schlosshauer M (2007) Decoherence and the quantum to classical transition. Springer, Berlin
  28. Tegmark M (2010) Many worlds in context. In: Saunders S, Barrett J, Kent A, Wallace D (eds) Many Worlds? Everett, quantum theory and reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 553–581, arXiv:0905.2182v2 [quant-ph] · DOI
  29. Wallace D (2008) Philosophy of quantum mechanics. In: Rickles D (ed) The Ashgate companion to contemporary philosophy of physics. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 16–98, arXiv:0712.0149v1 [quant-ph] · arXiv
  30. Wallace D (2010) Decoherence and ontology. In: Saunders S, Barrett J, Kent A, Wallace DD (eds) Many Worlds? Everett, quantum theory and reality, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 53–72 · DOI
  31. Wigner EP (1962) Remarks on the mind-body question. In: Good IJ ((eds) The scientist speculates, Basic Books, New York, pp 284–302
  32. Zeh D (2006) Roots and fruits of decoherence. In: Duplantier B, Raimond J-M, Rivasseau V (eds) Quantum decoherence. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 151–175, arXiv:quant-ph/0512078v2 · DOI
  33. Zurek WH (1981) Pointer basis of the quantum apparatus: into what mixture does the wave packet collapse? Phys Rev D 24:1516–1525 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Zurek WH (1982) Environment-induced superselection rules. Phys Rev D 26:1862–1880 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Zurek WH (1998) Decoherence, einselection and the existential interpretation (the rough guide). Philos Trans R Soc A 356:1793–1821 · DOI
  36. Zurek WH (2003) Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Rev Mod Phys 75:715–775, arXiv:quant-ph/0105127v3 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Zurek WH (2005) Probabilities from entanglement, born’s rule p k = |ψ k |2 from envariance. Phys Rev A 71: 052105, arXiv:quant-ph/0405161v2 · DOI
  38. Zurek WH (2007) Relative states and the environment: einselection, envariance, quantum Darwinism, and the existential interpretation. Preprint arXiv:0707.2832v1 [quant-ph] · arXiv
  39. Zwolak M, Quan HT, Zurek WH (2009) Quantum Darwinism in a hazy environment. Phys Rev Lett 103:110402, arXiv:0904.0418v2 [quant-ph] · DOI
  40. Zwolak M, Quan HT, Zurek WH (2010) Quantum Darwinism in non-ideal environments. Phys Rev A 81:062110, arXiv:0911.4307 [quant-ph] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fields, C.
Corresponding author
Fields, Chris
Venue
Axiomathes
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-07-02
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
137-156
ISSN
  • 1122-1151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8390
DOI
10.1007/s10516-013-9218-3
OpenAlex
W2027391834
Cited by
10
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Axiomathes (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
Keywords
objectivity, decoherence, quantum Darwinism, Hilbert space decomposition, emergence of classicality, physical laws, quantum measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review