Cited by 65Cognitive Abilities and TestingGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

A Twin Study of the Genetics of High Cognitive Ability Selected from 11,000 Twin Pairs in Six Studies from Four Countries

Open access
Haworth, Claire M. A., Wright, Margaret J., Martin, Nicolas W., Martin, Nicholas G., Boomsma, Dorret I., Bartels, Meike, Posthuma, Danielle, Davis, Oliver S. P. +10 more·2009·Behavior Genetics

Abstract

Although much genetic research has addressed normal variation in intelligence, little is known about the etiology of high cognitive abilities. Using data from 11,000 twin pairs (age range = 6-71 years) from the genetics of high cognitive abilities consortium, we investigated the genetic and environmental etiologies of high general cognitive ability (g). Age-appropriate psychometric cognitive tests were administered to the twins and used to create g scores standardized within each study. Liability-threshold model fitting was used to estimate genetic and environmental parameters for the top 15% of the distribution of g. Genetic influence for high g was substantial (0.50, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.41-0.60). Shared environmental influences were moderate (0.28, 0.19-0.37). We conclude that genetic variation contributes substantially to high g in Australia, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10519-009-9262-3

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was significant support for age differences in the a and c parameters, indicating that genetic variance increases and shared environmental variance decreases with age.

    “there was significant support for age differences in the a and c parameters, indicating that genetic variance increases and shared environmental variance decreases with age”

    From Large Cross-National Differences in Gene × Socioeconomic Status Interaction on Intelligence (2016) · cites this paper as Haworth et al., 2009

    The Abstract reports significant age-related increases in heritability and a decline in shared environmental influence for the broader 11,000-pair sample, citing an earlier analysis. But this paper’s Results (Heterogeneity model-fitting analyses; page unavailable) found no significant age-group differences in A, C, or E for its high-cognitive-ability sample. The claim does not distinguish the earlier finding from this paper’s own result. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The well-established phenomenon of increasing genetic influences and decreasing shared environmental influences on intelligence with childhood age was replicated in the current meta-analytic dataset.

    “We also replicated the well-established phenomenon of increasing genetic influences, and decreasing shared environmental influences, on intelligence with childhood age (e.g. Briley & Tucker-Drob, 2013; Haworth et al., 2009) in the current meta-analytic dataset.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

20 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Deary IJ Spinath FM Bates TC Genetics of intelligence European Journal of Human Genetics 2006 14 690 700 16721405
  2. DeFries JC Gray DB Kavanagh JF Colorado reading project Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia 1985 Parkton, MD York Press 107 122
  3. DeFries JC Filipek PA Fulker DW Olson RK Pennington BF Smith SD Colorado Learning Disabilities Research Center Learning Disability Quarterly 1997 8 7 19
  4. DeFries JC Olson RK Pennington RF Smith SD Colorado Reading Project: An update The reading brain: The biological basis of dyslexia 1991 Parkton, MD York Press 53 87
  5. Kovas Y Haworth CMA Dale PS Plomin R The genetic and environmental origins of learning abilities and disabilities in the early school years Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 2007 72 vii-160 PMC2784897 17995572
  6. Neale MC Boker SM Xie G Maes H Mx: Statistical Modeling (7th ed.) 2006 VCU Box 900126, Richmond, VA 23298: Department of Psychiatry
  7. Plomin R DeFries JC McClear GE McGuffin P Behavioral Genetics 2008 5th Edition New York Worth
  8. Polderman TJC Gosso MF Posthuma D van Beijsterveldt TC Heutink P Verhulst FC A longitudinal twin study on IQ, executive functioning, and attention problems during childhood and early adolescence Acta Neurologica Belgica 2006 106 191 17323837
  9. Raven JC Court JH Raven J Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales 1996 Oxford Oxford University Press
  10. Smith C Concordance in twins: Methods and interpretation American Journal of Human Genetics 1974 26 454 466 4858380 PMC1762601
  11. Thorndike RL Hagen EP Sattler JM Guide for administering and scoring the fourth edition: Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale 1986 Chicago, IL Riverside
  12. Turkheimer E Haley A Waldron M D'Onofrio B Gottesman II Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children Psychological Science 2003 14 623 628 14629696
  13. Wechsler D Wechsler intelligence scale for children -- Third Edition UK (WISCIIIUK) Manual 1992 London The Psychological Corporation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haworth, C. M. A., Wright, M. J., Martin, N. W., Martin, N. G., Boomsma, D. I., Bartels, M., Posthuma, D., Davis, O. S. P., Brant, A. M., Corley, R. P., Hewitt, J. K., Iacono, W. G., McGue, M., Thompson, L. A., Hart, S. A., Petrill, S. A., Lubinski, D., & Plomin, R.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Plomin, Robert
Venue
Behavior Genetics
Published
2009-04-21
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
359-370
ISSN
  • 0001-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3297
OpenAlex
W2103117630
Cited by
65
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (HD010333, DA011015)
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (051-02-060, NWO/ SPI 56-464-14192, 575-25-012, NWO 480-04-004, 56‐464‐14192, Spi-56-464-14192, VIDI-016-065-318, 14192, 480-04-004)
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01hd019802-04a1, 5p01hd011681-12)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01 DA013240)
  • Medical Research Council (G0500079)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA009367, R01AA009367, R37AA009367)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH043899, R01MH043899)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 011015, P60DA011015, R01DA013240, R01DA005147)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD038075, HD010333, HD027802)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD038075, HD19802, HD010333, HD11681, R01HD010333, R01HD046167, HD046167, R01HD038075, HD46167, HD027802, R01HD018426, HD 18426, HD-44454, R01HD044454, P50HD027802)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
general intelligence, genetic factors, heritability, shared environmental factors, twin pairs, liability threshold model, genetics of intelligence, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aptitude, Australia, Child, Child, Gifted, Child, Preschool, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Intelligence, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Statistics as Topic, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic, Models, Statistical, Genetic Heterogeneity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review