Cited by 99Phytoestrogen effects and researchNutritional Studies and DietCancer Risks and Factors

Soyfood intake and breast cancer survival: a followup of the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study

Boyapati, Sonia M., Shu, Xiao-ou, Ruan, Zhi Xian, Dai, Qi, Cai, Qiuyin, Gao, Yu-tang, Zheng, Wei·2005·Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Abstract

Soy and its constituents have been shown in many in vivo and in vitro studies and in some epidemiological studies to have anti-cancer effects. Some soy constituents, however, also stimulate cell proliferation, which has raised concerns in promoting soy intake among breast cancer survivors. To investigate whether soy intake may be associated with breast cancer survival, we evaluated data from a cohort of 1459 breast cancer patients who participated in the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study between 1996 and 1998. Usual soy food intake was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire at baseline. The median follow-up time for this cohort of women was 5.2 years. We found that soy intake prior to cancer diagnosis was unrelated to disease-free breast cancer survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.33 for the highest tertile compared to the lowest tertile). The association between soy protein intake and breast cancer survival did not differ according to ER/PR status, tumor stage, age at diagnosis, body mass index (BMI), waist to hip ratio (WHR), or menopausal status. Additionally, the soy-survival association did not appear to vary according to XbaI or PvuII polymorphisms in ER-alpha, or C(14206)T, G(25652)A, or A(50766)G polymorphisms in ER-beta. These data suggest that soyfoods do not have an adverse effect on breast cancer survival.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10549-004-6019-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two additional prospective survival studies showed no significant effects.

    “Two additional studies showed no significant effects [98,106].”
  • Of seven prospective studies examining survival, four (57%) showed protective effects on breast cancer mortality or mortality in breast cancer patients.

    “Of seven studies examining survival [94,96,98,100,101,106,112], four (57%) showed protective effects on breast cancer mortality or mortality in breast cancer patients [94,96,101,112].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boyapati, S. M., Shu, X.-O., Ruan, Z. X., Dai, Q., Cai, Q., Gao, Y.-T., & Zheng, W.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Shanghai Cancer Institute (CN)
Corresponding author
Shu, Xiao-ou
Venue
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Published
2005-07
Volume
92
Issue
1
Pages
11-17
ISSN
  • 0167-6806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7217
OpenAlex
W1995291179
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA064277, R01CA090899)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
breast cancer survival, soy protein, disease-free survival, Shanghai Breast Cancer Study, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, XbaI polymorphism, PvuII polymorphism, estrogen receptor alpha, estrogen receptor beta, genetic polymorphism
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Diet, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Cohort Studies, Survival Analysis, Soy Foods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review