Cited by 93Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningCancer Risks and Factors

Racial/ethnic differences in initiation of adjuvant hormonal therapy among women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer

Open access
Livaudais, Jennifer C., Hershman, Dawn L., Habel, Laurel, Kushi, Lawrence, Gomez, Scarlett Lin, Li, Christopher I., Neugut, Alfred I., Fehrenbacher, Louis +2 more·2012·Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Abstract

Mortality after breast cancer diagnosis is known to vary by race/ethnicity even after adjustment for differences in tumor characteristics. As adjuvant hormonal therapy decreases risk of recurrence and increases overall survival among women with hormone receptor-positive tumors, treatment disparities may play a role. We explored racial/ethnic differences in initiation of adjuvant hormonal therapy, defined as two or more prescriptions for tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor filled within the first year after diagnosis of hormone receptor-positive localized or regional-stage breast cancer. The sample included women diagnosed with breast cancer enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). Odds ratios [OR] and 95% confidence intervals [CI] compared initiation by race/ethnicity (Hispanic, African American, Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, and South Asian vs. non-Hispanic White [NHW]) using logistic regression. Covariates included age and year of diagnosis, area-level socioeconomic status, co-morbidities, tumor stage, histology, grade, breast cancer surgery, radiation and chemotherapy use. Our sample included 13,753 women aged 20-79 years, diagnosed between 1996 and 2007, and 70% initiated adjuvant hormonal therapy. In multivariable analysis, Hispanic and Chinese women were less likely than NHW women to initiate adjuvant hormonal therapy ([OR] = 0.82; [CI] 0.71-0.96 and [OR] = 0.78; [CI] 0.63-0.98, respectively). Within an equal access, insured population, lower levels of initiation of adjuvant hormonal therapy were found for Hispanic and Chinese women. Findings need to be confirmed in other insured populations and the reasons for under-initiation among these groups need to be explored.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10549-011-1762-1

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]Chu KC Lamar CA Freeman HP Racial disparities in breast carcinoma survival rates: seperating factors that affect diagnosis from factors that affect treatment Cancer 2003 97 11 2853 2860 12767100

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Livaudais, J. C., Hershman, D. L., Habel, L., Kushi, L., Gomez, S. L., Li, C. I., Neugut, A. I., Fehrenbacher, L., Thompson, B., & Coronado, G. D.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Cancer Prevention Institute of California (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Livaudais, Jennifer C.
Venue
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Published
2011-09-16
Volume
131
Issue
2
Pages
607-617
ISSN
  • 0167-6806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7217
OpenAlex
W2055535124
Cited by
93
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Cancer Society
  • National Institutes of Health (n01pc35136-24-0-2)
  • National Cancer Institute (N01PC35136, R01CA098838, R25CA092408, R01CA105274, N01 PC035136, R01 CA98838)
  • National Center for Research Resources (TL1RR025016)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
adjuvant endocrine therapy, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, racial and ethnic disparities, tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, Hispanic women, Chinese women, treatment initiation, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, insured population, socioeconomic status
MeSH terms
Aged, Breast Neoplasms, California, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review