The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon input differences as the main factor explaining the variability in soil organic C storage in no-tilled compared to inversion tilled agrosystems
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils
Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. (2002) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1016125726789 · Cited by 4,633
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215 · cited 3×
“…Normale Supérieure, CNRS, UMR 8538, 24 rue Lhomond, 75005 Paris, France A. Burlot Université Pierre et Marie Curie, UMR BioEMCo, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France observed to favour the accumulation of organic C in the soil in many cases (e.g. Kern and Johnson 1993; West and Post 2002; Lal 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialCalculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes
Ellert, B. H., & Bettany, J. R. (1995) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/cjss95-075 · Cited by 1,686
Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa : the heretics ’ view
Giller, K. E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., & Tittonell, P. (2009) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017 · Cited by 1,499
Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—What do we really know?
Baker, J. M., Ochsner, T. E., Venterea, R. T., & Griffis, T. J. (2007) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.014 · Cited by 1,252
Cited by
Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation
Powlson, D. S., Stirling, C. M., Jat, M. L., Gerard, B. G., Palm, C. A., Sanchez, P. A., & Cassman, K. G. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2292 · Cited by 901
Soussana, J.-F., Lutfalla, S., Ehrhardt, F., Rosenstock, T., Lamanna, C., Havlík, P., Richards, M., Wollenberg, E. (., Chotte, J.-L., Torquebiau, E., et al. (2019) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2017.12.002 · Cited by 369
Accounting for soil carbon changes in agricultural life cycle assessment (LCA): a review
Goglio, P., Smith, W. N., Grant, B. B., Desjardins, R. L., McConkey, B. G., Campbell, C. A., & Nemecek, T. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.040 · Cited by 198
Photosynthetic limits on carbon sequestration in croplands
Janzen, H. H., van Groenigen, K. J., Powlson, D. S., Schwinghamer, T., & van Groenigen, J. W. (2022) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115810 · Cited by 126
Mary, B., Clivot, H., Blaszczyk, N., Labreuche, J., & Ferchaud, F. (2020) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2020.106972 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Virto, I., Barré, P., Burlot, A., & Chenu, C.
- Venue
- Biogeochemistry
- Published
- 2011-04-02
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 17-26
- ISSN
- 0168-2563 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-515X
- OpenAlex
- W2057191054
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon input differences as the main factor explaining the variability in soil organic C storage in no-tilled compared to inversion tilled agrosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10533-011-9600-4
- The paper
- Virto, I., Barré, P., Burlot, A., & Chenu, C. (2012). Carbon input differences as the main factor explaining the variability in soil organic C storage in no-tilled compared to inversion tilled agrosystems. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9600-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
