Cited by 53Phytoestrogen effects and researchNutritional Studies and DietCancer Risks and Factors

Soy and isoflavones consumption and breast cancer survival and recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Qiu, Shumin, Jiang, Chongmin·2019·European Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Background Some studies have investigated the association between soy and isoflavones consumption and breast cancer survival, but the results are far from conclusive. Accordingly, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore this issue.Methods We performed a comprehensive search of Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase from inception to January 2018. The summary hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random effects model.Results A total of 12 articles were included, which reported overall survival (OS), breast cancer specific survival (BCSS), and recurrence in 5770, 2386, and 1500 cases, respectively, among 37,275 women with breast cancer. The summary HR (95% CI) for the association (highest vs. lowest) of pre-diagnosis soy and isoflavones consumption with OS and BCSS was 0.84 (0.71-0.98) and 0.89 (0.74-1.07), respectively. Stratified analyses suggested that the reduced OS was more easily detected in studies that focused on post-menopausal patients. No significant association was found between post-diagnosis soy and isoflavones consumption with OS and BCSS, with summary HRs (95% CIs) of 0.80 (0.62-1.04) and 0.83 (0.64-1.07), respectively. Pre- and post-diagnosis soy isoflavones consumption were associated with reduced risk of recurrence.Conclusion This study provides limited evidence that pre-diagnosis soy and isoflavones intake is associated with a small reduction in post-menopausal breast cancer OS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00394-018-1853-4

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis in 2016 and two more in 2019 suggested that soy food intake may be associated with a decrease in the risk of breast cancer and improved breast cancer survival.

    “A meta-analysis in 2016 and two more in 2019 reported similar conclusions and further suggested that soy food intake may be associated with a decrease in the risk of breast cancer and improved breast cancer survival [139,140,141].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qiu, S., & Jiang, C.
Affiliations
  • Central University of Finance and Economics (CN)
  • China Institute of Sport Science (CN)
Corresponding author
Qiu, Shumin
Venue
European Journal of Nutrition
Published
2018-10-31
Volume
58
Issue
8
Pages
3079-3090
ISSN
  • 1436-6207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-6215
OpenAlex
W2899395846
Cited by
53
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
soy consumption, isoflavones, breast cancer, breast cancer survival, breast cancer recurrence, overall survival, breast cancer-specific survival, postmenopausal women
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Breast Neoplasms, Diet, Female, Humans, Isoflavones, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Soybean Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review