CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48Ethics in Business and EducationCorporate Governance and Financial ManagementCorporate Finance and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Ancients against the Moderns: Focusing on the Character of Corporate Leaders

Open access
Bragues, George·2008·Journal of Business Ethics
DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9342-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-006-9342-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Aristotle: 1982, Aristotle: Selected Works, H. G. Apostle and L. P. Gerson (trans.) (The Peripatetic Press, Grinnell, Iowa)
  2. Aristotle: 1984, The Politics, C. Lord (trans.) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) · DOI
  3. Bainbridge, S. M.: 2002, ‹A Critique of the NYSE’s Director Independence Listing Standards’, UCLA School of Law Research Paper Series, No. 02–15, Retrievable from, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=317121 (accessed March 22, 2006)
  4. Bainbridge S. M. (2005) Executive Compensation: Who Decides?. Texas Law Review 83(6):1616–1662
  5. Bebchuk L., Fried J. (2004) Pay Without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
  6. Becht, M., P. Bolton, and A. Rőell: 2002, ‹Corporate Governance and Control’, European Corporate Governance Institute: Finance Working Paper No. 02/2002, Retrievable from, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=343461. (accessed March 22, 2006) (Publication forthcoming in Constantinides, M. Harris and René Stulz (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, North-Holland).
  7. Berle A. A., Means G. C. (1991) The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ
  8. Bhagat S., Black B. S. (2002) The Non-Correlation between Board Independence and Long-Term Firm Performance. Journal of Corporation Law 27(2):231–273
  9. Black B. S. (1998) Shareholder Activism and Corporate Governance in the United States. In: Newman P. (ed) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and Law. Vol. 3, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 459–465
  10. Bloom A. (1977) Reply to Hall. Political Theory 5(3):314–329 · DOI
  11. Cheng Q., Warfield T. D. (2005) Equity Incentives and Earnings Management. Accounting Review 80(2):441–476 · DOI
  12. Efendi, J., A. E. P. Srivastava and E. P. Swanson: 2005, ‹Why Do Corporate Managers Misstate Financial Statements? The Role of in-the-money Options and Other Incentives’, Texas A and M Working Paper, Retrievable from, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id= 547922 (accessed March 22, 2006) · DOI
  13. Franklin, B.: 2004, The Autobiography and other Writings on Politics, Economics, and Virtue, Alan Houston (ed.) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass) · DOI
  14. Franklin, B.: 2006, ‹A Dissertation on Liberty, Necessity, Pleasure and Pain’, in The Writings of Benjamin Franklin: Boston and London 1722–1726, Retrieved on March 23, 2006 from, http://www.historycarper.com/resources/twobf1/m7.htm
  15. Gao, P. and R. E. Shrieves: 2002, ‹Earnings Management and Executive Compensation: A Case of Overdose of Option and Underdose of Salary?’, Proceedings of the EFA 2002 Berlin Meetings, Retrievable from, http://ssrn.com/abstract=302843 (accessed March 22, 2006) · DOI
  16. Gillan S., Starks L. T. (1998) A Survey of Shareholder Activism. Contemporary Finance Digest 2(3):10–34
  17. Hall D. (1977) The Republic and the Limits of Politics. Political Theory 5(3):293–313 · DOI
  18. Healy P. M., Palepu K. G. (2003) The Fall of Enron. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(2):3–26 · DOI
  19. Hobbes, T.: 1968, Leviathan, C. B. Macpherson (ed.), (Penguin, New York)
  20. Isaacson W. (2003) Benjamin Franklin: An American Life. Simon and Schuster, New York
  21. Jensen M., Meckling W. H. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4):305–360 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Johnson, S. A., H. E. Ryan and Y. S. Tian: 2003, ‹Executive Compensation and Corporate Fraud’, Louisiana State University Working Paper, Retrievable from, http://ssrn.com/abstract=395960 (accessed March 23, 2006) · DOI
  23. Kadan, O. and J. Yang: ‹Executive Stock Options and Earnings Management – A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis’, Proceedings of the AFA 2006 Boston Meetings Paper, Retrievable from, http://ssrn.com/abstract=615881. (accessed March 23, 2006) · DOI
  24. Locke J. (1960) The Second Treatise of Government. In: Laslett P. (ed) Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
  25. Locke, J.: 1996, Some Thoughts Concerning Education and of the Conduct of the Understanding, R. W. Grant and N. Tarcov (eds.), (Hackett, Indianapolis)
  26. MacIntyre A. (1984) After Virtue. 2nd ed. University of Notre Dame Press, South Bend, Indiana
  27. Madison J., Hamilton A., Jay J. (1982) The Federalist Papers. Bantam Books, New York
  28. Moberg D. (2000) Role Models and Moral Exemplars: How do Employees acquire virtues by observing others? Business Ethics Quarterly 10(3):675–696 · DOI
  29. Montesquieu B. (1949) The Spirit of the Laws. Hafner Press, New York
  30. Pangle T. (1988) The Spirit of Modern Republicanism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  31. Pangle T., Pangle L. (1993) The Learning of Liberty. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas · DOI
  32. Pocock J. G. A. (1975) The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
  33. Ribstein, L.: 2002: ‹Markets vs. Regulatory Responses to Corporate Fraud: A Critique of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002’, 28(1), pp. 1–67 · DOI
  34. Romano, R.: 2004, ‹The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance’, NYU Law and Econ Research Paper 04-032, Retrievable from, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=596101 (accessed March 22, 2006)
  35. Smith A. (1981) An Inquiry into the Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 2 Vols. Liberty Press, Indianapolis
  36. Solomon R. C. (1999) A Better Way to Think about Business. Oxford University Press, Oxford · DOI
  37. Weinberg J. (2005) Benjamin Franklin Unmasked. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bragues, G.
Affiliations
University of Guelph-Humber (CA)
Corresponding author
Bragues, George
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2007-03-17
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
373-387
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
DOI
10.1007/s10551-006-9342-8
OpenAlex
W2033881348
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Financial Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Corporate Finance and Governance
Keywords
ancient political thought, modern political thought, corporate governance reform, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, board composition, shareholder activism, executive compensation, virtue ethics, enlightened self-interest, Benjamin Franklin, Plato, Aristotle, corporate scandals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review