The effect of fire history in shaping diversity patterns of flower-visiting insects in post-fire Mediterranean pine forests
Abstract
Fire affects diversity and structure of flower-visitor communities. We explored the effect of fire history on the diversity patterns and structure of the flower-visitor guilds (bees, beetles, flies, sawflies, and wasps), across a post-fire regeneration sequence of pine forests in Rhodes Island, Greece. Fire history was defined by fire frequency and post-fire age of sites. We did not find significant differences in species richness and abundance per guild between fire-history regimes except for the abundance of flies, sawflies and the entire flower-visitor community. Fire strongly affected the community structure of bees, beetles, and sawflies. Some of the most abundant and common species responded significantly to fire in terms of abundance; yet, we observed no significant variation in the abundance of the common species of bees, the most prominent pollinator group, implying that provision of pollination services may not be considerably affected by fire. Long-unburnt sites displayed higher heterogeneity in species composition compared to recently-burnt sites (either burnt once or twice). This pattern deviated significantly from null expectations when analyzing the abundance-based metric of β-diversity and was obscure in the case of the presence/absence-based metric, indicating that fire affected mainly the spatial distribution of individuals, i.e. the main change is not due to species turnover but to changes in relative abundance. Furthermore, the species composition in recently-burnt sites (burnt once in 2008) were more similar than in twice-burnt sites (including areas burnt once between 1984 and 1992, and in 2008), indicating that fire frequency affected post-fire heterogeneity of species composition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effect of fire on plant-animal interactions other than herbivory (pollination, dispersal, seed predation) is less known.
“However, the effect of fire on other plant-animal interactions (pollination, dispersal, seed predation) is less known (Lazarina et al., 2017).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Lazarina et al., 2017
Cites
Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change
Warren, M. S., Hill, J. K., Thomas, J. A., Asher, J., Fox, R., Huntley, B., Roy, D. B., Telfer, M. G., Jeffcoate, S., Harding, P., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35102054 · Cited by 1,333 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of bees’ responses to anthropogenic disturbance
Winfree, R., Aguilar, R., Vázquez, D. P., LeBuhn, G., & Aizen, M. A. (2009) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/08-1245.1 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants
Vázquez, D. P., Morris, W. F., & Jordano, P. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00810.x · Cited by 599 · see citing works
Disturbance alters beta‐diversity but not the relative importance of community assembly mechanisms
Myers, J. A., Chase, J. M., Crandall, R. M., & Jiménez, I. (2015) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12436 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
“However, the effect of fire on other plant–animal interactions (pollination, dispersal, seed predation) is less known (Lazarina et al., 2017).”
- Authors
- Lazarina, M., Sgardelis, S. P., Tscheulin, T., Devalez, J., Mizerakis, V., Kallimanis, A. S., Papakonstantinou, S., Kyriazis, T., & Petanidou, T.
- Affiliations
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
- University of the Aegean (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Lazarina, Maria
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biodiversity and Conservation
- Published
- 2016-10-17
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-131
- ISSN
- 0960-3115 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9710
- OpenAlex
- W2534634577
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biodiversity and Conservation (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Social Fund (BE),Greek national funds (376737)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- fire history, fire frequency, post-fire regeneration, flower-visiting insects, pollinators, bee communities, beetle communities, sawflies, flies, wasps, community structure, beta diversity, species composition, Mediterranean pine forests, Rhodes Island
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review