Separating Family-Level and Direct Exposure Effects of Smoking During Pregnancy on Offspring Externalizing Symptoms: Bridging the Behavior Genetic and Behavior Teratologic Divide
Open accessAbstract
Maternal smoking during pregnancy (MSDP) has been robustly associated with externalizing problems and their developmental precursors in offspring in studies using behavioral teratologic designs (Wakschlag et al., Am J Public Health 92(6):966-974, 2002; Espy et al., Dev Psychol 47(1):153-169, 2011). In contrast, the use of behavior genetic approaches has shown that the effects commonly attributed to MSDP can be explained by family-level variables (D'Onofrio et al., Dev Psychopathol 20(01):139-164, 2008). Reconciling these conflicting findings requires integration of these study designs. We utilize longitudinal data on a preschool proband and his/her sibling from the Midwest Infant Development Study-Preschool (MIDS-P) to test for teratologic and family level effects of MSDP. We find considerable variation in prenatal smoking patterns both within and across pregnancies within families, indicating that binary smoking measures are not sufficiently capturing exposure. Structural equation models indicate that both conduct disorder and oppositional defiant disorder symptoms showed unique effects of MSDP over and above family level effects. Blending high quality exposure measurement with a within-family design suggests that it is premature to foreclose the possibility of a teratologic effect of MSDP on externalizing problems. Implications and recommendations for future studies are discussed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent sibling study found modest but statistically significant associations between tobacco exposure and conduct disorder and oppositional defiant disorder symptoms.
“A recent sibling study that included detailed exposure data and careful control for family-level effects found modest, but statistically significant associations between tobacco exposure and conduct disorder symptoms and oppositional defiant disorder symptoms.”
From Developmental toxicity of nicotine: A transdisciplinary synthesis and implications for emerging tobacco products (2017) · cites this paper as [153]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Cnattingius, S. (2004) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200410001669187 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
Huizink, A. C., & Mulder, E. J. H. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.005 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
D’Onofrio, B. M., Lahey, B. B., Turkheimer, E., & Lichtenstein, P. (2013) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301252 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Lotfipour, S., Ferguson, E., Leonard, G., Perron, M., Pike, B., Richer, L., Séguin, J. R., Toro, R., Veillette, S., Pausova, Z., et al. (2009) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.124 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Wiebe, S. A., Clark, C. A. C., De Jong, D. M., Chevalier, N., Espy, K. A., & Wakschlag, L. (2015) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s095457941500005x · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
England, L. J., Aagaard, K., Bloch, M., Conway, K., Cosgrove, K., Grana, R., Gould, T. J., Hatsukami, D., Jensen, F., Kandel, D., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.013 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-citationJami, E. S., Hammerschlag, A. R., Bartels, M., & Middeldorp, C. M. (2021) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-021-01300-2 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
- Authors
- Estabrook, R., Massey, S. H., Clark, C. A. C., Burns, J. L., Mustanski, B. S., Cook, E. H., O’Brien, T. C., Makowski, B., Espy, K. A., & Wakschlag, L. S.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Illinois College (US)
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- Corresponding author
- Estabrook, Ryne
- ORCID
- Venue
- Behavior Genetics
- Published
- 2015-11-18
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 389-402
- ISSN
- 0001-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3297
- PMC
- PMC4860106
- OpenAlex
- W2246299788
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Behavior Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA023653-01A-2)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- smoking during pregnancy, prenatal tobacco exposure, conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, exposure measurement, preschool children
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Family, Female, Genetics, Behavioral, Humans, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Smoking, Teratology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review