Cited by 1,700Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsAtomic and Molecular PhysicsPhilosophy and History of Science

The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory1

BOHR, N.·1928·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/121580a0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BOHR, N.
Corresponding author
BOHR, N.
Venue
Nature
Published
1928-04-14
Volume
121
Issue
3050
Pages
580-590
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1991985130
Cited by
1,700
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 140 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 48
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
quantum postulates, atomic theory, quantum foundations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review